How university instructors apply the design principles for electronic courses: a comparative study based on Richard Mayer's model on multimedia learning

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS International Journal of Information and Learning Technology Pub Date : 2022-08-11 DOI:10.1108/ijilt-11-2021-0173
H. Keshavarz, Somayeh Fallahnia, Fatemeh Hamdi
{"title":"How university instructors apply the design principles for electronic courses: a comparative study based on Richard Mayer's model on multimedia learning","authors":"H. Keshavarz, Somayeh Fallahnia, Fatemeh Hamdi","doi":"10.1108/ijilt-11-2021-0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDue to the lack of standard and research-based frameworks in evaluating the content designed in electronic courses, there appears a need to examine some existing theoretical models like the cognitive theory of multimedia learning (CTML) developed by Richard Mayer on real occasions. To confirm the effectiveness of the seven principles of the model driven from this theory in different educational settings, especially amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the present study was conducted in the contexts of two universities in Iran for comparison purposes.Design/methodology/approachThe present research is a descriptive one for which a survey method was considered to collect data. A measurement instrument was developed based on the seven principles mentioned in the last edition of the book written by Clark and Mayer (2016) as well as an extensive review of the related literature. The data gathered from 524 online questionnaires returned by students of a public university Shahid Beheshti University (SBU) and a private one Ruzbahan University (RU) were then analyzed through partial least squares using SmartPLS 3.0.FindingsThe results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that convergent and discriminant validities, as well as model fit indices, had the reliability of the theoretical model at the 99% confidence level. Based on the path coefficients found for testing hypotheses, modality and coherence principles were the first and last priorities, respectively. Moreover, the comparative study showed that t-statistics values for multimedia, contiguity, modality, redundancy and personalization but not for coherence, and segmenting and pretraining principles are significantly different between the two universities.Originality/valueThis study can be considered a pioneering research in Iran so as to increase the quality of multimedia design, instruction and learning at university levels in future research while emphasizing the importance of Mayer’s principles in the design of electronic content.","PeriodicalId":51872,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Learning Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Learning Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-11-2021-0173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeDue to the lack of standard and research-based frameworks in evaluating the content designed in electronic courses, there appears a need to examine some existing theoretical models like the cognitive theory of multimedia learning (CTML) developed by Richard Mayer on real occasions. To confirm the effectiveness of the seven principles of the model driven from this theory in different educational settings, especially amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the present study was conducted in the contexts of two universities in Iran for comparison purposes.Design/methodology/approachThe present research is a descriptive one for which a survey method was considered to collect data. A measurement instrument was developed based on the seven principles mentioned in the last edition of the book written by Clark and Mayer (2016) as well as an extensive review of the related literature. The data gathered from 524 online questionnaires returned by students of a public university Shahid Beheshti University (SBU) and a private one Ruzbahan University (RU) were then analyzed through partial least squares using SmartPLS 3.0.FindingsThe results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that convergent and discriminant validities, as well as model fit indices, had the reliability of the theoretical model at the 99% confidence level. Based on the path coefficients found for testing hypotheses, modality and coherence principles were the first and last priorities, respectively. Moreover, the comparative study showed that t-statistics values for multimedia, contiguity, modality, redundancy and personalization but not for coherence, and segmenting and pretraining principles are significantly different between the two universities.Originality/valueThis study can be considered a pioneering research in Iran so as to increase the quality of multimedia design, instruction and learning at university levels in future research while emphasizing the importance of Mayer’s principles in the design of electronic content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学教师如何将设计原则应用于电子课程:基于Richard Mayer多媒体学习模式的比较研究
目的由于缺乏标准和基于研究的框架来评估电子课程中设计的内容,似乎有必要检查一些现有的理论模型,如Richard Mayer在实际情况下开发的多媒体学习认知理论(CTML)。为了证实该理论驱动的模型七项原则在不同教育环境中的有效性,特别是在新冠肺炎大流行期间,本研究在伊朗两所大学的背景下进行,以进行比较。设计/方法论/方法本研究是一项描述性研究,考虑采用调查方法收集数据。测量仪器是基于Clark和Mayer(2016)撰写的上一本书中提到的七项原则以及对相关文献的广泛综述而开发的。从公立大学Shahid Beheshti大学(SBU)和私立大学Ruzbahan大学(RU)的学生返回的524份在线问卷中收集的数据,然后使用SmartPLS 3.0通过偏最小二乘法进行分析,具有99%置信水平的理论模型的可靠性。根据测试假设的路径系数,模态和连贯原则分别是第一和最后的优先事项。此外,比较研究表明,这两所大学在多媒体、邻接性、模态、冗余和个性化方面的t统计值(而不是连贯性)以及分割和预训练原则方面存在显著差异。原创性/价值这项研究可以被认为是伊朗的一项开创性研究,目的是在未来的研究中提高大学多媒体设计、教学和学习的质量,同时强调Mayer原理在电子内容设计中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information and Learning Technology
International Journal of Information and Learning Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: International Journal of Information and Learning Technology (IJILT) provides a forum for the sharing of the latest theories, applications, and services related to planning, developing, managing, using, and evaluating information technologies in administrative, academic, and library computing, as well as other educational technologies. Submissions can include research: -Illustrating and critiquing educational technologies -New uses of technology in education -Issue-or results-focused case studies detailing examples of technology applications in higher education -In-depth analyses of the latest theories, applications and services in the field The journal provides wide-ranging and independent coverage of the management, use and integration of information resources and learning technologies.
期刊最新文献
Development of an Automated Hall Effect Experimentation Method for the Electrical Characterization of Thin Films Deteksi Tingkat Kematangan Buah Pinang Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine Berdasarkan Warna Dan Tekstur Analisis Kinerja Mikrokomputer Raspberry Pi Pada Smart Greenhouse Berbasis Internet Of Things (IoT) Menggunakan Algoritma Naive Baye SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENENTUAN GURU BERPRESTASI MENGGUNAKAN METODE TOPSIS (STUDI KASUS: DINAS PPO KAB. TTU) Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Terhadap Penerapan Sistem Informasi Terpadu Layanan Prodi (SIPLO) Menggunakan End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1