Perceptions of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Acute Care Pediatric Physical Therapy

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1097/jat.0000000000000220
Dana Tischler, W. Pitney, Janine Wood, M. Shotwell, Cade Mooney
{"title":"Perceptions of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Acute Care Pediatric Physical Therapy","authors":"Dana Tischler, W. Pitney, Janine Wood, M. Shotwell, Cade Mooney","doi":"10.1097/jat.0000000000000220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To explore the perceptions and experiences of acute care pediatric physical therapists (PTs) regarding the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to understand the influence of PROMs on clinical decision-making and the plan of care. Methods: Thirteen acute care pediatric PTs participated in individual semistructured interviews using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Interview questions focused on how PROMs influence clinical practice and decision-making. Interviews also explored scenarios where using PROMs positively or negatively impacted patient and caregiver interactions. Researchers analyzed the interview transcripts using an inductive process to generate codes and resultant themes. Results: Participants described their experiences using PROMs in pediatric acute care, and 4 themes emerged: (1) PROMs can be difficult to implement in pediatric acute care, (2) PROMs can benefit pediatric acute care practice, (3) PROMs can improve service delivery and family-centered care, and (4) ideal PROM use in future practice. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to categorize positive and negative factors related to implementing evidence-based guidelines in the pediatric acute care setting. Conclusions: Acute care pediatric PTs report benefits and barriers to using PROMs with children and caregivers in the hospital setting. Findings support the need for future knowledge translation initiatives to facilitate the use of PROMs in pediatric acute care.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jat.0000000000000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the perceptions and experiences of acute care pediatric physical therapists (PTs) regarding the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to understand the influence of PROMs on clinical decision-making and the plan of care. Methods: Thirteen acute care pediatric PTs participated in individual semistructured interviews using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Interview questions focused on how PROMs influence clinical practice and decision-making. Interviews also explored scenarios where using PROMs positively or negatively impacted patient and caregiver interactions. Researchers analyzed the interview transcripts using an inductive process to generate codes and resultant themes. Results: Participants described their experiences using PROMs in pediatric acute care, and 4 themes emerged: (1) PROMs can be difficult to implement in pediatric acute care, (2) PROMs can benefit pediatric acute care practice, (3) PROMs can improve service delivery and family-centered care, and (4) ideal PROM use in future practice. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to categorize positive and negative factors related to implementing evidence-based guidelines in the pediatric acute care setting. Conclusions: Acute care pediatric PTs report benefits and barriers to using PROMs with children and caregivers in the hospital setting. Findings support the need for future knowledge translation initiatives to facilitate the use of PROMs in pediatric acute care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性护理儿童物理治疗中患者报告结果测量的感知
目的:探讨急症期儿科物理治疗师(PTs)对使用患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的认知和经验,并了解PROMs对临床决策和护理计划的影响。方法:采用定性现象学方法对13名急症儿科PTs进行了半结构化访谈。访谈问题集中在PROMs如何影响临床实践和决策。访谈还探讨了使用prom对患者和护理人员的互动产生积极或消极影响的情况。研究人员使用归纳过程来分析访谈记录,以生成代码和结果主题。结果:参与者描述了他们在儿科急症护理中使用PROM的经验,并提出了4个主题:(1)PROM在儿科急症护理中难以实施;(2)PROM可以使儿科急症护理实践受益;(3)PROM可以改善服务提供和以家庭为中心的护理;(4)在未来的实践中理想地使用PROM。理论领域框架(TDF)用于分类与在儿科急症护理环境中实施循证指南相关的积极因素和消极因素。结论:急性护理儿科PTs报告了在医院环境中与儿童和护理人员一起使用PROMs的好处和障碍。研究结果支持未来知识翻译倡议的必要性,以促进PROMs在儿科急症护理中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Creating Value Together: A Triad of Clinicians, Administrators, and Researchers Overcoming Barriers to Unique Valuation of Acute Care Physical Therapy Where Do We Go From Here? An Editor's Update on the Journal Exploring the Addition of Simulation-Based Learning Experiences to Prepare Student Physical Therapist Assistants for Inpatient Clinical Experience Mobility Checklist for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and a Femoral Intra-aortic Balloon Pump
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1