Comparative study between the analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block alone and adductor canal with IPACK (interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block for knee surgeries

IF 0.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2022.2124787
Shabayek, Fahmy Saad Latif Eskandar, Sahar Mohamed Kamal Hasanin
{"title":"Comparative study between the analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block alone and adductor canal with IPACK (interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block for knee surgeries","authors":"Shabayek, Fahmy Saad Latif Eskandar, Sahar Mohamed Kamal Hasanin","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2022.2124787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Knee surgeries are needed in a wide range of patients, from young athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injuries up to old patients with comorbidities presenting for arthroscopy up to total knee replacement procedures. The trend is fast track knee surgery with early ambulation and hospital discharge, so analgesic options of neuraxial blocks and main nerve blocks are less attractive due to the unavoidable muscle weakness. In this study, the benefit of pure sensory nerve block could be reached. Aim of the study To compare the postoperative range of motion and the analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) alone against adductor canal with IPACK (interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block in knee surgeries. Patients and methods The study is a randomized, prospective, comparative study where 50 patients subjected to knee surgeries were randomized into two groups: Group (A): patients in this group received ultrasound-guided ACB only; Group (AB): under ultrasound guide, patients in this group received a combined ACB and IPACK block at the start of surgery. Results Regarding pain control over the first 24hours following surgery, range of motion and walking distance; there were statistical differences between both groups. When demographic information such age, sex, BMI, and ASA scores were examined between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference between them (p-value > 0.05). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of opioid needs or consumption. Conclusion Regardless of the good analgesic effect of ACB, patients who received a combination of ACB and IPACK blocks have experienced a better pain control, a wider range of motion and a longer walking distance following surgery when compared to patients who received ACB alone.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"38 1","pages":"529 - 534"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2022.2124787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Knee surgeries are needed in a wide range of patients, from young athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injuries up to old patients with comorbidities presenting for arthroscopy up to total knee replacement procedures. The trend is fast track knee surgery with early ambulation and hospital discharge, so analgesic options of neuraxial blocks and main nerve blocks are less attractive due to the unavoidable muscle weakness. In this study, the benefit of pure sensory nerve block could be reached. Aim of the study To compare the postoperative range of motion and the analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) alone against adductor canal with IPACK (interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block in knee surgeries. Patients and methods The study is a randomized, prospective, comparative study where 50 patients subjected to knee surgeries were randomized into two groups: Group (A): patients in this group received ultrasound-guided ACB only; Group (AB): under ultrasound guide, patients in this group received a combined ACB and IPACK block at the start of surgery. Results Regarding pain control over the first 24hours following surgery, range of motion and walking distance; there were statistical differences between both groups. When demographic information such age, sex, BMI, and ASA scores were examined between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference between them (p-value > 0.05). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of opioid needs or consumption. Conclusion Regardless of the good analgesic effect of ACB, patients who received a combination of ACB and IPACK blocks have experienced a better pain control, a wider range of motion and a longer walking distance following surgery when compared to patients who received ACB alone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单纯内收管阻滞与IPACK(腘动脉与膝关节囊间隙)阻滞在膝关节手术中镇痛效果的比较研究
背景膝关节手术需要广泛的患者,从前交叉韧带损伤的年轻运动员到关节镜下出现合并症的老年患者,再到全膝关节置换术。趋势是快速通道膝关节手术,早期下床和出院,因此神经轴阻滞和主神经阻滞的镇痛选择由于不可避免的肌肉无力而不那么有吸引力。在本研究中,可以获得纯感觉神经阻滞的益处。目的比较单纯内收管阻滞(ACB)与膝腘动脉与膝囊间隙阻滞(IPACK)在膝关节手术中对内收管的术后活动范围及镇痛效果。患者和方法:本研究是一项随机、前瞻性、比较研究,将50例膝关节手术患者随机分为两组:a组:该组患者仅接受超声引导下ACB;AB组:在超声引导下,手术开始时给予ACB + IPACK联合阻滞。结果术后24小时疼痛控制、活动范围和步行距离;两组间有统计学差异。两组间年龄、性别、BMI、ASA评分等人口学信息比较,差异无统计学意义(p值bb0 0.05)。此外,在阿片类药物的需求或消费方面,各组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论尽管ACB具有良好的镇痛效果,但与单独接受ACB的患者相比,联合接受ACB和IPACK阻滞的患者在术后有更好的疼痛控制、更大的活动范围和更长的步行距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1