The Epitome of Evil: On the Study of Antisemitism in Cold War Eastern Europe and Beyond

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY East European Jewish Affairs Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/13501674.2020.1877497
S. Ury
{"title":"The Epitome of Evil: On the Study of Antisemitism in Cold War Eastern Europe and Beyond","authors":"S. Ury","doi":"10.1080/13501674.2020.1877497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While Michael Checinski's anonymously-published piece “USSR and the Politics of Polish Antisemitism, 1956-1968” from the first issue of Soviet Jewish Affairs in 1971 can be read as both an analysis of antisemitism in Communist Poland and as a scholarly artifact that illustrates the manner in which the Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and Jewish communities in the region were studied and understood at the height of the Cold War, it also tells us much about the study of East European Jewry and other, related fields over the past fifty years. Indeed, key parts of Checinski's analysis including its focus on the Soviet Union's anti-Jewish policies, its emphasis on the corrosive if not inherently evil nature of the Soviet Union, and its examination of antisemitism in Poland remain central topics in the study of Soviet and East European Jewry. Moreover, while the Soviet Union has long passed into the annals of history, many of the same historical themes, narrative tropes and scholarly frameworks that once helped researchers frame the study of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe are now critical parts of scholarly efforts to construct and explicate another important sub-field in the realm of Jewish studies, the study of antisemitism, including debates regarding the “New Antisemitism.” In this and other ways, Checinski's essay exemplifies not only the manner in which Cold War tensions, ideologies and anxieties shaped the study of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe for generations but also how they continue to influence the study of Soviet and East European Jewry and other, related fields to this day.","PeriodicalId":42363,"journal":{"name":"East European Jewish Affairs","volume":"50 1","pages":"322 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13501674.2020.1877497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Jewish Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13501674.2020.1877497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT While Michael Checinski's anonymously-published piece “USSR and the Politics of Polish Antisemitism, 1956-1968” from the first issue of Soviet Jewish Affairs in 1971 can be read as both an analysis of antisemitism in Communist Poland and as a scholarly artifact that illustrates the manner in which the Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and Jewish communities in the region were studied and understood at the height of the Cold War, it also tells us much about the study of East European Jewry and other, related fields over the past fifty years. Indeed, key parts of Checinski's analysis including its focus on the Soviet Union's anti-Jewish policies, its emphasis on the corrosive if not inherently evil nature of the Soviet Union, and its examination of antisemitism in Poland remain central topics in the study of Soviet and East European Jewry. Moreover, while the Soviet Union has long passed into the annals of history, many of the same historical themes, narrative tropes and scholarly frameworks that once helped researchers frame the study of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe are now critical parts of scholarly efforts to construct and explicate another important sub-field in the realm of Jewish studies, the study of antisemitism, including debates regarding the “New Antisemitism.” In this and other ways, Checinski's essay exemplifies not only the manner in which Cold War tensions, ideologies and anxieties shaped the study of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe for generations but also how they continue to influence the study of Soviet and East European Jewry and other, related fields to this day.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邪恶的缩影:冷战时期东欧及其他地区反犹主义研究
摘要尽管迈克尔·切辛斯基(Michael Checinski)在1971年第一期《苏联犹太事务》(Sovier Jewish Affairs)上匿名发表的文章《苏联与波兰反犹太主义政治,1956-1968》,既可以被解读为对共产主义波兰反犹主义的分析,东欧和该地区的犹太人社区是在冷战最激烈的时候研究和了解的,这也告诉了我们过去五十年来对东欧犹太人和其他相关领域的研究。事实上,切辛斯基分析的关键部分,包括对苏联反犹太政策的关注,对苏联腐蚀性(如果不是本质上邪恶的话)的强调,以及对波兰反犹太主义的考察,仍然是研究苏联和东欧犹太人的中心话题。此外,尽管苏联早已载入史册,但许多曾经帮助研究人员构建苏联和东欧研究的历史主题、叙事比喻和学术框架,现在都是构建和阐释犹太研究领域另一个重要子领域——反犹太主义研究——的学术努力的关键部分,包括关于“新反犹太主义”的辩论。在这方面和其他方面,切辛斯基的文章不仅展示了冷战紧张局势、意识形态和焦虑如何影响了几代人对苏联和东欧的研究,还展示了它们如何继续影响苏东犹太人和其他相关领域的研究,直到今天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“To reconstruct this period of martyrdom and heroism”: The Jewish Historical Institute and the Ringelblum Archive, 1946–1989 Slovak-language books published in 2018–2021 Jewish Emancipation: A History across Five Centuries Les Survivants: Les Juifs de Pologne depuis la Shoah The dual path of historian Artur Eisenbach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1