Control Beliefs and Dehumanization: Targets with an Internal Locus of Control are Perceived as being More Human than External Targets

IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Swiss Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2017-03-21 DOI:10.1024/1421-0185/a000194
Benoît Testé
{"title":"Control Beliefs and Dehumanization: Targets with an Internal Locus of Control are Perceived as being More Human than External Targets","authors":"Benoît Testé","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research examined the impact of the expression of internal versus external control beliefs on attributions of humanness. Building on previous findings on the cultural norm of internality and the dehumanization of others in social perceptions, we hypothesized that, in a Western society, an individual’s expression of an internal locus of control (i.e., internality) results in a greater degree of humanization of that individual by others than an individual’s expression of an external locus of control (i.e., externality). Two studies examined the effect of a target’s expression of internality (vs. externality) on the attribution or denial of humanness to that target. We measured the targets’ degree of humanization via the mentalization of each target, assessed using the Mind Attribution Scale, and via attributions of uniquely vs. nonuniquely human characteristics (emotions in Study 1, traits in Study 2). Participants also judged the target’s likability. In line with our hypothesis, the target’s expression of internality (compared to externality) consistently resulted in the participants making stronger attributions of humanness to the target. In addition, covariance analyses showed that the participants ascribed more humanness to targets with an internal than with an external locus of control, independent of the target’s likability.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":"76 1","pages":"81–86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The present research examined the impact of the expression of internal versus external control beliefs on attributions of humanness. Building on previous findings on the cultural norm of internality and the dehumanization of others in social perceptions, we hypothesized that, in a Western society, an individual’s expression of an internal locus of control (i.e., internality) results in a greater degree of humanization of that individual by others than an individual’s expression of an external locus of control (i.e., externality). Two studies examined the effect of a target’s expression of internality (vs. externality) on the attribution or denial of humanness to that target. We measured the targets’ degree of humanization via the mentalization of each target, assessed using the Mind Attribution Scale, and via attributions of uniquely vs. nonuniquely human characteristics (emotions in Study 1, traits in Study 2). Participants also judged the target’s likability. In line with our hypothesis, the target’s expression of internality (compared to externality) consistently resulted in the participants making stronger attributions of humanness to the target. In addition, covariance analyses showed that the participants ascribed more humanness to targets with an internal than with an external locus of control, independent of the target’s likability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控制信念与非人性化:具有内部控制点的目标被认为比外部目标更人性化
本研究考察了内部控制信念和外部控制信念的表达对人性归因的影响。基于先前关于内在性的文化规范和社会观念中他人的非人性化的发现,我们假设,在西方社会中,个人对内部控制点(即内在性)的表达比个人对外部控制点(即外部性)的表达更能导致他人对该个人的人性化程度。两项研究考察了目标的内在性(相对于外在性)表达对目标的人性归因或否认的影响。我们通过每个目标的心理化来测量目标的人性化程度,使用心理归因量表进行评估,并通过独特与非独特人类特征的归因(研究1中的情绪,研究2中的特征)。参与者还判断目标的讨人喜欢程度。与我们的假设一致,目标的内在性表达(与外部性相比)始终导致参与者对目标的人性有更强的归因。此外,协方差分析表明,与目标的可爱度无关,参与者认为具有内部控制点的目标比具有外部控制点的目标更具人性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Journal of Psychology
Swiss Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: General, Clinical, Social, Organizational, Developmental, Personality, and Biological Psychology.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural and Environmental Influences on Facial Emotional Discrimination Sensitivity in 9-Year-Old Children from Swiss and Vietnamese Schools The Psychometric Properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Cognitive Reserve Mitigates Decline in Executive Functioning Following Hepatobiliary Diseases Modeling Value-Based Decision-Making Policies Using Genetic Programming Goals Do Not Buy Well-Being, but They Help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1