Lymph Nodal Metastatic Pattern in Carcinoma Gallbladder with Multidetector Computed Tomography: An Institutional Experience

G. Raj, Bhanupriya Singh, R. Raj, Ragini Singh
{"title":"Lymph Nodal Metastatic Pattern in Carcinoma Gallbladder with Multidetector Computed Tomography: An Institutional Experience","authors":"G. Raj, Bhanupriya Singh, R. Raj, Ragini Singh","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1714306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective This work aimed to study the distribution of lymph nodal metastatic pattern in carcinoma gallbladder with multidetector computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted including 80 patients with carcinoma gallbladder who underwent triple-phase CT angiography or single-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen between January 2019 and November 2019. Results In our study, 75 (93.7%) out of 80 cases showed metastasis to lymph nodes, with distribution as follows: periportal (69), peripancreatic (62), and aortocaval (47). The most common involved combination included all three lymph nodal groups (periportal, peripancreatic, and aortocaval), involving 40 (50%) cases. The combination of only periportal and peripancreatic lymph nodes was seen in 17 (21%) cases. Isolated periportal lymph nodes were seen in eight cases (10%) cases. The combination of only periportal and aortocaval lymph nodes was seen in four (5%) cases. Isolated peripancreatic lymph nodes were seen in three (3.7%) cases. The combination of periportal and aortocaval was seen in four (5%) cases followed by peripancreatic and aortocaval lymph nodes that was seen in two (2.5%) cases. Isolated aortocaval lymph nodes were seen in one (1.2%) case. Conclusion Periportal lymph nodes were the single most commonly involved station followed by peripancreatic and aortocaval lymph nodes. The combination of periportal, peripancreatic, and aortocaval lymph nodes was seen most commonly. The second most commonly involved combination was found to be periportal and peripancreatic lymph nodes followed by isolated periportal lymph nodes.","PeriodicalId":31357,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Oncology","volume":"7 1","pages":"22 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0040-1714306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective This work aimed to study the distribution of lymph nodal metastatic pattern in carcinoma gallbladder with multidetector computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted including 80 patients with carcinoma gallbladder who underwent triple-phase CT angiography or single-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen between January 2019 and November 2019. Results In our study, 75 (93.7%) out of 80 cases showed metastasis to lymph nodes, with distribution as follows: periportal (69), peripancreatic (62), and aortocaval (47). The most common involved combination included all three lymph nodal groups (periportal, peripancreatic, and aortocaval), involving 40 (50%) cases. The combination of only periportal and peripancreatic lymph nodes was seen in 17 (21%) cases. Isolated periportal lymph nodes were seen in eight cases (10%) cases. The combination of only periportal and aortocaval lymph nodes was seen in four (5%) cases. Isolated peripancreatic lymph nodes were seen in three (3.7%) cases. The combination of periportal and aortocaval was seen in four (5%) cases followed by peripancreatic and aortocaval lymph nodes that was seen in two (2.5%) cases. Isolated aortocaval lymph nodes were seen in one (1.2%) case. Conclusion Periportal lymph nodes were the single most commonly involved station followed by peripancreatic and aortocaval lymph nodes. The combination of periportal, peripancreatic, and aortocaval lymph nodes was seen most commonly. The second most commonly involved combination was found to be periportal and peripancreatic lymph nodes followed by isolated periportal lymph nodes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆囊癌淋巴结转移模式的多探测器计算机断层扫描:一个机构的经验
【摘要】目的利用多探头计算机断层扫描(CT)研究胆囊癌淋巴结转移的分布。材料与方法对2019年1月至2019年11月行腹部三期CT血管造影或单期CT增强扫描的80例胆囊癌患者进行回顾性观察研究。结果本组80例患者中有75例(93.7%)出现淋巴结转移,分布如下:门周69例,胰周62例,腹主动脉47例。最常见的受累组合包括所有三个淋巴结组(门静脉周围、胰腺周围和主动脉腔静脉),共40例(50%)。17例(21%)仅合并门周和胰周淋巴结。孤立的门静脉周围淋巴结8例(10%)。仅有4例(5%)合并门静脉周围和主动脉腔静脉淋巴结。孤立胰周淋巴结3例(3.7%)。4例(5%)出现门周和腹主动脉合并淋巴结,2例(2.5%)出现胰周和腹主动脉合并淋巴结。1例(1.2%)见主动脉腔腹孤立淋巴结。结论门静脉周围淋巴结是最常见的受累部位,其次是胰周淋巴结和腹主动脉周围淋巴结。门静脉周围、胰腺周围和主动脉腔静脉淋巴结的合并是最常见的。第二个最常见的受累组合是门静脉周围和胰周围淋巴结,其次是孤立的门静脉周围淋巴结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Equitable and affordable cancer program in Assam: An initiative of Tata trusts and Government of Assam BCOR overexpression in pediatric sarcomas- a morphologic continuum of mixed round and spindle cell tumors Assessment of swallowing dysfunction using fees (flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing) in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy Hodgkin lymphoma and bone marrow tuberculosis: A coincidence Barriers to timely lung cancer diagnosis and treatment in a Philippine tertiary hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1