Comfort Level of Current Physical Therapist Students in Addressing Sexual Issues With Patients

Mary Dockter, Emma Ulmer, Cailey Wulf, Morgan Gunderson, Jordan Bornhorst, Alissa Joneson, Karen Abraham, Rebecca Reisch
{"title":"Comfort Level of Current Physical Therapist Students in Addressing Sexual Issues With Patients","authors":"Mary Dockter, Emma Ulmer, Cailey Wulf, Morgan Gunderson, Jordan Bornhorst, Alissa Joneson, Karen Abraham, Rebecca Reisch","doi":"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: Scarce evidence has been found on factors that determine physical therapist (PT) students' comfort level in addressing sexual issues with patients. Determining influential factors and barriers may help educators adjust their curriculum to better prepare students. Objectives: To identify the comfort level of PT students in addressing sexual issues with patients, demographic factors that impact the students' comfort level, and barriers to PT students addressing sexual issues with patients. Study Design: A cross-sectional survey design. Methods: A survey was sent to current PT students enrolled at 3 Doctorate of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs. The survey consisted of demographic and scenario questions related to the students' comfort level in addressing sexual issues. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed to compare the differences in the comfort levels for male and female students. A χ2 analysis was performed to determine which demographic factors were significantly (P < .05) associated with the respondent's comfort level. Results: First-, second-, and third-year students (N = 106) completed the survey and represented programs from diverse geographic locations and religious affiliations. Less than half (41.5%) agreed that they had the necessary skills to address sexual issues, and only 23.58% of respondents were likely to initiate discussion. While students were most comfortable addressing issues with their own gender, collectively there was increased comfort level with conversations with females. Main barriers included lack of experience and knowledge, fear of patient misunderstanding, and patient comfort level. Conclusion: PT students lack comfort in addressing sexual issues due to multiple barriers. Demographic information, including geological location and religious background, was not significantly associated with comfort level (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which summarizes this study available at: http://links.lww.com/JWHPT/A44).","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":"45 1","pages":"97 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: Scarce evidence has been found on factors that determine physical therapist (PT) students' comfort level in addressing sexual issues with patients. Determining influential factors and barriers may help educators adjust their curriculum to better prepare students. Objectives: To identify the comfort level of PT students in addressing sexual issues with patients, demographic factors that impact the students' comfort level, and barriers to PT students addressing sexual issues with patients. Study Design: A cross-sectional survey design. Methods: A survey was sent to current PT students enrolled at 3 Doctorate of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs. The survey consisted of demographic and scenario questions related to the students' comfort level in addressing sexual issues. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed to compare the differences in the comfort levels for male and female students. A χ2 analysis was performed to determine which demographic factors were significantly (P < .05) associated with the respondent's comfort level. Results: First-, second-, and third-year students (N = 106) completed the survey and represented programs from diverse geographic locations and religious affiliations. Less than half (41.5%) agreed that they had the necessary skills to address sexual issues, and only 23.58% of respondents were likely to initiate discussion. While students were most comfortable addressing issues with their own gender, collectively there was increased comfort level with conversations with females. Main barriers included lack of experience and knowledge, fear of patient misunderstanding, and patient comfort level. Conclusion: PT students lack comfort in addressing sexual issues due to multiple barriers. Demographic information, including geological location and religious background, was not significantly associated with comfort level (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which summarizes this study available at: http://links.lww.com/JWHPT/A44).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前物理治疗师学生在与患者解决性问题时的舒适度
补充数字内容可在文本中获得。背景:关于决定物理治疗师(PT)学生在与患者解决性问题时的舒适程度的因素的证据很少。确定影响因素和障碍可能有助于教育工作者调整他们的课程,使学生更好地做好准备。目的:了解PT学生与患者处理性问题时的舒适程度,影响学生舒适度的人口统计学因素,以及PT学生与患者处理性问题的障碍。研究设计:横断面调查设计。方法:对3个物理治疗专业的在读博士生进行问卷调查。调查包括人口统计和情景问题,这些问题与学生在处理性问题时的舒适程度有关。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较男女学生在舒适程度上的差异。采用χ2分析确定哪些人口统计学因素与被调查者的舒适度显著相关(P < 0.05)。结果:一年级、二年级和三年级的学生(N = 106)完成了调查,代表了来自不同地理位置和宗教信仰的项目。不到一半(41.5%)的受访者认为他们有处理性问题的必要技能,只有23.58%的受访者愿意主动讨论。虽然学生们在讨论与自己性别有关的问题时感到最自在,但总的来说,与女性交谈的舒适度有所提高。主要障碍包括缺乏经验和知识、害怕患者误解和患者舒适度。结论:由于多重障碍,PT学生在处理性问题时缺乏舒适感。包括地理位置和宗教背景在内的人口统计信息与舒适度没有显著关联(见视频,补充数字内容1,总结了这项研究,可在:http://links.lww.com/JWHPT/A44)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Executive Summary: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rehabilitation Interventions for Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency, and/or Urinary Frequency in Adult Women Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rehabilitation Interventions for Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency, and/or Urinary Frequency in Adult Women Running Gait Retraining in the Management of a Multiparous Runner With Chronic Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Case Study New Name, New Format! APTA 2023 Combined Sections Meeting Posters and Platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1