Aspiration mechanical thrombectomy in acute and subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis in the COVID era: challenges and outcome

IF 0.4 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Acta Phlebologica Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.23736/s1593-232x.22.00525-2
A. Karmota, Baker M. Ghoneim, M. Sabry, Sayed Younis
{"title":"Aspiration mechanical thrombectomy in acute and subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis in the COVID era: challenges and outcome","authors":"A. Karmota, Baker M. Ghoneim, M. Sabry, Sayed Younis","doi":"10.23736/s1593-232x.22.00525-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) proved to be effective treatment in deep venous thrombosis (DVT), However, there is some concerns about the associated bleeding risk. We assessed the safety and efficacy including technical and clinical success in resolution of iliofemoral DVT after one session treatment with penumbra aspiration mechanical thrombectomy catheter as an alternative CDT. METHOD(S): This is a retrospective study that was conducted on patients presented to Aseer Central Hospital and Saudi German Hospital in Saudi Arabia from January 2019 to December 2020 with symptomatic acute iliofemoral DVT. Patients were treated with Indigo continuous aspiration mechanical thrombectomy 8 system (Penumbra Inc, Alameda, CA, USA). Secondary end point was treatment complications, DVT recurrence and postphlebetic syndrome occurrence within 1 year follow-up. RESULT(S): Our study included twenty-three patients with sixteen females (59.6%) and seven males (30.4%) with a median age of 38 years (18-60years). Indication for treatment was primary DVT in seventeen patients (73.9%), recurrent DVT in six patients (26.1%). Provoked DVT was present in fifteen patients (65.2%) with nine of them was tested positive for COVID-19 while non provoked DVT in eight patients (4.8%). Seven patients (30.4%) had underlying May-Thurner Syndrome after thrombus removal and needed stenting for left common iliac vein (CIV) and two patients (8.7%) with recurrent DVT has significant residual Left common iliac vein stenosis that needed stenting. Two patient (8.7%) have thrombosis extending to inferior vena cava. Initial technical success using Penumbra was 82.6%. All patients in whom aspiration thrombectomy was not successful underwent further treatment with CDT which was successful in further three cases with failure in one case making overall technical success was 95.7%. Recurrent iliac occlusion after successful recanalization was seen in two patients (8.7%) at 6 months follow up. One patient (4.3%) developed pulmonary embolism that required full anticoagulation with no further treatment. No patient develops postphlebetic syndrome at 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION(S): Penumbra aspiration thrombectomy catheter was safe, effective and promising technique in treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT and allowed definitive treatment in one session with no need for the use of thrombolysis in the majority of cases with no risk for bleeding complications, shorter hospital stay, no need for ICU admission and lower cost. COVID infection does not seem to alter the outcome. Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.","PeriodicalId":41673,"journal":{"name":"Acta Phlebologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Phlebologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s1593-232x.22.00525-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) proved to be effective treatment in deep venous thrombosis (DVT), However, there is some concerns about the associated bleeding risk. We assessed the safety and efficacy including technical and clinical success in resolution of iliofemoral DVT after one session treatment with penumbra aspiration mechanical thrombectomy catheter as an alternative CDT. METHOD(S): This is a retrospective study that was conducted on patients presented to Aseer Central Hospital and Saudi German Hospital in Saudi Arabia from January 2019 to December 2020 with symptomatic acute iliofemoral DVT. Patients were treated with Indigo continuous aspiration mechanical thrombectomy 8 system (Penumbra Inc, Alameda, CA, USA). Secondary end point was treatment complications, DVT recurrence and postphlebetic syndrome occurrence within 1 year follow-up. RESULT(S): Our study included twenty-three patients with sixteen females (59.6%) and seven males (30.4%) with a median age of 38 years (18-60years). Indication for treatment was primary DVT in seventeen patients (73.9%), recurrent DVT in six patients (26.1%). Provoked DVT was present in fifteen patients (65.2%) with nine of them was tested positive for COVID-19 while non provoked DVT in eight patients (4.8%). Seven patients (30.4%) had underlying May-Thurner Syndrome after thrombus removal and needed stenting for left common iliac vein (CIV) and two patients (8.7%) with recurrent DVT has significant residual Left common iliac vein stenosis that needed stenting. Two patient (8.7%) have thrombosis extending to inferior vena cava. Initial technical success using Penumbra was 82.6%. All patients in whom aspiration thrombectomy was not successful underwent further treatment with CDT which was successful in further three cases with failure in one case making overall technical success was 95.7%. Recurrent iliac occlusion after successful recanalization was seen in two patients (8.7%) at 6 months follow up. One patient (4.3%) developed pulmonary embolism that required full anticoagulation with no further treatment. No patient develops postphlebetic syndrome at 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION(S): Penumbra aspiration thrombectomy catheter was safe, effective and promising technique in treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT and allowed definitive treatment in one session with no need for the use of thrombolysis in the majority of cases with no risk for bleeding complications, shorter hospital stay, no need for ICU admission and lower cost. COVID infection does not seem to alter the outcome. Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎时代急性和亚急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的抽吸机械血栓切除术:挑战和结果
背景:导管定向溶栓(CDT)被证明是治疗深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的有效方法,然而,存在一些相关的出血风险。我们评估了安全性和有效性,包括半暗带抽吸机械取栓导管作为替代CDT治疗一次后髂股深静脉血栓的技术和临床成功。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2019年1月至2020年12月在沙特阿拉伯阿西尔中心医院和沙特德国医院就诊的有症状的急性髂股深静脉血栓患者。患者采用Indigo连续抽吸机械取栓系统(Penumbra Inc, Alameda, CA, USA)。次要终点为1年内治疗并发症、深静脉血栓复发及血栓后综合征的发生情况。结果:本研究纳入23例患者,其中女性16例(59.6%),男性7例(30.4%),中位年龄38岁(18-60岁)。治疗指征为原发性DVT 17例(73.9%),复发性DVT 6例(26.1%)。15例患者(65.2%)存在诱发性DVT,其中9例患者COVID-19检测呈阳性,8例患者(4.8%)存在非诱发性DVT。7例(30.4%)患者在血栓清除后存在潜在的May-Thurner综合征,需要行左髂总静脉(CIV)支架置入术;2例(8.7%)复发性DVT患者存在明显的左髂总静脉残留狭窄,需要行支架置入术。2例(8.7%)血栓延伸至下腔静脉。使用半影的初始技术成功率为82.6%。所有吸入性取栓不成功的患者均接受CDT进一步治疗,其中3例成功,1例失败,总技术成功率为95.7%。在6个月的随访中,2例患者(8.7%)在再通成功后复发髂闭塞。1例患者(4.3%)发生肺栓塞,需要全面抗凝治疗,无需进一步治疗。随访1年,无患者出现静脉后综合征。结论:半暗带吸入性取栓导管治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓是一种安全、有效、有发展前景的技术,大多数病例无需溶栓,一次即可完全治疗,无出血并发症风险,住院时间短,无需入住ICU,费用低。COVID感染似乎不会改变结果。版权所有©2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Phlebologica
Acta Phlebologica PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Endovenous laser ablation in treating superficial venous insufficiency: initial experience from southwestern Greece Mini-invasive treatment of acute superficial varicothrombophlebitis of the lower extremities Comment on: "External musculoskeletal compression of the internal jugular vein: a systematic review" Mid-term results of Wallstent in endovascular therapy of chronic iliac veins obstruction: a single center experience The anatomy and physiology of the saphenofemoral junction: the complexity of a venous structure that every phlebologist should be familiar with
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1