Comparative Evaluation of Bismuth-Silver and Bismuth-Tin Alloys for Plug and Abandonment

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM SPE Drilling & Completion Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.2118/202488-pa
Hua Zhang, T. Ramakrishnan, Elkady Youssef Magdy Abdou, Feng Yixuan, Q. Elias
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Bismuth-Silver and Bismuth-Tin Alloys for Plug and Abandonment","authors":"Hua Zhang, T. Ramakrishnan, Elkady Youssef Magdy Abdou, Feng Yixuan, Q. Elias","doi":"10.2118/202488-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As an alternative to cement, the feasibility of bismuth-tin (BiSn; contains 58 wt% Bi and 42 wt% Sn, abbreviations are not in stoichiometric ratio) as a low melting-point plug has been tested by Zhang et al. (2020) for rigless plug-and-abandonment (P&A) service of offshore wells. Similar to BiSn, bismuth-silver (BiAg; contains 97.5 wt% Bi and 2.5 wt% Ag, abbreviations are not in stoichiometric ratio) also exhibits desirable properties compared with Portland cement. However, because of its greater melting point, BiAg has potentially a wider application than BiSn, especially in deep formations. In the present study, we investigate the feasibility of BiAg alloy for P&A. The bond quality of the alloy-shale cores is evaluated through shear, tensile, push-out, and permeability tests, and compared with those of BiSn alloy-shale and cement-shale cores. To avoid phase change-induced shale damage at elevated temperature while setting BiAg plugs, water was first extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2). For shear and tensile tests with pinhole-anchored BiAg, the ultimate strength and modulus were measured as a function of anchor points at different temperatures (21, 80, and 110°C). For the push-out tests, shale samples of smooth, rough, and pinholed surfaces were prepared with the BiAg alloy plug. In general, we find that, without anchors, bond failure precedes shale failure. Results for cement-shale cores are also reported for comparison. We contrast the performance of BiAg and BiSn alloys at 21, 65, 80, and 110°C to determine the crossover temperature for deployment suitability.","PeriodicalId":51165,"journal":{"name":"SPE Drilling & Completion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2118/202488-pa","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Drilling & Completion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/202488-pa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As an alternative to cement, the feasibility of bismuth-tin (BiSn; contains 58 wt% Bi and 42 wt% Sn, abbreviations are not in stoichiometric ratio) as a low melting-point plug has been tested by Zhang et al. (2020) for rigless plug-and-abandonment (P&A) service of offshore wells. Similar to BiSn, bismuth-silver (BiAg; contains 97.5 wt% Bi and 2.5 wt% Ag, abbreviations are not in stoichiometric ratio) also exhibits desirable properties compared with Portland cement. However, because of its greater melting point, BiAg has potentially a wider application than BiSn, especially in deep formations. In the present study, we investigate the feasibility of BiAg alloy for P&A. The bond quality of the alloy-shale cores is evaluated through shear, tensile, push-out, and permeability tests, and compared with those of BiSn alloy-shale and cement-shale cores. To avoid phase change-induced shale damage at elevated temperature while setting BiAg plugs, water was first extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2). For shear and tensile tests with pinhole-anchored BiAg, the ultimate strength and modulus were measured as a function of anchor points at different temperatures (21, 80, and 110°C). For the push-out tests, shale samples of smooth, rough, and pinholed surfaces were prepared with the BiAg alloy plug. In general, we find that, without anchors, bond failure precedes shale failure. Results for cement-shale cores are also reported for comparison. We contrast the performance of BiAg and BiSn alloys at 21, 65, 80, and 110°C to determine the crossover temperature for deployment suitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铋-银和铋-锡合金堵塞和废弃的比较评价
作为水泥的替代品,铋锡(BiSn)的可行性;Zhang等人(2020年)已经在海上油井的无钻机桥塞弃井(P&A)服务中测试了一种低熔点桥塞,其中含有58 wt%的Bi和42 wt%的Sn(缩写不是化学计量比)。与BiSn类似,铋银(BiAg;含有97.5 wt% Bi和2.5 wt% Ag(缩写不是化学计量比),与波特兰水泥相比也表现出理想的性能。然而,由于BiAg的熔点更高,它比BiSn有更广泛的应用潜力,特别是在深层地层中。在本研究中,我们探讨了BiAg合金用于P&A的可行性。通过剪切、拉伸、推出、渗透率等测试,评价了合金-页岩岩心的黏结质量,并与BiSn合金-页岩岩心和水泥-页岩岩心进行了对比。为了避免BiAg桥塞在高温下发生相变导致的页岩损伤,首先用超临界二氧化碳(CO2)提取水。对于针孔锚定BiAg的剪切和拉伸试验,在不同温度(21、80和110°C)下测量了锚点的极限强度和模量。在推出测试中,使用BiAg合金塞制备了光滑、粗糙和针孔表面的页岩样品。通常,我们发现在没有锚的情况下,胶结破坏先于页岩破坏。还报道了水泥-页岩岩心的结果进行比较。我们对比了BiAg和BiSn合金在21、65、80和110℃下的性能,以确定交叉温度是否适合展开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SPE Drilling & Completion
SPE Drilling & Completion 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers horizontal and directional drilling, drilling fluids, bit technology, sand control, perforating, cementing, well control, completions and drilling operations.
期刊最新文献
Combining Magnetic and Gyroscopic Surveys Provides the Best Possible Accuracy Applications of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Hole Cleaning in Horizontal and Highly Deviated Wells Experimental Investigation of Geopolymers for Application in High-Temperature and Geothermal Well Cementing Analysis of Riser Gas Pressure from Full-Scale Gas-in-Riser Experiments with Instrumentation Correlating Surface and Downhole Perforation Entry Hole Measurements Leads to Development of Improved Perforating Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1