Protective benefit of minimally invasive liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to transplant

S. Khouzam, D. Pagano, M. Barbara, V. Di Marco, G. Pietrosi, M. Maringhini, M. Canzonieri, S. Calamia, S. Gruttadauria
{"title":"Protective benefit of minimally invasive liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to transplant","authors":"S. Khouzam, D. Pagano, M. Barbara, V. Di Marco, G. Pietrosi, M. Maringhini, M. Canzonieri, S. Calamia, S. Gruttadauria","doi":"10.20517/2394-5079.2021.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of this study is to assess the benefit of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) given recurrence and future need for liver transplantation (LT). Methods: Data on liver resections were gathered from the Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT) from 2003-2021. A retrospective analysis of 1408 consecutive adult patients who had a liver resection was performed with categorization based on the underlying disease process. A sub-analysis studied the 291 patients who had an LLR with an intention to transplant approach after LLR. Results: From 2012 to 2020, ISMETT’s mean annual LLR rate was 45%. Data suggests that a laparoscopic approach to iterative surgical treatment for HCC has demonstrated protective benefits. Compared to open surgery or LT, LLR is protective against the risk of de-listing, post-transplant patient death, tumor recurrence, adhesions, and bleeding in a cirrhotic patient. Kaplan Meier’s analysis showed no difference between post-LT survival curves for those with prior open abdominal surgery or LLR (P = 0.658). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery has important protective advantages over laparotomy surgery for the surgical treatment of HCC, particularly since treatment is not always curative. LLR can be considered a bridge therapy for transplantation, ensuring less crowding of waiting lists, a desirable condition in areas of donor storage.","PeriodicalId":12959,"journal":{"name":"Hepatoma Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2021.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to assess the benefit of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) given recurrence and future need for liver transplantation (LT). Methods: Data on liver resections were gathered from the Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT) from 2003-2021. A retrospective analysis of 1408 consecutive adult patients who had a liver resection was performed with categorization based on the underlying disease process. A sub-analysis studied the 291 patients who had an LLR with an intention to transplant approach after LLR. Results: From 2012 to 2020, ISMETT’s mean annual LLR rate was 45%. Data suggests that a laparoscopic approach to iterative surgical treatment for HCC has demonstrated protective benefits. Compared to open surgery or LT, LLR is protective against the risk of de-listing, post-transplant patient death, tumor recurrence, adhesions, and bleeding in a cirrhotic patient. Kaplan Meier’s analysis showed no difference between post-LT survival curves for those with prior open abdominal surgery or LLR (P = 0.658). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery has important protective advantages over laparotomy surgery for the surgical treatment of HCC, particularly since treatment is not always curative. LLR can be considered a bridge therapy for transplantation, ensuring less crowding of waiting lists, a desirable condition in areas of donor storage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝细胞癌移植前微创肝手术的保护作用
目的:本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)对肝细胞癌(HCC)复发和未来需要肝移植(LT)的益处。方法:从2003年至2021年,收集来自意大利科学院(instituto di Ricovero e Cura a caratere scientificere)和地中海科学院(instituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti - Terapie and alta specialzazione)的肝脏切除术数据。回顾性分析了1408例连续行肝切除术的成年患者,并根据潜在疾病进程进行了分类。一项亚分析研究了291例LLR术后有意移植入路的患者。结果:2012 - 2020年,ISMETT的年平均LLR率为45%。数据显示,腹腔镜下反复手术治疗HCC具有保护作用。与开放手术或肝移植相比,LLR对肝硬化患者的摘除术、移植后患者死亡、肿瘤复发、粘连和出血具有保护作用。Kaplan Meier的分析显示,术前腹部开腹手术或LLR患者术后生存曲线无差异(P = 0.658)。结论:对于肝细胞癌的手术治疗,腹腔镜手术比剖腹手术具有重要的保护优势,特别是在治疗并不总是治愈的情况下。LLR可以被认为是移植的桥梁疗法,确保等待名单不那么拥挤,这是供体储存区域的理想条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary assessment of tumor response after internal and external radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma Interpretation of the updates of the chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer (CNLC-2024 Edition) Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy: a review with technical notes Measures for response assessment in HCC treatment Impact of diet and gut microbiota changes in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1