The Reality of Making a Medication Administration Error in Nursing Practice: Nurses Share Their Lived Experiences

S. Lall
{"title":"The Reality of Making a Medication Administration Error in Nursing Practice: Nurses Share Their Lived Experiences","authors":"S. Lall","doi":"10.15344/2394-4978/2018/286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of clinical nursing practice, chaotic and technical nature of the workplace environment coupled with the multiple and varied roles of nurses, leads to cognitive overload that may overwhelm nurses, which may result in medication errors. All medication errors are considered serious events, but some may consequently be harmful to patients and have a lasting effect on the nurses involved in making the error. This study examined what it was like to make a medication error for registered nurses. A descriptive phenomenological study rooted in the philosophical tradition of Husserl [1] was conducted on eight registered nurses via two in-depth face to face interviews. The data generated from a total of sixteen interviews and field notes were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method. Five theme categories emerged: Immediate Impact: Psychological and Physical Reactions; Multiple Causes within Chaos: Cognitive Dimensions; Embedded Challenges: Healthcare Setting; Organizational Culture: Within the Place/Within the Person; Dynamics of Reflection: Looking Forward. The lived experience of making a medication administration error led nurses to the realization that a profound occurrence had taken place. As a result, these nurses experienced upheavals that were of a physical and emotional nature, which threatened their professional status and generated a sense of low self-esteem that considerably decreased their selfconfidence. An overwhelming amount of workload, a stressful work environment and mistreatment by peers were predominantly noted as the factors that led to these errors. Nurses in this study offered suggestions to improve the system but felt their concerns were often undervalued. Implications for nursing education and nursing practice, to significantly improve teaching strategies of medication administration process leading to improved patient outcomes, were suggested.","PeriodicalId":91514,"journal":{"name":"International journal of nursing & clinical practices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of nursing & clinical practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2018/286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The complexity of clinical nursing practice, chaotic and technical nature of the workplace environment coupled with the multiple and varied roles of nurses, leads to cognitive overload that may overwhelm nurses, which may result in medication errors. All medication errors are considered serious events, but some may consequently be harmful to patients and have a lasting effect on the nurses involved in making the error. This study examined what it was like to make a medication error for registered nurses. A descriptive phenomenological study rooted in the philosophical tradition of Husserl [1] was conducted on eight registered nurses via two in-depth face to face interviews. The data generated from a total of sixteen interviews and field notes were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method. Five theme categories emerged: Immediate Impact: Psychological and Physical Reactions; Multiple Causes within Chaos: Cognitive Dimensions; Embedded Challenges: Healthcare Setting; Organizational Culture: Within the Place/Within the Person; Dynamics of Reflection: Looking Forward. The lived experience of making a medication administration error led nurses to the realization that a profound occurrence had taken place. As a result, these nurses experienced upheavals that were of a physical and emotional nature, which threatened their professional status and generated a sense of low self-esteem that considerably decreased their selfconfidence. An overwhelming amount of workload, a stressful work environment and mistreatment by peers were predominantly noted as the factors that led to these errors. Nurses in this study offered suggestions to improve the system but felt their concerns were often undervalued. Implications for nursing education and nursing practice, to significantly improve teaching strategies of medication administration process leading to improved patient outcomes, were suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理实践中用药失误的现实:护士分享生活经验
临床护理实践的复杂性、工作环境的混乱性和技术性,加上护士角色的多样性和多样性,导致认知过载,可能会压垮护士,从而导致用药错误。所有药物错误都被视为严重事件,但有些错误可能会对患者有害,并对犯错误的护士产生持久影响。这项研究调查了注册护士出现用药错误的感觉。一项植根于胡塞尔哲学传统的描述性现象学研究[1]通过两次深入的面对面访谈对八名注册护士进行了研究。使用Colaizzi的七步法对总共16次访谈和现场笔记产生的数据进行了分析。出现了五个主题类别:直接影响:心理和身体反应;混沌的多重原因:认知维度;嵌入式挑战:医疗环境;组织文化:在场所内/在人内;反思的动力:向前看。犯下用药错误的亲身经历让护士们意识到发生了一件深刻的事情。因此,这些护士经历了身体和情感上的动荡,这威胁到了他们的职业地位,并产生了自卑感,大大降低了他们的自信心。大量的工作量、紧张的工作环境和同伴的虐待主要被认为是导致这些错误的因素。在这项研究中,护士们提出了改进该系统的建议,但他们觉得自己的担忧往往被低估了。提出了对护理教育和护理实践的启示,以显著改进用药过程的教学策略,从而改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation and Analysis of the Current Situation of VAE Preventive Measures in ICU in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration of China A Dichotomous Relationship of Intergenerational Caregiving within Elderly Care: Disruption/Disharmony and Connection/ Harmony Across the Generations Comparative Study on the Intercultural Sensitivity of Japanese and Korean Nursing Students Evaluation of Effectiveness of Comprehensive Oral Hygiene Management in Mechanical Ventilation Patients in Chinese Intensive Care Unit The View of Life and Death and Decision Support at the End of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1