Nutrient release dynamics of an accelerated compost: A case study in an Alfisol and Ultisol

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Eurasian Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI:10.18393/EJSS.318795
O. AyanfeOluwa, O. Adeoluwa, V. Aduramigba-Modupe
{"title":"Nutrient release dynamics of an accelerated compost: A case study in an Alfisol and Ultisol","authors":"O. AyanfeOluwa, O. Adeoluwa, V. Aduramigba-Modupe","doi":"10.18393/EJSS.318795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acceleration of composting process could influence fertilizer-efficiency of the accelerated composts. This study therefore evaluated the nutrient release dynamics of different rates of a commercial accelerated compost ( OBD-plus ) in two soils described as Alfisol and Ultisol, under laboratory incubation study, in order to generate information for simulation under field conditions. Accelerated compost (AC) at the rates of 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 kg N ha -1 , mineral fertilizer (NPK 15-15-15) and conventional compost (CC) at 60 kg N ha -1 ,  were each mixed with  2 mm sieved soil (Alfisol and Ultisol) in cups, and arranged in a completely randomised design with three replications. Soils without amendment served as control. The treated soils were retrieved at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks of incubation (WOI), air dried and analysed for pH, organic C, N, P and K, and data analysed using regression test. The results revealed that the 60 kg N ha -1 AC improved the pH, OC, N. P, K by -2%, 11%, 3%, 141% and 4% respectively, across the WOI, on the average of performance in the two soils, comparable with mineral fertilizer (-5%, 8%, -1%, 76%, 4% respectively) and CC (11%, 40%, 3%, 773%, 10% respectively). The 60 kg N ha -1 AC significantly correlated (p<0.05) with time of incubation only with respect to P (0.934) and gave a similar nutrient release pattern compared with mineral fertilizer and CC, in terms of C, N, P and K in both soils. It therefore showed that the accelerated compost evaluated could mineralize in a way similar to conventional compost and mineral fertilizers, despite its shorter composting duration to maturity.","PeriodicalId":36945,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Soil Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"350-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18393/EJSS.318795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Acceleration of composting process could influence fertilizer-efficiency of the accelerated composts. This study therefore evaluated the nutrient release dynamics of different rates of a commercial accelerated compost ( OBD-plus ) in two soils described as Alfisol and Ultisol, under laboratory incubation study, in order to generate information for simulation under field conditions. Accelerated compost (AC) at the rates of 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 kg N ha -1 , mineral fertilizer (NPK 15-15-15) and conventional compost (CC) at 60 kg N ha -1 ,  were each mixed with  2 mm sieved soil (Alfisol and Ultisol) in cups, and arranged in a completely randomised design with three replications. Soils without amendment served as control. The treated soils were retrieved at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks of incubation (WOI), air dried and analysed for pH, organic C, N, P and K, and data analysed using regression test. The results revealed that the 60 kg N ha -1 AC improved the pH, OC, N. P, K by -2%, 11%, 3%, 141% and 4% respectively, across the WOI, on the average of performance in the two soils, comparable with mineral fertilizer (-5%, 8%, -1%, 76%, 4% respectively) and CC (11%, 40%, 3%, 773%, 10% respectively). The 60 kg N ha -1 AC significantly correlated (p<0.05) with time of incubation only with respect to P (0.934) and gave a similar nutrient release pattern compared with mineral fertilizer and CC, in terms of C, N, P and K in both soils. It therefore showed that the accelerated compost evaluated could mineralize in a way similar to conventional compost and mineral fertilizers, despite its shorter composting duration to maturity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加速堆肥的养分释放动力学:以Alfisol和Ultisol为例
堆肥过程的加速会影响加速堆肥的肥料效率。因此,本研究在实验室培养研究中评估了商业加速堆肥(OBD+)在Alfiol和Ultisol两种土壤中不同速率的养分释放动态,以产生信息,用于在田间条件下进行模拟。将30、60、90、120、150 kg N ha-1的加速堆肥(AC)、60 kg N ha-1的矿物肥料(NPK 15-15-15)和常规堆肥(CC)分别与2 mm筛过的土壤(Alfiol和Ultisol)在杯中混合,并以完全随机设计的方式进行三次重复。未经改良的土壤作为对照。在培养2、4、6、8、10和12周时取回处理过的土壤,风干并分析pH、有机C、N、P和K,并使用回归试验分析数据。结果表明,在两种土壤中,60 kg N ha-1 AC对整个WOI的pH、OC、N P、K的平均性能分别提高了-2%、11%、3%、141%和4%,与矿物肥料(分别为-5%、8%、-1%、76%、4%)和CC(分别为11%、40%、3%、773%、10%)相当。在两种土壤中,60kg N ha-1 AC仅与p(0.934)的培养时间显著相关(p<0.05),并且与矿物肥料和CC相比,在C、N、p和K方面具有相似的养分释放模式。因此,研究表明,所评估的加速堆肥可以以类似于传统堆肥和矿物肥料的方式矿化,尽管其堆肥至成熟的时间较短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Soil Science
Eurasian Journal of Soil Science Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of varied NPK fertilizer application rates and seed quantities on barley yield and soil nutrient availability in chestnut soil of Azerbaijan Comprehensive assessment and information database on saline and waterlogged soils in Kazakhstan: Insights from Remote Sensing Technology Prediction of some selected soil properties using the Hungarian Mid-infrared spectral library Assessment of ecological state of Rostov zoo soil Carbon sequestration potential of community forests: A comparative analysis of soil organic carbon stock in community managed forests of Far-Western Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1