Real-world evidence of daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: A single-center experience in Taiwan focusing on efficacy

Ling-Jung Chiu, C. Kuo, M. Ma, Chun- Liao, Hung-Lin Liu, M. Wang
{"title":"Real-world evidence of daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: A single-center experience in Taiwan focusing on efficacy","authors":"Ling-Jung Chiu, C. Kuo, M. Ma, Chun- Liao, Hung-Lin Liu, M. Wang","doi":"10.4103/ejcrp.ejcrp-d-22-00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Daratumumab (DARA) introduced in the multiple myeloma (MM) treatment strategy, producing a direct antitumor activity and immunomodulatory effects in phase I-II trial GEN501. In the POLLUX trial, the combination of DARA with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) reported impressive response rates. In Taiwan, the Dara-based regimen was supported by National Health Insurance recently, but there were no real-world data in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: We described a heavily pretreated group of 31 patients with MM who had received one or more lines of therapy to receive DRd therapy after Taiwan Food and Drug Administration approval. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: After a median follow-up of 22.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16–29.73) months, the median time to first response was 59 days (95% CI: 24.8–81.6). Median PFS was 24.082 months (95% CI: 14–33) in patients who received DRd therapy. Twelve-month PFS showed 80.7% in the DRd group. Patients who achieved at least very good partial response (VGPR) had longer median PFS (39.8 months) than those who achieved partial response (7.35 months). The complete response rate and VGPR were 35.5% and 29%, respectively. About 22.6% of patients had a partial response. The average treatment duration was 11.48 ± 7 months. Patient experienced biological relapse at 5.88 months after discontinuing DRd treatment. Conclusion: After DRd treatment for 11.48 months, most of the patients showed biological relapse at 5.88 months, suggesting the good efficacy; however, the need of a longer maintenance treatment of DARA. The median PFS in real-world setting was consistent with the POLLUX trial regardless of more patients with high cytogenetic risks. Patient who could achieve deep response above VGPR had better PFS than those who did not.","PeriodicalId":31219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"19 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejcrp.ejcrp-d-22-00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Daratumumab (DARA) introduced in the multiple myeloma (MM) treatment strategy, producing a direct antitumor activity and immunomodulatory effects in phase I-II trial GEN501. In the POLLUX trial, the combination of DARA with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) reported impressive response rates. In Taiwan, the Dara-based regimen was supported by National Health Insurance recently, but there were no real-world data in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: We described a heavily pretreated group of 31 patients with MM who had received one or more lines of therapy to receive DRd therapy after Taiwan Food and Drug Administration approval. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: After a median follow-up of 22.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16–29.73) months, the median time to first response was 59 days (95% CI: 24.8–81.6). Median PFS was 24.082 months (95% CI: 14–33) in patients who received DRd therapy. Twelve-month PFS showed 80.7% in the DRd group. Patients who achieved at least very good partial response (VGPR) had longer median PFS (39.8 months) than those who achieved partial response (7.35 months). The complete response rate and VGPR were 35.5% and 29%, respectively. About 22.6% of patients had a partial response. The average treatment duration was 11.48 ± 7 months. Patient experienced biological relapse at 5.88 months after discontinuing DRd treatment. Conclusion: After DRd treatment for 11.48 months, most of the patients showed biological relapse at 5.88 months, suggesting the good efficacy; however, the need of a longer maintenance treatment of DARA. The median PFS in real-world setting was consistent with the POLLUX trial regardless of more patients with high cytogenetic risks. Patient who could achieve deep response above VGPR had better PFS than those who did not.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
达拉图单抗-来那度胺-地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的真实证据:台湾单中心疗效研究
背景:Daratumumab (DARA)被引入多发性骨髓瘤(MM)治疗策略,在I-II期试验GEN501中产生了直接的抗肿瘤活性和免疫调节作用。在pollx试验中,DARA联合来那度胺和地塞米松(DRd)报告了令人印象深刻的反应率。在台湾,基于dara的方案最近得到了国民健康保险的支持,但在台湾没有真实的数据。材料和方法:我们描述了一组重度预处理的31例MM患者,他们接受了一种或多种治疗,经台湾食品药品监督管理局批准后接受DRd治疗。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:中位随访时间为22.87(95%置信区间[CI]: 16-29.73)个月,至首次缓解的中位时间为59天(95% CI: 24.8-81.6)。接受DRd治疗的患者中位PFS为24.082个月(95% CI: 14-33)。DRd组12个月PFS为80.7%。获得至少非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)的患者比获得部分缓解(7.35个月)的患者有更长的中位PFS(39.8个月)。完全缓解率为35.5%,VGPR为29%。约22.6%的患者部分缓解。平均治疗时间11.48±7个月。患者在停止DRd治疗后5.88个月出现生物学复发。结论:DRd治疗11.48个月后,大部分患者在5.88个月时出现生物学复发,疗效较好;然而,DARA需要较长时间的维持治疗。现实环境中的中位PFS与pollx试验一致,无论更多的患者具有高细胞遗传学风险。能达到VGPR以上深度反应的患者比不能达到深度反应的患者有更好的PFS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP aims to provide an exchange forum for the cancer researchers and practitioners to publish their timely findings in oncologic disciplines. The scope of the Journal covers basic, translational and clinical research, Cancer Biology, Cancer Immunotherapy, Hemato-oncology, Digestive cancer, Urinary tumor, Germ cell tumor, Breast cancer, Lung cancer, Head and Neck Cancer in a vast range of cancer related topics. The Journal also seeks to enhance and advance the cancer care standards in order to provide cancer patients the best care during the treatments.
期刊最新文献
Expert Consensus on Molecular Tumor Boards in Taiwan: Joint Position Paper by the Taiwan Oncology Society and the Taiwan Society of Pathology A juvenile female with ductal carcinoma In situ arising from a fibroadenoma Unfavorable tumor responses to immunotherapy in the liver: Lessons learned from clinical and preclinical studies Promising response with PI3K inhibitor for a patient with heavily pretreated PIK3CA mutation head-and-neck cancer Significance of baseline and changes of tumor markers and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting overall survival for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1