Annotating Narrative Levels: Review of Guideline No. 8

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Cultural Analytics Pub Date : 2020-01-15 DOI:10.22148/16.064
T. McEnaney
{"title":"Annotating Narrative Levels: Review of Guideline No. 8","authors":"T. McEnaney","doi":"10.22148/16.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Let me tell you a story.” The proposed guidelines suggest that this phrase serve\nas the heuristic that readers supply at the beginning of any possible embedded\nnarrative to identify a shift in narrative frames or levels. (The difference between\n“frame” and “level,” although perhaps confusing in the history of narratology,\ndoes not seem like an important distinction at this stage of the project.) This\nsimple phrase, the author suggests, can replace a field of narrative theory they\nfeel would “simply confuse my student annotators.” However simple the phrase\nmight seem, however, it, in fact, conceals a number of key narratological issues:\nfocalization, temporal indices, diction / register, person, fictional paratexts, duration,\nand, no doubt, others. The question for the guidelines is whether one\ncan leapfrog the particularity of these issues if students use the above phrase to\nannotate texts with XML tags and produce operational scripts that identify the\nnested narratives. As it currently stands, students seem capable of learning the\nbasic idea of nested narratives and tagging changes in narrative frames, but there\nare no real results to confirm the project’s success, as the author reports they are\nnot yet able to confirm any inter-annotation agreement.","PeriodicalId":33005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22148/16.064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Let me tell you a story.” The proposed guidelines suggest that this phrase serve as the heuristic that readers supply at the beginning of any possible embedded narrative to identify a shift in narrative frames or levels. (The difference between “frame” and “level,” although perhaps confusing in the history of narratology, does not seem like an important distinction at this stage of the project.) This simple phrase, the author suggests, can replace a field of narrative theory they feel would “simply confuse my student annotators.” However simple the phrase might seem, however, it, in fact, conceals a number of key narratological issues: focalization, temporal indices, diction / register, person, fictional paratexts, duration, and, no doubt, others. The question for the guidelines is whether one can leapfrog the particularity of these issues if students use the above phrase to annotate texts with XML tags and produce operational scripts that identify the nested narratives. As it currently stands, students seem capable of learning the basic idea of nested narratives and tagging changes in narrative frames, but there are no real results to confirm the project’s success, as the author reports they are not yet able to confirm any inter-annotation agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注释性叙述层次:第8号准则审查
“让我给你讲一个故事。”拟议的指导方针建议,这个短语是读者在任何可能的嵌入叙事开始时提供的启发,以识别叙事框架或层次的转变。(“框架”和“层次”之间的区别,尽管在叙事学史上可能令人困惑,但在项目的现阶段似乎并不是一个重要的区别。)作者认为,这个简单的短语可以取代他们认为“只会让我的学生注释者感到困惑”的叙事理论领域,隐藏了许多关键的叙事问题:聚焦、时间索引、措辞/语域、人物、虚构的副文本、持续时间,毫无疑问,还有其他问题。指导方针的问题是,如果学生使用上述短语用XML标记说明文本,并生成识别测试叙述的操作脚本,是否可以超越这些问题的特殊性。目前,学生们似乎能够学习嵌套叙事的基本概念,并标记叙事框架中的变化,但没有真正的结果来证实该项目的成功,因为作者报告说,他们还无法证实任何相互注释的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cultural Analytics
Journal of Cultural Analytics Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Soviet View of the World. Exploring Long-Term Visual Patterns in “Novosti dnia” Newsreel Journal (1945-1992) A Digital Archaeology of Early Hispanic Film Culture: Film Magazines and the Male Fan Reader A Digital Trail of Rupture. The German Film Exile 1933-1945 in the Data of Günter Peter Straschek Approaching a National Film History through Data. Network Analysis in German Film History Digital Film Historiography: Challenges of/and Interdisciplinarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1