Verbal and Nonverbal Memory in Neurodegenerative and Stroke Aphasia: Evidence From the Turkish Version of the Three Words Three Shapes Test

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1097/WNN.0000000000000294
M. Seckin, Begüm Özbek, Ilayda Demir, E. Kurt, Ulaş Ay, D. Yildirim, N. Yesilot, O. Çoban, Öget Öktem, H. Gürvit
{"title":"Verbal and Nonverbal Memory in Neurodegenerative and Stroke Aphasia: Evidence From the Turkish Version of the Three Words Three Shapes Test","authors":"M. Seckin, Begüm Özbek, Ilayda Demir, E. Kurt, Ulaş Ay, D. Yildirim, N. Yesilot, O. Çoban, Öget Öktem, H. Gürvit","doi":"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although language impairment is the most salient feature of cognitive impairment in both primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and stroke aphasia (SA), memory can also be impaired in both patient populations. Objective: To identify distinctive features of verbal and nonverbal memory processing in individuals with PPA and those with SA. Method: We gave individuals with PPA (n = 14), those with SA (n = 8), and healthy controls (HC; n = 13) a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and the Turkish version of the Three Words Three Shapes Test (3W3S–Turkish). The 3W3S–Turkish Test includes five subtests: Copy, Incidental Recall, Acquisition, Delayed Recall, and Recognition. High-resolution brain scans were performed in a subset of individuals with PPA and those with SA. Lesion distribution was limited to the dorsal language areas in the SA group, whereas peak atrophy areas in the PPA group extended beyond the language network, including the medial temporal lobe, precuneus, and posterior/medial portions of the cingulate cortex. Results: Both the PPA and SA groups showed impairment in incidental recall, and the PPA group showed additional impairment in delayed recall. Greater impairment for verbal stimuli suggestive of material-specific memory impairment was evident in the PPA group’s scores on the Incidental Recall and Delayed Recall subtests. Both aphasia groups retained the acquired information regardless of material type. Conclusion: Although both aphasia groups shared similarities in the involvement of the dorsal prefrontal working memory/attention network, the PPA group showed greater impairment in delayed recall compared with the SA group.","PeriodicalId":50671,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although language impairment is the most salient feature of cognitive impairment in both primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and stroke aphasia (SA), memory can also be impaired in both patient populations. Objective: To identify distinctive features of verbal and nonverbal memory processing in individuals with PPA and those with SA. Method: We gave individuals with PPA (n = 14), those with SA (n = 8), and healthy controls (HC; n = 13) a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and the Turkish version of the Three Words Three Shapes Test (3W3S–Turkish). The 3W3S–Turkish Test includes five subtests: Copy, Incidental Recall, Acquisition, Delayed Recall, and Recognition. High-resolution brain scans were performed in a subset of individuals with PPA and those with SA. Lesion distribution was limited to the dorsal language areas in the SA group, whereas peak atrophy areas in the PPA group extended beyond the language network, including the medial temporal lobe, precuneus, and posterior/medial portions of the cingulate cortex. Results: Both the PPA and SA groups showed impairment in incidental recall, and the PPA group showed additional impairment in delayed recall. Greater impairment for verbal stimuli suggestive of material-specific memory impairment was evident in the PPA group’s scores on the Incidental Recall and Delayed Recall subtests. Both aphasia groups retained the acquired information regardless of material type. Conclusion: Although both aphasia groups shared similarities in the involvement of the dorsal prefrontal working memory/attention network, the PPA group showed greater impairment in delayed recall compared with the SA group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经退行性和中风失语症的言语和非言语记忆:来自土耳其语三词三形测验的证据
背景:虽然语言障碍是原发性进行性失语症(PPA)和卒中性失语症(SA)中认知障碍的最显著特征,但在这两种患者群体中,记忆也可能受损。目的:探讨PPA患者和SA患者言语和非言语记忆加工的特点。方法:选取PPA患者(n = 14)、SA患者(n = 8)和健康对照(HC;n = 13)综合神经心理测试组和土耳其版的三字三形测试(3w3s -土耳其语)。3w3s -土耳其测试包括五个子测试:复制、附带回忆、习得、延迟回忆和识别。对PPA患者和SA患者进行了高分辨率脑部扫描。SA组的病变分布仅限于背侧语言区,而PPA组的峰值萎缩区域延伸到语言网络之外,包括内侧颞叶、楔前叶和扣带皮层的后/内侧部分。结果:PPA组和SA组在偶然回忆中均表现出障碍,PPA组在延迟回忆中表现出额外的障碍。PPA组在附带回忆和延迟回忆子测试中的得分明显显示,言语刺激对物质特异性记忆障碍的损害更大。两组失语症患者均保留了习得的信息,与材料类型无关。结论:尽管两组失语症患者在背侧前额叶工作记忆/注意网络的参与上有相似之处,但PPA组在延迟回忆上的损害大于SA组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology (CBN) is a forum for advances in the neurologic understanding and possible treatment of human disorders that affect thinking, learning, memory, communication, and behavior. As an incubator for innovations in these fields, CBN helps transform theory into practice. The journal serves clinical research, patient care, education, and professional advancement. The journal welcomes contributions from neurology, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and other relevant fields. The editors particularly encourage review articles (including reviews of clinical practice), experimental and observational case reports, instructional articles for interested students and professionals in other fields, and innovative articles that do not fit neatly into any category. Also welcome are therapeutic trials and other experimental and observational studies, brief reports, first-person accounts of neurologic experiences, position papers, hypotheses, opinion papers, commentaries, historical perspectives, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Free-listing and Semantic Knowledge: A Tool for Detecting Alzheimer Disease? The Banana Lady and Other Stories of Curious Behavior and Speech. Threatening an Illusory Limb: An Event-related Potential Study of the Rubber Hand Illusion. Cortical Thickness Correlates of Go/No-go and Motor Sequencing in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Suspected Alzheimer Disease Dementia. The Cotard Delusion in a Patient With Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The Challenges of Autoimmune Psychosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1