Taking sides with patients using institutional ethnography

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT Journal of Organizational Ethnography Pub Date : 2021-02-02 DOI:10.1108/JOE-12-2019-0048
Caroline Cupit, J. Rankin, N. Armstrong
{"title":"Taking sides with patients using institutional ethnography","authors":"Caroline Cupit, J. Rankin, N. Armstrong","doi":"10.1108/JOE-12-2019-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this paper is to document the first author's experience of using institutional ethnography (IE) to “take sides” in healthcare research. The authors illustrate the points with data and key findings from a study of cardiovascular disease prevention.,The authors use Dorothy E Smith's IE approach, and particularly the theoretical tool of “standpoint”.,Starting with the development of the study, the authors trouble the researcher's positionality, highlighting tensions between institutional knowledge of “prevention” and other locations where knowledge about patients' health needs materialises. The authors outline how IE's theoretically and methodologically integrated toolkit became a framework for “taking sides” with patients. They describe how the researcher used IE to take a standpoint and map institutional relations from that standpoint. They argue that IE enabled an innovative analysis but also reflect on the challenges of conducting an IE – the conceptual unpicking and (re)thinking, and demarcating boundaries of investigation within an expansive dataset.,This paper illustrates IE's relevance for organisational ethnographers wishing to find a theoretically robust approach to taking sides, and suggests ways in which the IE approach might contribute to improving services, particularly healthcare. It provides an illustration of how taking a patient standpoint was accomplished in practice, and reflects on the challenges involved.","PeriodicalId":44924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Ethnography","volume":"10 1","pages":"21-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Ethnography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-12-2019-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to document the first author's experience of using institutional ethnography (IE) to “take sides” in healthcare research. The authors illustrate the points with data and key findings from a study of cardiovascular disease prevention.,The authors use Dorothy E Smith's IE approach, and particularly the theoretical tool of “standpoint”.,Starting with the development of the study, the authors trouble the researcher's positionality, highlighting tensions between institutional knowledge of “prevention” and other locations where knowledge about patients' health needs materialises. The authors outline how IE's theoretically and methodologically integrated toolkit became a framework for “taking sides” with patients. They describe how the researcher used IE to take a standpoint and map institutional relations from that standpoint. They argue that IE enabled an innovative analysis but also reflect on the challenges of conducting an IE – the conceptual unpicking and (re)thinking, and demarcating boundaries of investigation within an expansive dataset.,This paper illustrates IE's relevance for organisational ethnographers wishing to find a theoretically robust approach to taking sides, and suggests ways in which the IE approach might contribute to improving services, particularly healthcare. It provides an illustration of how taking a patient standpoint was accomplished in practice, and reflects on the challenges involved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机构民族志支持患者
本文的主要目的是记录第一作者使用机构人种学(IE)在医疗保健研究中“站队”的经验。作者用一项心血管疾病预防研究的数据和主要发现来说明这些观点。作者采用了Dorothy E Smith的IE方法,特别是“立场”这一理论工具。从研究的发展开始,作者们对研究人员的立场提出了质疑,强调了“预防”的机构知识与关于患者健康需求的其他知识之间的紧张关系。作者概述了IE在理论和方法上的综合工具包如何成为与患者“站队”的框架。他们描述了研究人员如何使用IE来采取立场并从该立场绘制制度关系。他们认为,IE实现了一种创新的分析,但也反映了实施IE的挑战——概念的拆解和(重新)思考,以及在一个庞大的数据集中划定调查的边界。本文说明了IE与希望找到一种理论上可靠的站队方法的组织民族志学家的相关性,并提出了IE方法可能有助于改善服务,特别是医疗保健的方法。它提供了如何采取病人的立场是在实践中完成的说明,并反映了所涉及的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
37.50%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Ethnography (JOE) has been launched to provide an opportunity for scholars, from all social and management science disciplines, to publish over two issues: -high-quality articles from original ethnographic research that contribute to the current and future development of qualitative intellectual knowledge and understanding of the nature of public and private sector work, organization and management -review articles examining the history and development of the contribution of ethnography to qualitative research in social, organization and management studies -articles examining the intellectual, pedagogical and practical use-value of ethnography in organization and management research, management education and management practice, or which extend, critique or challenge past and current theoretical and empirical knowledge claims within one or more of these areas of interest -articles on ethnographically informed research relating to the concepts of organization and organizing in any other wider social and cultural contexts.
期刊最新文献
Urban gardens as inclusive green living rooms? Gardening activities in Gothenburg, across and within social divides Organizational value streams as multiteam systems: an ethnographic case study Failing forward: the transformative power of writing in interdisciplinary ethnographic research Activists and volunteers organising amid constraints: the key role of time Glorifying and scapegoating narratives underlying activity-based workspaces in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1