Microplastics removal technologies from aqueous environments: a systematic review

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z
Arman Arbabi, Mitra Gholami, Mahdi Farzadkia, Shirin Djalalinia
{"title":"Microplastics removal technologies from aqueous environments: a systematic review","authors":"Arman Arbabi,&nbsp;Mitra Gholami,&nbsp;Mahdi Farzadkia,&nbsp;Shirin Djalalinia","doi":"10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Pollution of the environment with all kinds of plastics has become a growing problem. The problem of microplastics is mainly due to the absorption of stable organic pollutants and metals into them, and as a result, their environmental toxicity increases. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the appropriate and efficient methods of removing microplastics from aqueous environments through a systematic review.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Present study designed according to PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers followed all process from search to final analysis, for the relevant studies using international databases of PubMed, Scopus and ISI/WOS (Web of Science), without time limit. The search strategy developed based on the main axis of “microplastics”, “aqueous environments” and “removal”. This research was carried out from 2017 until the March of 2022. All relevant observational, analytical studies, review articles, and a meta-analysis were included.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Through a comprehensive systematic search we found 2974 papers, after running the proses of refining, 80 eligible papers included to the study. According to the results of the review, the methods of removing microplastics from aquatic environments were divided to physical (12), chemical (18), physicochemical (27), biological (12) and integrated (11) methods. In different removal methods, the most dominant group of studied microplastics belonged to the four groups of polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene tetra phthalate (PET). Average removal efficiency of microplastics in different processes in each method was as: physical method (73.76%), chemical method (74.38%), physicochemical method (80.44%), biological method (75.23%) and integrated method (88.63%). The highest removal efficiency occurred in the processes based on the integrated method and the lowest efficiency occurred in the physical method. In total, 80% of the studies were conducted on a laboratory scale, 18.75% on a full scale and 1.25% on a pilot scale.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to the findings; different processes based on physical, chemical, physicochemical, biological and integrated methods are able to remove microplastics with high efficiency from aqueous environments and in order to reduce their hazardous effects on health and environment, these processes can be easily used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40201-023-00872-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Pollution of the environment with all kinds of plastics has become a growing problem. The problem of microplastics is mainly due to the absorption of stable organic pollutants and metals into them, and as a result, their environmental toxicity increases. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the appropriate and efficient methods of removing microplastics from aqueous environments through a systematic review.

Methods

Present study designed according to PRISMA guidelines. Two independent researchers followed all process from search to final analysis, for the relevant studies using international databases of PubMed, Scopus and ISI/WOS (Web of Science), without time limit. The search strategy developed based on the main axis of “microplastics”, “aqueous environments” and “removal”. This research was carried out from 2017 until the March of 2022. All relevant observational, analytical studies, review articles, and a meta-analysis were included.

Results

Through a comprehensive systematic search we found 2974 papers, after running the proses of refining, 80 eligible papers included to the study. According to the results of the review, the methods of removing microplastics from aquatic environments were divided to physical (12), chemical (18), physicochemical (27), biological (12) and integrated (11) methods. In different removal methods, the most dominant group of studied microplastics belonged to the four groups of polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene tetra phthalate (PET). Average removal efficiency of microplastics in different processes in each method was as: physical method (73.76%), chemical method (74.38%), physicochemical method (80.44%), biological method (75.23%) and integrated method (88.63%). The highest removal efficiency occurred in the processes based on the integrated method and the lowest efficiency occurred in the physical method. In total, 80% of the studies were conducted on a laboratory scale, 18.75% on a full scale and 1.25% on a pilot scale.

Conclusion

According to the findings; different processes based on physical, chemical, physicochemical, biological and integrated methods are able to remove microplastics with high efficiency from aqueous environments and in order to reduce their hazardous effects on health and environment, these processes can be easily used.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水环境中微塑料去除技术:系统综述
目的各种塑料对环境的污染已经成为一个日益严重的问题。微塑料的问题主要是由于其吸收了稳定的有机污染物和金属,因此其环境毒性增加。本研究的主要目的是通过系统综述,研究从水环境中去除微塑料的适当有效方法。方法本研究按PRISMA指导原则设计。两名独立研究人员使用PubMed、Scopus和ISI/WOS(Web of Science)的国际数据库对相关研究进行了从搜索到最终分析的所有过程,没有时间限制。搜索策略以“微塑料”、“水环境”和“去除”为主轴。这项研究从2017年一直进行到2022年3月。包括所有相关的观察、分析研究、综述文章和荟萃分析。结果通过全面系统的检索,共发现2974篇论文,经过提炼,80篇符合条件的论文纳入本研究。根据综述结果,从水生环境中去除微塑料的方法分为物理(12)、化学(18)、物理化学(27)、生物(12)和综合(11)方法。在不同的去除方法中,所研究的微塑料中最主要的一组属于聚乙烯(PE)、聚苯乙烯(PS)、聚丙烯(PP)和聚对苯二甲酸四酯(PET)四组。不同工艺对微塑料的平均去除率分别为:物理法(73.76%)、化学法(74.38%)、物理化学法(80.44%)、生物法(75.23%)和综合法(88.63%)。总的来说,80%的研究是在实验室规模上进行的,18.75%是在全规模上进行,1.25%是在中试规模上进行。结论根据研究结果;基于物理、化学、物理化学、生物和综合方法的不同工艺能够高效去除水环境中的微塑料,为了减少其对健康和环境的危害,这些工艺可以很容易地使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering is a peer-reviewed journal presenting timely research on all aspects of environmental health science, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: -Water pollution and treatment -Wastewater treatment and reuse -Air control -Soil remediation -Noise and radiation control -Environmental biotechnology and nanotechnology -Food safety and hygiene
期刊最新文献
Polystyrene nanoplastics: optimized removal using magnetic nano-adsorbent and toxicity assessment in zebrafish embryos The effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial community in anaerobic digestion process: A systematic review Production of biosurfactant by Bacillus megaterieum using agro-food wastes and its application in petroleum sludge oil recovery Investigations on the surface disinfection efficacy of far-UVC 222 nm germicidal irradiance device in a controlled environment and field test Determining the optimization of seawater concentrate discharge of coastal desalination plants into the marine environment, based on numerical modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1