Effects of parenting practices through deviant peers on nonviolent and violent antisocial behaviours in middle- and late-adolescence

IF 7.6 1区社会学 Q1 LAW European Journal of Psychology Applied To Legal Context Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.02.001

Olalla Cutrín, José Antonio Gómez-Fraguela, Lorena Maneiro, Jorge Sobral

{"title":"Effects of parenting practices through deviant peers on nonviolent and violent antisocial behaviours in middle- and late-adolescence","authors":"Olalla Cutrín, José Antonio Gómez-Fraguela, Lorena Maneiro, Jorge Sobral","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>The aim of the current study was to analyse in two age cohorts the presence of mediation effects of parenting practices (i.e., parental knowledge, parental support, parent-adolescent conflict) through deviant peers on youth antisocial behaviour (i.e., nonviolent antisocial behaviour, violent behaviour). The final sample was subdivided in a younger group (n = 377), aged 14 to 16 (M = 15.27, SD = 0.72), 45.9% males, and an older group (n = 206), aged 17 to 19 (M = 17.30, SD = 0.54), 48.5% males. The structural equation modelling results indicated significant mediation effects for both age cohorts. Family factors presented more influence for younger adolescents, whereas deviant peers showed more influence for older adolescents. The findings also indicated the reciprocal influence of selection and socialisation processes suggesting the need of early interventions for preventing the development of antisocial behaviour.</div>","PeriodicalId":46030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychology Applied To Legal Context","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.02.001","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychology Applied To Legal Context","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1889186116300518","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 40

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to analyse in two age cohorts the presence of mediation effects of parenting practices (i.e., parental knowledge, parental support, parent-adolescent conflict) through deviant peers on youth antisocial behaviour (i.e., nonviolent antisocial behaviour, violent behaviour). The final sample was subdivided in a younger group (n = 377), aged 14 to 16 (M = 15.27, SD = 0.72), 45.9% males, and an older group (n = 206), aged 17 to 19 (M = 17.30, SD = 0.54), 48.5% males. The structural equation modelling results indicated significant mediation effects for both age cohorts. Family factors presented more influence for younger adolescents, whereas deviant peers showed more influence for older adolescents. The findings also indicated the reciprocal influence of selection and socialisation processes suggesting the need of early interventions for preventing the development of antisocial behaviour.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

越轨同龄人的育儿实践对青少年中后期非暴力和暴力反社会行为的影响

本研究的目的是分析在两个年龄队列中，通过越轨同伴，父母教养行为(即父母知识、父母支持、父母-青少年冲突)对青少年反社会行为(即非暴力反社会行为、暴力行为)的中介效应。最终样本被细分为14至16岁的年轻组(n = 377) (M = 15.27, SD = 0.72)， 45.9%为男性;17至19岁的老年组(n = 206) (M = 17.30, SD = 0.54)， 48.5%为男性。结构方程模型结果表明，两个年龄组的中介效应显著。家庭因素对低龄青少年的影响更大，而越轨同伴对大龄青少年的影响更大。研究结果还表明，选择和社会化过程的相互影响表明，需要早期干预，以防止反社会行为的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Psychology Applied To Legal Context Multiple-

CiteScore

14.60

自引率

9.50%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, the official journal of the Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense [Spanish Society of Forensic Psychology] and the Asociación Iberoamericana de Justicia Terapéutica [Latin-American Association of Therapeutic Jurisprudence], publishes empirical articles and meta-analytic reviews of topics dealing with psychology and law (e.g., legal decision making, eyewitness). The journal is aimed at researchers, academics and professionals in Psychology, Law, Social Work, Forensic Sciences, Educators and, in general, people related with Social Sciences and the Law.