Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2023-12-29 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13437.1
Athanasia Kouroupa, Leila Hamza, Aisha Rafiq, Angela Hassiotis, Penny Rapaport, Andrew Jahoda, Laurence Taggart, Liz Steed, Sally-Ann Cooper, Craig Melville, Louise Marston, Rachel Royston, Afia Ali
{"title":"Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities.","authors":"Athanasia Kouroupa, Leila Hamza, Aisha Rafiq, Angela Hassiotis, Penny Rapaport, Andrew Jahoda, Laurence Taggart, Liz Steed, Sally-Ann Cooper, Craig Melville, Louise Marston, Rachel Royston, Afia Ali","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13437.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Success of psychosocial interventions in reducing aggressive challenging behaviour is likely to be related not only to mechanistic aspects but also to therapeutic and system factors. The study aims to examine the facilitators and barriers that influence whether psychosocial interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities lead to positive change. We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with adults with intellectual disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour, family/paid carers, and professionals engaged in or delivering a psychosocial intervention across the UK. Data were analysed thematically using a framework approach. Stakeholders considered therapeutic and supportive relationships and personalised care as facilitating factors in addressing aggressive challenging behaviour. The operational structure of community intellectual disability services and conflicting expectations of professionals and carers were the main contextual barriers that impeded the implementation of psychosocial interventions in adults with intellectual disabilities. Findings highlight the valued components that maximise positive change in adults with intellectual disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour. Several operational adjustments including referral criteria, roles of professionals and workforce issues need to be addressed in services to maximise the implementation of psychosocial interventions leading to reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":" ","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593323/pdf/nihropenres-3-14575.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13437.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Success of psychosocial interventions in reducing aggressive challenging behaviour is likely to be related not only to mechanistic aspects but also to therapeutic and system factors. The study aims to examine the facilitators and barriers that influence whether psychosocial interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities lead to positive change. We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with adults with intellectual disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour, family/paid carers, and professionals engaged in or delivering a psychosocial intervention across the UK. Data were analysed thematically using a framework approach. Stakeholders considered therapeutic and supportive relationships and personalised care as facilitating factors in addressing aggressive challenging behaviour. The operational structure of community intellectual disability services and conflicting expectations of professionals and carers were the main contextual barriers that impeded the implementation of psychosocial interventions in adults with intellectual disabilities. Findings highlight the valued components that maximise positive change in adults with intellectual disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour. Several operational adjustments including referral criteria, roles of professionals and workforce issues need to be addressed in services to maximise the implementation of psychosocial interventions leading to reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对心理社会干预措施的障碍和促进因素的看法,以解决智力残疾成年人攻击性挑战行为减少的问题
背景:心理社会干预在减少攻击性挑战行为方面的成功可能不仅与机制方面有关,还与治疗和系统因素有关。这项研究旨在检验影响智障成年人攻击性挑战行为的心理社会干预是否会带来积极变化的因素和障碍。方法:我们对英国各地有智力残疾和攻击性挑战行为的成年人、家庭/有偿护理人员以及从事或提供心理社会干预的专业人员进行了42次半结构化访谈。使用框架方法对数据进行主题分析。结果:利益相关者认为治疗和支持关系以及个性化护理是心理社会干预的促进因素,以解决攻击性挑战行为。社区智障服务的运作结构以及专业人员和护理人员相互矛盾的期望是阻碍实施心理社会干预措施以解决智障成年人攻击性挑战行为的主要背景障碍。结论:研究结果强调了在表现出攻击性挑战性行为的智障成年人中最大限度地实现积极变化的重要组成部分。在服务中需要解决一些操作调整,包括转诊标准、专业人员的角色和劳动力问题,以最大限度地实施心理社会干预措施,减少智障成年人的攻击性挑战行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review. Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection. Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol. Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study. The UK Breast Cancer in Pregnancy (UKBCiP) Study. Incidence, diagnosis, management and short-term outcomes of breast cancer first diagnosed during pregnancy in the United Kingdom: A population-based descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1