Do not run out of toilet paper! The risk communication on perceived risk on consumer behavior during the crisis COVID-19

Virgin Dones, José A. Flecha-Ortiz, María Santos-Corrada, Evelyn Lopez
{"title":"Do not run out of toilet paper! The risk communication on perceived risk on consumer behavior during the crisis COVID-19","authors":"Virgin Dones, José A. Flecha-Ortiz, María Santos-Corrada, Evelyn Lopez","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-07-2021-0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAt the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing measures and diffuse communication by media led to consumers’ uncontrolled product purchases worldwide. This phenomenon was described as a psychological effect experienced by fictitious scarcity, anxiety and herd mentality exacerbated by the media. This exploratory study aims to analyze the impact of risk communication on the perceived risk from the psychological dimension of consumer behavior amid the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn exploratory study was conducted through an electronic survey one week after implementing social distancing measures in Puerto Rico. With a sample of 353 participants, the data analysis was carried out by PLS-SEM, partial least squares structural equations (PLS-MGA), multi group test (MGA) and hierarchical component models to answer the research hypotheses.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results revealed that risk communication activates the perceived psychological risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the way in which the consumer faces the psychological risk is explained by the perceptions of scarcity and the bandwagon effect.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is a pioneer in presenting relationships between risk communication and perceived risk in consumer behavior, a topic that needs to be addressed in the academic literature. The research makes significant contributions to the study of consumer behavior by empirically validating the three phases of the Conchar model – risk framing, risk assessment and risk evaluation – where risk communication offers an excellent delineation to understand the consumer’s behavior during a pandemic.\n","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-07-2021-0074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing measures and diffuse communication by media led to consumers’ uncontrolled product purchases worldwide. This phenomenon was described as a psychological effect experienced by fictitious scarcity, anxiety and herd mentality exacerbated by the media. This exploratory study aims to analyze the impact of risk communication on the perceived risk from the psychological dimension of consumer behavior amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory study was conducted through an electronic survey one week after implementing social distancing measures in Puerto Rico. With a sample of 353 participants, the data analysis was carried out by PLS-SEM, partial least squares structural equations (PLS-MGA), multi group test (MGA) and hierarchical component models to answer the research hypotheses. Findings The results revealed that risk communication activates the perceived psychological risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the way in which the consumer faces the psychological risk is explained by the perceptions of scarcity and the bandwagon effect. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is a pioneer in presenting relationships between risk communication and perceived risk in consumer behavior, a topic that needs to be addressed in the academic literature. The research makes significant contributions to the study of consumer behavior by empirically validating the three phases of the Conchar model – risk framing, risk assessment and risk evaluation – where risk communication offers an excellent delineation to understand the consumer’s behavior during a pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不要用完卫生纸!新冠肺炎危机期间消费者行为感知风险的风险沟通
目的在新冠肺炎大流行开始时,社交距离措施和媒体的传播导致消费者在全球范围内不受控制地购买产品。这种现象被描述为虚构的稀缺、焦虑和媒体加剧的从众心理所带来的心理影响。这项探索性研究旨在从新冠肺炎大流行期间消费者行为的心理维度分析风险沟通对感知风险的影响。设计/方法/方法在波多黎各实施社交距离措施一周后,通过电子调查进行了一项探索性研究。以353名参与者为样本,通过PLS-SEM、偏最小二乘结构方程(PLS-MGA)、多组检验(MGA)和分层成分模型进行数据分析,以回答研究假设。研究结果表明,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,风险沟通激活了感知的心理风险,消费者面临心理风险的方式可以通过对稀缺性和从众效应的感知来解释。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项研究是展示消费者行为中风险沟通和感知风险之间关系的先驱,这是一个需要在学术文献中解决的话题。该研究通过实证验证Conchar模型的三个阶段——风险框架、风险评估和风险评估——为消费者行为研究做出了重大贡献,在这三个阶段,风险沟通为理解消费者在疫情期间的行为提供了极好的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Progress and trends in healthcare marketing strategy (2018–2022): A descriptive and bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science (WOS) dataset Modelling organ donation information adoption among Malaysian youth using the information adoption model (IAM) The impact of word-of-mouth (WOM) on attitudes, behavioural intentions, and actual usage of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) among early and late adopters Does the pharmaceutical industry’s growth relate to Bangladesh’s macroeconomic stability? Food as an ingredient of well-being: from food and well-being to food well-being (FWB): a comparative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1