The Anzhen Risk Scoring System for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Observational Study Protocol

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications Pub Date : 2023-02-11 DOI:10.15212/cvia.2023.0002
Bo Jia, Cheng Luo, Chengnan Li, Y. Ge, Yongliang Zhong, Z. Qiao, Haiou Hu, Suwei Chen, Junming Zhu
{"title":"The Anzhen Risk Scoring System for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Observational Study Protocol","authors":"Bo Jia, Cheng Luo, Chengnan Li, Y. Ge, Yongliang Zhong, Z. Qiao, Haiou Hu, Suwei Chen, Junming Zhu","doi":"10.15212/cvia.2023.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIntroduction: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a catastrophic disease with fatal outcomes. Malperfusion syndrome (MPS) is a serious complication of ATAAD, with an incidence of 20–40%. Many studies have shown that MPS is the main risk factor for poor ATAAD prognosis. However, a risk scoring system for ATAAD based on MPS is lacking. Here, we designed a risk scoring system for ATAAD to assess mortality through quantitative assessment of relevant organ malperfusion and subsequently develop rational treatment strategies.\n\nMethods and analysis: This was a prospective observational study. Patients’ perioperative clinical data were collected to establish a database of ATAAD (N≥3000) and determine whether these patients had malperfusion complications. The Anzhen risk scoring system was established on the basis of organ malperfusion by using a random forest survival model and a logistics model. The better method was then chosen to establish a revised risk scoring system.\n\nEthics and dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committees of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University (KS2019034-1). Patient consent was waived because biological samples were not collected, and no patient rights were violated. Findings will be disseminated at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.","PeriodicalId":41559,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15212/cvia.2023.0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a catastrophic disease with fatal outcomes. Malperfusion syndrome (MPS) is a serious complication of ATAAD, with an incidence of 20–40%. Many studies have shown that MPS is the main risk factor for poor ATAAD prognosis. However, a risk scoring system for ATAAD based on MPS is lacking. Here, we designed a risk scoring system for ATAAD to assess mortality through quantitative assessment of relevant organ malperfusion and subsequently develop rational treatment strategies. Methods and analysis: This was a prospective observational study. Patients’ perioperative clinical data were collected to establish a database of ATAAD (N≥3000) and determine whether these patients had malperfusion complications. The Anzhen risk scoring system was established on the basis of organ malperfusion by using a random forest survival model and a logistics model. The better method was then chosen to establish a revised risk scoring system. Ethics and dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committees of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University (KS2019034-1). Patient consent was waived because biological samples were not collected, and no patient rights were violated. Findings will be disseminated at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性A型主动脉夹层的安贞风险评分系统:一项前瞻性观察性研究方案
急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)是一种致命的灾难性疾病。灌注不良综合征(MPS)是ATAAD的严重并发症,发生率为20-40%。许多研究表明,MPS是ATAAD预后不良的主要危险因素。然而,目前尚缺乏基于MPS的ATAAD风险评分系统。在此,我们设计了ATAAD的风险评分系统,通过定量评估相关器官灌注不良来评估死亡率,从而制定合理的治疗策略。方法与分析:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究。收集患者围手术期临床资料,建立ATAAD数据库(N≥3000),判断患者是否存在灌注不良并发症。采用随机森林生存模型和物流模型,在器官灌注不良的基础上建立了安贞风险评分系统。然后选择较好的方法建立修订后的风险评分系统。伦理与传播:本研究获得首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院伦理委员会(KS2019034-1)的伦理批准。由于没有采集生物样本,患者的同意被放弃,并且没有侵犯患者的权利。研究结果将在科学会议和同行评议的出版物上传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications
Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure Incidence, Predictors and Associations Between In-Hospital Bleeding and Adverse Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Above 75 Years of Age – The Real-World Scenario Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Maps Immune Cell Heterogeneity in Mice with Allogeneic Cardiac Transplantation Coronavirus Disease 2019, Myocardial Injury, and Myocarditis Predictive Value of a Combination of the Age, Creatinine and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) Score and Fibrinogen Level in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1