Diagnosing the Blinding Effects of Trumpism: Rejoinder to Pluta

IF 0.4 3区社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Critical Review Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.1080/08913811.2019.1690220

Charles U. Zug

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Anne C. Pluta’s reply to my critique perpetuates the errors that undermined the article I criticized. Pluta dismisses out of hand my suggestion that her mistakes are the result of the particular lens through which she and much of the political science community view the American presidency. Yet this suggestion has the merit of explaining why she contends that piling up nineteenth-century instances of presidential public “speech” undermines Jeffrey Tulis’s contention that the nature of presidential speech changed decisively at the beginning of the twentieth century, such that rhetorical, often-demagogic appeals over the heads of Congress displaced public speech that affirmed the values of republican, constitutional government.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

诊断特朗普主义的盲目影响：对普卢塔的反驳

安妮·c·普鲁塔对我的批评的回复延续了我所批评文章的错误。我认为，她的错误是由于她和许多政治科学界人士看待美国总统职位的特殊视角造成的，普鲁塔当即驳斥了这一说法。然而，这一建议的优点在于，解释了为什么她认为，堆积19世纪总统公开“演讲”的实例，削弱了杰弗里·图利斯的论点，即总统演讲的性质在20世纪初发生了决定性的变化，这样，对国会领导人的修辞，往往是蛊惑人心的呼吁，取代了肯定共和党宪政价值观的公开演讲。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Critical Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society is a political-science journal dedicated to advancing political theory with an epistemological bent. Recurrent questions discussed in our pages include: How can political actors know what they need to know to effect positive social change? What are the sources of political actors’ beliefs? Are these sources reliable? Critical Review is the only journal in which the ideational determinants of political behavior are investigated empirically as well as being assessed for their normative implications. Thus, while normative political theorists are the main contributors to Critical Review, we also publish scholarship on the realities of public opinion, the media, technocratic decision making, ideological reasoning, and other empirical phenomena.

期刊最新文献

Depolarization Without Reconciliation Education and the Epistemological Crisis in the Age of ChatGPT Republicanizing Leviathan: Kant’s Cosmopolitan Synthesis of Hobbes and Rousseau Who Is Haunted by the Shadow Of God? Dialectical Notes on Michael Rosen’s Narrative of (Failed) Secularization Six Variations on Michael Rosen’s The Shadow of God