Investigating the possibility of using noninvasive basic monitoring in patients with acute burns undergoing general anesthesia

IF 0.3 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Trauma Research Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.4103/atr.atr_6_20
A. Jafarian, A. Farhoodi, Z. Jafarian, A. Emami, Mohaddeseh Jafarian, R. Salehi
{"title":"Investigating the possibility of using noninvasive basic monitoring in patients with acute burns undergoing general anesthesia","authors":"A. Jafarian, A. Farhoodi, Z. Jafarian, A. Emami, Mohaddeseh Jafarian, R. Salehi","doi":"10.4103/atr.atr_6_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Basic noninvasive monitoring is considered as the standard procedure in patients with acute burns under general anesthesia. In such cases, noninvasive monitoring probes may often be ineffective on damaged skin due to the nature of burns pathology. Hence, the noninvasive monitoring is very challenging. Because of such limitations, we conducted this study to examine the practical difficulties or possibility of noninvasive monitoring utilization. Methods: Over the period of 2016–2017, 100 patients who were injured by acute burns with 20%–90% of TBS and undergoing general anesthesia at Motahari Burn Hospital were enrolled in this descriptive study. Basic monitoring techniques including noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP), cardiac monitoring, and pulse oximetry were applied throughout all surgeries as much as possible. Results: Evidence demonstrated that the application of NIBP monitoring in 23% of cases, cardiac monitoring in 63% of patients, and also even pulse oximetry in 7% of them were impossible. Conclusion: Limited usage of invasive monitoring due to vulnerability to sepsis leads to the noninvasive approach. Hence, technical innovations in noninvasive monitoring may help clinicians to monitor physiological indices, more safely.","PeriodicalId":45486,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Trauma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Trauma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atr.atr_6_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Basic noninvasive monitoring is considered as the standard procedure in patients with acute burns under general anesthesia. In such cases, noninvasive monitoring probes may often be ineffective on damaged skin due to the nature of burns pathology. Hence, the noninvasive monitoring is very challenging. Because of such limitations, we conducted this study to examine the practical difficulties or possibility of noninvasive monitoring utilization. Methods: Over the period of 2016–2017, 100 patients who were injured by acute burns with 20%–90% of TBS and undergoing general anesthesia at Motahari Burn Hospital were enrolled in this descriptive study. Basic monitoring techniques including noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP), cardiac monitoring, and pulse oximetry were applied throughout all surgeries as much as possible. Results: Evidence demonstrated that the application of NIBP monitoring in 23% of cases, cardiac monitoring in 63% of patients, and also even pulse oximetry in 7% of them were impossible. Conclusion: Limited usage of invasive monitoring due to vulnerability to sepsis leads to the noninvasive approach. Hence, technical innovations in noninvasive monitoring may help clinicians to monitor physiological indices, more safely.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨在急性烧伤全麻患者中应用无创基础监测的可能性
背景:基本的无创监测被认为是全麻下急性烧伤患者的标准程序。在这种情况下,由于烧伤病理的性质,非侵入性监测探头可能通常对受损皮肤无效。因此,无创监测是非常有挑战性的。由于这些限制,我们进行了这项研究,以检查无创监测应用的实际困难或可能性。方法:选取2016-2017年期间在Motahari烧伤医院接受全身麻醉的急性烧伤患者100例,其中TBS发生率为20%-90%。基本监测技术包括无创血压(NIBP)、心脏监测和脉搏血氧仪在所有手术中尽可能多地应用。结果:有证据表明,23%的病例无法应用NIBP监测,63%的患者无法应用心脏监测,7%的患者甚至无法应用脉搏血氧测定。结论:由于易患败血症,有创监测的使用有限,导致无创入路。因此,无创监测的技术创新可以帮助临床医生更安全地监测生理指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in all fields related to trauma or injury. Archives of Trauma Research is an authentic clinical journal, which is devoted to the particular compilation of the latest worldwide and interdisciplinary approach and findings, including original manuscripts, meta-analyses and reviews, health economic papers, debates, and consensus statements of clinical relevant to the trauma and injury field. Readers are generally specialists in the fields of general surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, or any other related fields of basic and clinical sciences..
期刊最新文献
An epidemiologic study of traumatic brain injury in children, middle-aged patients, and elderly presenting to the emergency department Nonoperative treatment of talonavicular joint dislocation associated with jones fracture Risk assessment of reheating furnace by failure modes and effect analysis method in steel complexes A nonsurgical trauma causing bilateral adductor palsy of the vocal folds following total thyroidectomy Forearm longitudinal discrepancy after forearm fractures' fixation in pediatric: A case series study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1