Effects of different drying methods and storage conditions on the reduction of Escherichia coli and the quality parameters of barley sprouts

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Korean Journal of Food Preservation Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.11002/kjfp.2022.29.7.1047
Song-Yi Choi, Hyobeen Chae, Injun Hwang, Jeong-Eun Hyun, W. Seo, Se-Ri Kim
{"title":"Effects of different drying methods and storage conditions on the\n reduction of Escherichia coli and the quality parameters of\n barley sprouts","authors":"Song-Yi Choi, Hyobeen Chae, Injun Hwang, Jeong-Eun Hyun, W. Seo, Se-Ri Kim","doi":"10.11002/kjfp.2022.29.7.1047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Due to their high nutritional value and functional content, barley sprouts are\n commonly ground into powder for human use. This study investigated the effect of\n drying methods, viz., hot-air drying (HAD), freeze-drying (FD), and infrared\n drying (IRD), and storage conditions for the removal of Escherichia\n coli quality parameters of barley sprouts. Herein, the barley\n sprouts were subjected to HAD, FD, and IRD and stored at different temperatures,\n such as −20, 4, and 25°C, for six months. The changes in the\n colony count of E. coli and food quality indicators, viz.,\n Hunter color, chlorophyll, and saponarin, were measured once a month. The HAD\n and FD were found to reduce E. coli from 7 log CFU/g to 4 log\n CFU/g, whereas IRD eliminated them (limit of detection ⟨ 1 log CFU/g). In\n the case of HAD, the E. coli counts and the quality of dried\n leaves did not change significantly (p>0.05) for six months under all storage\n conditions. Freeze-dried leaves stored at 25 and 4°C showed a decrease in\n E. coli counts from 4.5 to 1.2-1.5 log CFU/g after six\n months (p⟨0.05), and no significant change in quality during their\n storage was observed (p⟩0.05). In the case of infrared-dried samples,\n E. coli was not detected even after six months under all\n storage conditions, storing at −20°C was the best condition for\n the chlorophyll content and Hunter color (p⟨0.05). On the other hand, the\n content of saponarin was constant regardless of the drying method and\n storage.\n","PeriodicalId":17875,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Food Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2022.29.7.1047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to their high nutritional value and functional content, barley sprouts are commonly ground into powder for human use. This study investigated the effect of drying methods, viz., hot-air drying (HAD), freeze-drying (FD), and infrared drying (IRD), and storage conditions for the removal of Escherichia coli quality parameters of barley sprouts. Herein, the barley sprouts were subjected to HAD, FD, and IRD and stored at different temperatures, such as −20, 4, and 25°C, for six months. The changes in the colony count of E. coli and food quality indicators, viz., Hunter color, chlorophyll, and saponarin, were measured once a month. The HAD and FD were found to reduce E. coli from 7 log CFU/g to 4 log CFU/g, whereas IRD eliminated them (limit of detection ⟨ 1 log CFU/g). In the case of HAD, the E. coli counts and the quality of dried leaves did not change significantly (p>0.05) for six months under all storage conditions. Freeze-dried leaves stored at 25 and 4°C showed a decrease in E. coli counts from 4.5 to 1.2-1.5 log CFU/g after six months (p⟨0.05), and no significant change in quality during their storage was observed (p⟩0.05). In the case of infrared-dried samples, E. coli was not detected even after six months under all storage conditions, storing at −20°C was the best condition for the chlorophyll content and Hunter color (p⟨0.05). On the other hand, the content of saponarin was constant regardless of the drying method and storage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同干燥方法和贮藏条件对大肠杆菌还原及大麦芽品质参数的影响
由于大麦芽的营养价值和功能含量高,人们通常将其磨成粉末供人使用。本研究考察了热风干燥(HAD)、冷冻干燥(FD)和红外干燥(IRD)等干燥方法以及储存条件对去除大麦芽大肠杆菌质量参数的影响。在此,对大麦芽进行HAD、FD和IRD处理,并在不同温度(如−20、4和25°C)下储存6个月。每月测量一次大肠杆菌菌落计数和食品质量指标的变化,即亨特色、叶绿素和saponarin。HAD和FD可将大肠杆菌从7 log CFU/g减少到4 log CFU/g,而IRD可消除它们(检测极限为1 log CFU/g)。在HAD的情况下,在所有储存条件下,大肠杆菌计数和干叶质量在六个月内没有显著变化(p>0.05)。在25和4°C下储存的冷冻干燥叶片在6个月后显示大肠杆菌计数从4.5 log CFU/g下降到1.2-1.5 log CFU/g(p⟨0.05),并且在储存过程中没有观察到质量的显著变化(p \102.17; 0.05,贮藏在−20°C是叶绿素含量和Hunter颜色的最佳条件(p⟨0.05)。另一方面,无论干燥方法和贮藏方式如何,皂角苷的含量都是恒定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Food Preservation
Korean Journal of Food Preservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote and encourage the advancement of quantitative improvement for the storage, processing and distribution of food and its related disciplines, theory and research on its application. Topics covered include: Food Preservation and Packaging Food and Food Material distribution Fresh-cut Food Manufacturing Food processing Technology Food Functional Properties Food Quality / Safety.
期刊最新文献
Effect of gamma irradiation on post-harvest quality of king oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii) Effectiveness of controlled atmosphere container on the freshness of exported PMRsupia melon Effects of impact by mechanical harvesting on storability of onions (Allium cepa L.) Evaluation of physicochemical and biological properties of python fat (Python bivittatus) Efficacy of Elaeagnus umbellata leaves on prevention of cadmium-induced toxicity in HepG2 cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1