Defining land rights in Dutch Sri Lanka

IF 0.2 Q3 Social Sciences Portuguese Journal of Social Science Pub Date : 2017-11-17 DOI:10.1386/PJSS.16.2.143_1
Nadeera Rupesinghe
{"title":"Defining land rights in Dutch Sri Lanka","authors":"Nadeera Rupesinghe","doi":"10.1386/PJSS.16.2.143_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dutch East India Company (Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie [VOC]) set up a judicial forum of European and native officials called the Landraad in parts of early modern Sri Lanka. Its primary tasks were to hear certain civil cases and maintain the thombo (land register). The VOC wished to define who could do what in which piece of land and what it could extract in return. This article is a study of land rights in southern Sri Lanka, providing quantitative and qualitative evidence on the types of possession recognized by the VOC. Officials used local terms relating to land tenure in the thombo, the Landraad and other discussions. The thombo and the Landraad were in effect the legal mechanisms by which the conversion of land, whether collectively or individually held, into alienable title was sought to be consolidated. Despite the complexities of the local land tenure system, the VOC attempted to enforce rules and regulations that would create a neat, circumscribed system that followed specific legal procedures and written forms. This was not always achieved in practice, indicating the important yet discreet role played by peasants in defining land rights.","PeriodicalId":51963,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Social Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"143-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/PJSS.16.2.143_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Dutch East India Company (Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie [VOC]) set up a judicial forum of European and native officials called the Landraad in parts of early modern Sri Lanka. Its primary tasks were to hear certain civil cases and maintain the thombo (land register). The VOC wished to define who could do what in which piece of land and what it could extract in return. This article is a study of land rights in southern Sri Lanka, providing quantitative and qualitative evidence on the types of possession recognized by the VOC. Officials used local terms relating to land tenure in the thombo, the Landraad and other discussions. The thombo and the Landraad were in effect the legal mechanisms by which the conversion of land, whether collectively or individually held, into alienable title was sought to be consolidated. Despite the complexities of the local land tenure system, the VOC attempted to enforce rules and regulations that would create a neat, circumscribed system that followed specific legal procedures and written forms. This was not always achieved in practice, indicating the important yet discreet role played by peasants in defining land rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
界定荷属斯里兰卡的土地权利
荷兰东印度公司(Verenigde Oostdische Compagnie[VOC])在现代早期斯里兰卡的部分地区建立了一个由欧洲和当地官员组成的司法论坛,名为Landraad。它的主要任务是审理某些民事案件并维护thombo(土地登记册)。VOC希望定义谁可以在哪片土地上做什么,以及可以提取什么作为回报。本文是对斯里兰卡南部土地权利的研究,为VOC承认的占有类型提供了定量和定性的证据。官员们在thombo、Landraad和其他讨论中使用了与土地保有权有关的当地术语。thombo和Landraad实际上是寻求将土地(无论是集体持有还是单独持有)转换为可转让所有权的法律机制。尽管当地土地保有制度很复杂,但VOC试图执行规则和条例,以创建一个遵循特定法律程序和书面形式的整洁、有限制的制度。这在实践中并不总是实现的,这表明农民在界定土地权利方面发挥着重要而谨慎的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Portuguese Journal of Social Science is a peer-reviewed cross-disciplinary journal focusing on research about Portuguese society by scholars of any nationality. However, the journal takes a broad view and accepts articles that are not exclusively devoted to the Portuguese case. We particularly welcome comparative studies. While the journal concentrates on research articles it operates a flexible policy in respect of other types of submission, including book reviews.
期刊最新文献
João Ferreira de Ameida (12 June 1941 – 16 June 2022) Ageing with a twist: Intimacy and care amongst LGB older adults in Portugal Gender (trans)formations in Europe and beyond: Trans lives and politics from a transnational perspective LGBTQI+ in democratic Portugal: An overview essay Somewhere under the rainbow: LGBTQ youth and school climate in Portugal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1