Outgrowing Speech Sound Disorders

Q4 Social Sciences Word of Mouth Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI:10.1177/10483950221101453a
C. Westby
{"title":"Outgrowing Speech Sound Disorders","authors":"C. Westby","doi":"10.1177/10483950221101453a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinicians are often asked whether a child will outgrow speech errors without intervention. There are two potential outcomes for children with speech sound disorders (SSDs): normalization or long-term, persistent SSD (Roulstone et al., 2009; Wren et al., 2016). Understanding whether children outgrow speech errors without intervention is of clinical importance because there are fewer speech-language pathologists (SLPs) than the number of children who need their services, and there are often long waiting lists. Access to speechlanguage pathology services can impact children, their families, and society (McGill et al., 2020). Some children who do not receive speech-language pathology services may be able to resolve their speech errors at a later time point, whereas other children continue to show a large number of errors even when they receive belated therapy. For these latter children, delays in services or insufficient intervention frequency may lead to poor speech outcomes affecting children’s education, social development, and occupational prospects (McLeod et al., 2019). This study investigated four consistently reported risk factors of SSD related to children’s speech and language profiles (low stimulability, intelligibility, presence of atypical errors, and expressive language difficulties) and how these factors related to children’s time to normalization. This article presents the findings of a naturalistic cohort study investigating speech normalization and normalization rates in Cantonesespeaking preschool children in Hong Kong, China, who may be at risk for SSD. The objectives of this study were to quantify speech normalization rates at 2.5-year follow-up and to investigate predictors of time to normalization. The researchers examined (a) children who resolved nonadult realizations of speech sounds (i.e., had normalized production of speech sounds) and (b) those who had persisting speech sound difficulties (did not normalize) over 2.5 years. Method","PeriodicalId":39491,"journal":{"name":"Word of Mouth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word of Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221101453a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Clinicians are often asked whether a child will outgrow speech errors without intervention. There are two potential outcomes for children with speech sound disorders (SSDs): normalization or long-term, persistent SSD (Roulstone et al., 2009; Wren et al., 2016). Understanding whether children outgrow speech errors without intervention is of clinical importance because there are fewer speech-language pathologists (SLPs) than the number of children who need their services, and there are often long waiting lists. Access to speechlanguage pathology services can impact children, their families, and society (McGill et al., 2020). Some children who do not receive speech-language pathology services may be able to resolve their speech errors at a later time point, whereas other children continue to show a large number of errors even when they receive belated therapy. For these latter children, delays in services or insufficient intervention frequency may lead to poor speech outcomes affecting children’s education, social development, and occupational prospects (McLeod et al., 2019). This study investigated four consistently reported risk factors of SSD related to children’s speech and language profiles (low stimulability, intelligibility, presence of atypical errors, and expressive language difficulties) and how these factors related to children’s time to normalization. This article presents the findings of a naturalistic cohort study investigating speech normalization and normalization rates in Cantonesespeaking preschool children in Hong Kong, China, who may be at risk for SSD. The objectives of this study were to quantify speech normalization rates at 2.5-year follow-up and to investigate predictors of time to normalization. The researchers examined (a) children who resolved nonadult realizations of speech sounds (i.e., had normalized production of speech sounds) and (b) those who had persisting speech sound difficulties (did not normalize) over 2.5 years. Method
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发育不良的语音障碍
临床医生经常被问到,如果不进行干预,孩子是否会因言语错误而长大。患有语音障碍(SSD)的儿童有两种潜在的结果:正常化或长期、持续的SSD(Roulstone等人,2009;Wren等人,2016)。了解儿童是否在没有干预的情况下长大后会出现言语错误具有临床重要性,因为言语语言病理学家(SLP)的人数少于需要他们服务的儿童人数,而且等待他们的名单往往很长。获得语言病理学服务会影响儿童、他们的家庭和社会(McGill等人,2020)。一些没有接受言语语言病理学服务的儿童可能能够在以后的时间点解决他们的言语错误,而其他儿童即使接受了迟来的治疗,也会继续表现出大量的错误。对于后一类儿童,服务延迟或干预频率不足可能导致言语效果不佳,影响儿童的教育、社会发展和职业前景(McLeod等人,2019)。本研究调查了与儿童言语和语言特征相关的四个持续报道的SSD风险因素(低刺激性、可理解性、非典型错误的存在和表达语言困难),以及这些因素如何与儿童的正常化时间相关。本文介绍了一项自然队列研究的结果,该研究调查了中国香港学龄前儿童的言语正常化和正常化率,他们可能有SSD的风险。本研究的目的是量化2.5年随访时的语音正常化率,并研究正常化时间的预测因素。研究人员检查了(a)解决了非成年人语音实现(即语音产生正常化)的儿童和(b)在2.5年内持续存在语音困难(未正常化)。方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Word of Mouth
Word of Mouth Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: ...helps frontline clinicians keep up with the latest trends in working with school-age children. Each 16-page issue of bare-bones, down-to-earth information includes reviews, resources, idea swap, and short bits.
期刊最新文献
Using Conversation to Promote Language for Comprehension Syntactic Factors in Stuttering Bundle of Learning Chatbots and Neurodivergence Learning to Explain and Generalize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1