Tweeting for Latinos? Legislative Communication in the 115th U.S. House of Representatives

Giovanny D. Pleites-Hernandez
{"title":"Tweeting for Latinos? Legislative Communication in the 115th U.S. House of Representatives","authors":"Giovanny D. Pleites-Hernandez","doi":"10.1080/07343469.2022.2129522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores whether legislators in the U.S. House of Representatives talk about the issues important to Latinos on Twitter. Other work has emphasized the importance of descriptive representation for the substantive advancement of the interests of minority constituents. Building on that work, I argue that Latino legislators are more likely than their non-Latino peers to discuss issues important to the Latino community. In addition, given majoritarian constraints and work showing how minority legislators are marginalized in the legislative process, I argue that minority legislators – Latinos included – are more likely to post symbolic messages than their colleagues because they are not able to change the status quo and advance the interests of their co-ethnic/racial constituents. I explore these hypotheses using data collected from the Twitter profiles of members of the 115th U.S. House of Representatives. After accounting for other factors, I find that Latino legislators are more likely to post about immigration and Hurricane Maria during the 115th Congress. I also find that Latino legislators are more likely to post symbolic messages when communicating with the public. Both of these findings corroborate the notion of minority distinctiveness and add to our understanding of Latino representation, minority behavior, and legislative communication.","PeriodicalId":41473,"journal":{"name":"Congress & The Presidency-A Journal of Capital Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congress & The Presidency-A Journal of Capital Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07343469.2022.2129522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article explores whether legislators in the U.S. House of Representatives talk about the issues important to Latinos on Twitter. Other work has emphasized the importance of descriptive representation for the substantive advancement of the interests of minority constituents. Building on that work, I argue that Latino legislators are more likely than their non-Latino peers to discuss issues important to the Latino community. In addition, given majoritarian constraints and work showing how minority legislators are marginalized in the legislative process, I argue that minority legislators – Latinos included – are more likely to post symbolic messages than their colleagues because they are not able to change the status quo and advance the interests of their co-ethnic/racial constituents. I explore these hypotheses using data collected from the Twitter profiles of members of the 115th U.S. House of Representatives. After accounting for other factors, I find that Latino legislators are more likely to post about immigration and Hurricane Maria during the 115th Congress. I also find that Latino legislators are more likely to post symbolic messages when communicating with the public. Both of these findings corroborate the notion of minority distinctiveness and add to our understanding of Latino representation, minority behavior, and legislative communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为拉丁美洲人发推特?第115届美国众议院的立法交流
摘要本文探讨了美国众议院议员是否在推特上谈论对拉丁裔人重要的问题。其他工作强调了描述性表述对实质性促进少数族裔选民利益的重要性。在这项工作的基础上,我认为拉丁裔立法者比非拉丁裔同龄人更有可能讨论对拉丁裔社区重要的问题。此外,考虑到多数派的限制和表明少数族裔立法者在立法过程中如何被边缘化的工作,我认为少数族裔立法人员——包括拉丁裔——比他们的同事更有可能发布象征性的信息,因为他们无法改变现状,也无法促进其同族/种族选民的利益。我使用从美国第115届众议院议员的推特个人资料中收集的数据来探索这些假设。在考虑了其他因素后,我发现拉丁裔立法者更有可能在第115届国会期间发布关于移民和飓风玛丽亚的帖子。我还发现,拉丁裔立法者在与公众沟通时更有可能发布象征性的信息。这两项发现都证实了少数族裔独特性的概念,并增加了我们对拉丁裔代表性、少数族裔行为和立法沟通的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Broadening Perspectives in Studies of American Governance Morgan, Iwan. FDR: Transforming the Presidency and Renewing America McKay, Amy Melissa. Stealth Lobbying: Interest Group Influence and Health Care Reform Studying Bureaucracy in a Diverse Democracy Opportunities for Legislative Influence? Latinos and Committee Participation in the U.S. Congress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1