The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance–Third Edition: Internal Reliability, Interrater Reliability, and Test–Retest Reliability

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Behavioral Disorders Pub Date : 2020-11-13 DOI:10.1177/0198742920969152
Jacqueline N. Huscroft-D’Angelo, Jessica Wery, Jodie Martin, Corey D. Pierce, Lindy Crawford
{"title":"The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance–Third Edition: Internal Reliability, Interrater Reliability, and Test–Retest Reliability","authors":"Jacqueline N. Huscroft-D’Angelo, Jessica Wery, Jodie Martin, Corey D. Pierce, Lindy Crawford","doi":"10.1177/0198742920969152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance–Third Edition Rating Scale (SAED-3 RS; Epstein et al.) is a standardized, norm-referenced measure designed to aid in the identification process by providing useful data to professionals determining eligibility of students with an emotional disturbance (ED). Three studies are reported to address the reliability of the SAED-3 RS. Study 1 investigated the internal reliability of the SAED-3 RS using data from a nationally representative sample of 1,430 students and 441 with ED. Study 2 examined interrater reliability between 123 pairs of educators who had worked with the student for at least 2 months. Study 3 assessed the test–retest reliability over a 2-week period to determine stability of the SAED-3 RS. Across all studies, scores collected from the SAED-3 RS were determined to be a reliable, stable for measuring the emotional and behavioral functioning of students. Specifically, the averaged coefficient alpha for internal consistency ranged from .79 to .92 for each subscale and .96 for the composite score; interrater reliability coefficients ranged from .77 to .89 for each subscale and .89 for the composite score, and test–retest reliability coefficients ranged from .79 to .92 for each subscale and .96 for the composite score. Limitations, future research and implications for use of the SAED-3 RS are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47249,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Disorders","volume":"47 1","pages":"28 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0198742920969152","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920969152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance–Third Edition Rating Scale (SAED-3 RS; Epstein et al.) is a standardized, norm-referenced measure designed to aid in the identification process by providing useful data to professionals determining eligibility of students with an emotional disturbance (ED). Three studies are reported to address the reliability of the SAED-3 RS. Study 1 investigated the internal reliability of the SAED-3 RS using data from a nationally representative sample of 1,430 students and 441 with ED. Study 2 examined interrater reliability between 123 pairs of educators who had worked with the student for at least 2 months. Study 3 assessed the test–retest reliability over a 2-week period to determine stability of the SAED-3 RS. Across all studies, scores collected from the SAED-3 RS were determined to be a reliable, stable for measuring the emotional and behavioral functioning of students. Specifically, the averaged coefficient alpha for internal consistency ranged from .79 to .92 for each subscale and .96 for the composite score; interrater reliability coefficients ranged from .77 to .89 for each subscale and .89 for the composite score, and test–retest reliability coefficients ranged from .79 to .92 for each subscale and .96 for the composite score. Limitations, future research and implications for use of the SAED-3 RS are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪困扰评估量表第三版:内部信度、量表间信度和重测信度
情绪障碍评估量表-第三版评定量表(SAED-3 RS;Epstein等人)是一种标准化、规范参考的测量方法,旨在通过向专业人员提供有用的数据来确定情绪障碍学生的资格,从而帮助识别过程。据报道,有三项研究涉及SAED-3 RS的可靠性。研究1使用1430名学生和441名ED学生的全国代表性样本的数据调查了SAED-3 RS.研究2调查了123对与该学生共事至少2个月的教育工作者之间的参与者间可靠性。研究3评估了为期2周的测试-再测试可靠性,以确定SAED-3 RS的稳定性。在所有研究中,从SAED-3 RS收集的分数被确定为测量学生情绪和行为功能的可靠、稳定的分数。具体而言,内部一致性的平均系数α在每个分量表的.79至.92之间,在综合得分的.96之间;每个分量表的测验者间信度系数为.77至.89,综合得分为.89,每个分量表和综合得分的测试-再测试信度系数为0.79至.92。讨论了SAED-3 RS的局限性、未来研究和使用意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Behavioral Disorders is sent to all members of the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (CCBD), a division of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). All CCBD members must first be members of CEC.
期刊最新文献
A Reanalysis: SRSS-IE Internalizing Cut Scores to Support Data-Informed Decision-Making Efforts in Elementary Schools Improving Persuasive Writing Outcomes With Technology for Students in an Alternative Special Education Program An Analysis of SRSS-IE Externalizing Cut Scores to Facilitate Data-Informed Decision-Making in K–12 Schools Disability Status and Early Suicide Risk Among Children With and Without a History of Suspensions/Expulsions Kuwaiti Teachers’ Classroom Behavior Management Practices, Experiences, and Beliefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1