Crisis Communication on Social Media: What Types of COVID-19 Messages Get the Attention?

IF 3.4 4区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Cornell Hospitality Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.1177/19389655211028143
Linchi Kwok, Jungwoo Lee, Spring H. Han
{"title":"Crisis Communication on Social Media: What Types of COVID-19 Messages Get the Attention?","authors":"Linchi Kwok, Jungwoo Lee, Spring H. Han","doi":"10.1177/19389655211028143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed internet users’ attention to hospitality companies’ COVID-19 messages on social media. We used 657 Facebook and 754 Twitter messages initiated by eight of the world’s largest hotel chains between January and mid-June 2020 for the exploratory analysis. Under the situational crisis communication theory, the analysis reveals that hotels shared five types of COVID-19 (Prevention, Reminding, Ingratiation, Victimage, and Updates) versus Non-COVID-19 messages. Descriptive analysis and a series of t test, analysis of variance, and post hoc analyses reveal that hotels did not share any COVID-19 information until March 2020. Moreover, COVID-19 messages only accounted for about 20% of all messages, among which hotels shared Ingratiation and Updates messages most often. COVID-19 messages received more reactions, comments, and shares/retweets than Non-COVID-19 messages on both Facebook and Twitter, indicating the attention paid to the COVID-19 messages posted on a business’ social media page, which can help businesses spread the information in their networks. Specifically, Prevention, Reminding (although underused), Ingratiation, Updates, and messages with photos and videos received more attention. Such findings extend the crisis communication literature and help businesses develop effective communication strategies to engage their stakeholders on social media during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47888,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Hospitality Quarterly","volume":"63 1","pages":"528 - 543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/19389655211028143","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Hospitality Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655211028143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

This study assessed internet users’ attention to hospitality companies’ COVID-19 messages on social media. We used 657 Facebook and 754 Twitter messages initiated by eight of the world’s largest hotel chains between January and mid-June 2020 for the exploratory analysis. Under the situational crisis communication theory, the analysis reveals that hotels shared five types of COVID-19 (Prevention, Reminding, Ingratiation, Victimage, and Updates) versus Non-COVID-19 messages. Descriptive analysis and a series of t test, analysis of variance, and post hoc analyses reveal that hotels did not share any COVID-19 information until March 2020. Moreover, COVID-19 messages only accounted for about 20% of all messages, among which hotels shared Ingratiation and Updates messages most often. COVID-19 messages received more reactions, comments, and shares/retweets than Non-COVID-19 messages on both Facebook and Twitter, indicating the attention paid to the COVID-19 messages posted on a business’ social media page, which can help businesses spread the information in their networks. Specifically, Prevention, Reminding (although underused), Ingratiation, Updates, and messages with photos and videos received more attention. Such findings extend the crisis communication literature and help businesses develop effective communication strategies to engage their stakeholders on social media during the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体上的危机传播:什么类型的新冠肺炎信息引起关注?
这项研究评估了互联网用户对酒店公司在社交媒体上发布的新冠肺炎信息的关注程度。我们使用了2020年1月至6月中旬期间全球八家最大的连锁酒店发起的657条Facebook和754条Twitter消息进行探索性分析。根据情境危机沟通理论,分析发现酒店与非酒店共享五种新型冠状病毒信息(预防、提醒、讨好、受害和更新)。描述性分析和一系列t检验、方差分析和事后分析显示,酒店直到2020年3月才共享任何COVID-19信息。此外,COVID-19消息仅占所有消息的20%左右,其中酒店最常共享的是“Ingratiation”和“Updates”消息。在脸书和推特上,新冠肺炎信息的反应、评论、分享/转发量都超过了“非新冠肺炎”信息,这表明企业社交媒体页面上发布的新冠肺炎信息受到了关注,这有助于企业在其网络中传播信息。具体来说,预防、提醒(尽管未充分利用)、讨好、更新和带有照片和视频的信息受到了更多的关注。这些发现扩展了危机沟通文献,并帮助企业制定有效的沟通战略,以便在大流行期间与利益攸关方接触社交媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Cornell Hospitality Quarterly (CQ) publishes research in all business disciplines that contribute to management practice in the hospitality and tourism industries. Like the hospitality industry itself, the editorial content of CQ is broad, including topics in strategic management, consumer behavior, marketing, financial management, real-estate, accounting, operations management, planning and design, human resources management, applied economics, information technology, international development, communications, travel and tourism, and more general management. The audience is academics, hospitality managers, developers, consultants, investors, and students.
期刊最新文献
Job Mobility in the Time of Recovery: An Examination of How Job Threats Influence Turnover Intentions Consumer Reactions to Drip Pricing: The Moderating Effect of Price Fairness in the Sharing Economy Accommodation Mergers and Acquisitions, CEO Compensation, and Corporate Governance in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry Hotel Employee Engagement During the Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Approach The Influence of Hotel Characteristics on Debt Servicing and Default in the U.S. Lodging Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1