{"title":"Taking sides with patients using institutional ethnography","authors":"Caroline Cupit, J. Rankin, N. Armstrong","doi":"10.1108/JOE-12-2019-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this paper is to document the first author's experience of using institutional ethnography (IE) to “take sides” in healthcare research. The authors illustrate the points with data and key findings from a study of cardiovascular disease prevention.,The authors use Dorothy E Smith's IE approach, and particularly the theoretical tool of “standpoint”.,Starting with the development of the study, the authors trouble the researcher's positionality, highlighting tensions between institutional knowledge of “prevention” and other locations where knowledge about patients' health needs materialises. The authors outline how IE's theoretically and methodologically integrated toolkit became a framework for “taking sides” with patients. They describe how the researcher used IE to take a standpoint and map institutional relations from that standpoint. They argue that IE enabled an innovative analysis but also reflect on the challenges of conducting an IE – the conceptual unpicking and (re)thinking, and demarcating boundaries of investigation within an expansive dataset.,This paper illustrates IE's relevance for organisational ethnographers wishing to find a theoretically robust approach to taking sides, and suggests ways in which the IE approach might contribute to improving services, particularly healthcare. It provides an illustration of how taking a patient standpoint was accomplished in practice, and reflects on the challenges involved.","PeriodicalId":44924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Ethnography","volume":"10 1","pages":"21-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Ethnography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-12-2019-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to document the first author's experience of using institutional ethnography (IE) to “take sides” in healthcare research. The authors illustrate the points with data and key findings from a study of cardiovascular disease prevention.,The authors use Dorothy E Smith's IE approach, and particularly the theoretical tool of “standpoint”.,Starting with the development of the study, the authors trouble the researcher's positionality, highlighting tensions between institutional knowledge of “prevention” and other locations where knowledge about patients' health needs materialises. The authors outline how IE's theoretically and methodologically integrated toolkit became a framework for “taking sides” with patients. They describe how the researcher used IE to take a standpoint and map institutional relations from that standpoint. They argue that IE enabled an innovative analysis but also reflect on the challenges of conducting an IE – the conceptual unpicking and (re)thinking, and demarcating boundaries of investigation within an expansive dataset.,This paper illustrates IE's relevance for organisational ethnographers wishing to find a theoretically robust approach to taking sides, and suggests ways in which the IE approach might contribute to improving services, particularly healthcare. It provides an illustration of how taking a patient standpoint was accomplished in practice, and reflects on the challenges involved.
本文的主要目的是记录第一作者使用机构人种学(IE)在医疗保健研究中“站队”的经验。作者用一项心血管疾病预防研究的数据和主要发现来说明这些观点。作者采用了Dorothy E Smith的IE方法,特别是“立场”这一理论工具。从研究的发展开始,作者们对研究人员的立场提出了质疑,强调了“预防”的机构知识与关于患者健康需求的其他知识之间的紧张关系。作者概述了IE在理论和方法上的综合工具包如何成为与患者“站队”的框架。他们描述了研究人员如何使用IE来采取立场并从该立场绘制制度关系。他们认为,IE实现了一种创新的分析,但也反映了实施IE的挑战——概念的拆解和(重新)思考,以及在一个庞大的数据集中划定调查的边界。本文说明了IE与希望找到一种理论上可靠的站队方法的组织民族志学家的相关性,并提出了IE方法可能有助于改善服务,特别是医疗保健的方法。它提供了如何采取病人的立场是在实践中完成的说明,并反映了所涉及的挑战。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Organizational Ethnography (JOE) has been launched to provide an opportunity for scholars, from all social and management science disciplines, to publish over two issues: -high-quality articles from original ethnographic research that contribute to the current and future development of qualitative intellectual knowledge and understanding of the nature of public and private sector work, organization and management -review articles examining the history and development of the contribution of ethnography to qualitative research in social, organization and management studies -articles examining the intellectual, pedagogical and practical use-value of ethnography in organization and management research, management education and management practice, or which extend, critique or challenge past and current theoretical and empirical knowledge claims within one or more of these areas of interest -articles on ethnographically informed research relating to the concepts of organization and organizing in any other wider social and cultural contexts.