Level of Comfort in Evaluating Older Patients Amongst Medical Students and Emergency Medicine Residents

L. Berrin, Phraewa Thatphet, A. Chary, Surriya Ahmad, D. Melady, Shan W Liu
{"title":"Level of Comfort in Evaluating Older Patients Amongst Medical Students and Emergency Medicine Residents","authors":"L. Berrin, Phraewa Thatphet, A. Chary, Surriya Ahmad, D. Melady, Shan W Liu","doi":"10.17294/2694-4715.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"dissemination methods of the RAMS listserv and Twitter still do not include all EM residents and interested medical students, so some part of the population was likely missed. In addition, this survey was announced at the AGEM annual meeting, as part of SAEM, so there is likely some selectivity bias in recruiting trainees who have already expressed an interest in GEM. This may explain the number of trainees who responded positively to questions regarding interest and importance of GEM and a career in GEM, the lower numbers for those who said that they are not interested in GEM. This study also focused only on emergency medicine residents and medical students who self-identified as interested in EM, so the results are less generalizable to the general population of medical trainees not interested in EM. This survey examined self-reported comfort with core geriatric competencies, rather than objective knowledge and skills, which is a direction for future research. This study is an initial step toward exploring the level of comfort EM residents and medical students interested in EM have in evaluating and managing older patients, as measured with the geriatric core competencies, as well as exploring trainees’ exposure to GEM. More work is needed in this area to understand trainee comfort with the geriatric core competencies and working with this complex population. Greater geriatrics exposure in preclinical and clinical training can increase competency and interest, which may be best accomplished earlier in medical training. EM trainees are aware of the need for and importance of additional GEM education, and educators should find ways to teach trainees creatively and engagingly about caring for older patients. Increasing GEM exposure and training will be important in creating a future EM physician workforce that is comfortable in the required competencies for caring for this complex and important patient population.","PeriodicalId":73757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2694-4715.1024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

dissemination methods of the RAMS listserv and Twitter still do not include all EM residents and interested medical students, so some part of the population was likely missed. In addition, this survey was announced at the AGEM annual meeting, as part of SAEM, so there is likely some selectivity bias in recruiting trainees who have already expressed an interest in GEM. This may explain the number of trainees who responded positively to questions regarding interest and importance of GEM and a career in GEM, the lower numbers for those who said that they are not interested in GEM. This study also focused only on emergency medicine residents and medical students who self-identified as interested in EM, so the results are less generalizable to the general population of medical trainees not interested in EM. This survey examined self-reported comfort with core geriatric competencies, rather than objective knowledge and skills, which is a direction for future research. This study is an initial step toward exploring the level of comfort EM residents and medical students interested in EM have in evaluating and managing older patients, as measured with the geriatric core competencies, as well as exploring trainees’ exposure to GEM. More work is needed in this area to understand trainee comfort with the geriatric core competencies and working with this complex population. Greater geriatrics exposure in preclinical and clinical training can increase competency and interest, which may be best accomplished earlier in medical training. EM trainees are aware of the need for and importance of additional GEM education, and educators should find ways to teach trainees creatively and engagingly about caring for older patients. Increasing GEM exposure and training will be important in creating a future EM physician workforce that is comfortable in the required competencies for caring for this complex and important patient population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生和急诊住院医师评估老年患者的舒适度
RAMS listserv和Twitter的传播方法仍然没有包括所有的EM居民和感兴趣的医学生,所以可能遗漏了部分人群。此外,这项调查是在AGEM年会上宣布的,作为SAEM的一部分,因此在招聘已经对GEM表示兴趣的受训人员时可能存在一些选择性偏见。这可能解释了对创业板的兴趣和重要性以及创业板职业生涯的问题做出积极回答的学员人数,而对创业板不感兴趣的学员人数较少。这项研究也只关注急诊住院医师和自称对EM感兴趣的医学生,因此结果不太适用于对EM不感兴趣的普通医学实习生。这项调查考察了自我报告的老年核心能力的舒适度,而不是客观的知识和技能,这是未来研究的方向。这项研究是探索少数族裔居民和对少数族裔感兴趣的医学生在评估和管理老年患者方面的舒适程度的第一步,以老年医学核心能力为衡量标准,并探索受训人员接触GEM的情况。在这一领域还需要做更多的工作,以了解受训者对老年医学核心能力的满意度,并与这一复杂人群合作。在临床前和临床培训中更多地接触老年病可以提高能力和兴趣,这可能最好在医疗培训早期完成。EM受训人员意识到额外GEM教育的必要性和重要性,教育工作者应该找到方法,创造性地、引人入胜地向受训人员传授照顾老年患者的知识。增加GEM的接触和培训对于培养未来的EM医生队伍非常重要,他们能够胜任照顾这一复杂而重要的患者群体所需的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frailty Explains Variation in Emergency Department Use for Older Veterans During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Geriatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Journal Club – Community Paramedicine Older Adult with Transplanted Kidney Failure from Ureteral Obstruction Within a Hernia Bilateral corneal perforations due to elder neglect: a case report Emergency Care of an Older Adult with Complex Care Needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1