Characterization of Microgreen Growing Operations and Associated Food Safety Practices

Q4 Medicine Food Protection Trends Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4315/1541-9576-41.1.56
G. Misra, K. Gibson
{"title":"Characterization of Microgreen Growing Operations and Associated Food Safety Practices","authors":"G. Misra, K. Gibson","doi":"10.4315/1541-9576-41.1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microgreen growing operations are an emerging industry. This study represents the first national survey of microgreen growers in the United States. An online survey, answered by 176 growers, included questions about farm demographics, growing techniques, microgreen varieties grown, and food safety practices. Microgreen growing operations that earned <10,000 USD/year in microgreen revenue (62%) producing microgreens in trays on stacked, artificially lit shelves (40.3%) dominated the response pool. Most farms surveyed opened after 2010 (75%). These farms primarily grow microgreens using peat (17.6%), coco coir (14.2%), or soil (15.3%). Sunflower (28%), peas (27%), and radish (29%) were the most popular microgreen varieties produced. Chi-square tests of association were performed to identify relationships between farm characteristics and food safety practices. Statistically significant relationships were found between growing media testing at least once per year and total number of employees ( P = 0.015) and total number of employees who directly handle microgreens ( P = 0.001), possibly indicating that larger operations are better equipped to engage in routine quality assurance procedures. Production system type ( P = 0.001) and total number of employees ( P = 0.011) were associated with pregermination seed disinfection; however, in this instance, smaller operations (i.e., average of four employees) reported seed disinfection more frequently than larger operations. Routine documentation practices were also significantly associated with annual microgreen revenue ( P = 0.003), passing a good agricultural practices (GAP) audit ( P = 0.001), and number of previous food safety trainings attended ( P = 0.001). Overall, this study aims to inform research, outreach, and training efforts on the growing systems, microgreen varieties, and production practices relevant to microgreen safety.","PeriodicalId":38649,"journal":{"name":"Food Protection Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Protection Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4315/1541-9576-41.1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Microgreen growing operations are an emerging industry. This study represents the first national survey of microgreen growers in the United States. An online survey, answered by 176 growers, included questions about farm demographics, growing techniques, microgreen varieties grown, and food safety practices. Microgreen growing operations that earned <10,000 USD/year in microgreen revenue (62%) producing microgreens in trays on stacked, artificially lit shelves (40.3%) dominated the response pool. Most farms surveyed opened after 2010 (75%). These farms primarily grow microgreens using peat (17.6%), coco coir (14.2%), or soil (15.3%). Sunflower (28%), peas (27%), and radish (29%) were the most popular microgreen varieties produced. Chi-square tests of association were performed to identify relationships between farm characteristics and food safety practices. Statistically significant relationships were found between growing media testing at least once per year and total number of employees ( P = 0.015) and total number of employees who directly handle microgreens ( P = 0.001), possibly indicating that larger operations are better equipped to engage in routine quality assurance procedures. Production system type ( P = 0.001) and total number of employees ( P = 0.011) were associated with pregermination seed disinfection; however, in this instance, smaller operations (i.e., average of four employees) reported seed disinfection more frequently than larger operations. Routine documentation practices were also significantly associated with annual microgreen revenue ( P = 0.003), passing a good agricultural practices (GAP) audit ( P = 0.001), and number of previous food safety trainings attended ( P = 0.001). Overall, this study aims to inform research, outreach, and training efforts on the growing systems, microgreen varieties, and production practices relevant to microgreen safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microgreen种植操作的特点和相关的食品安全实践
微绿种植是一个新兴产业。这项研究代表了美国第一次对微绿种植者的全国性调查。176名种植者回答了一项在线调查,问题包括农场人口统计、种植技术、种植的微绿品种和食品安全措施。每年微绿收入低于1万美元的微绿种植业务(62%)在堆叠的人工照明货架上的托盘中生产微绿(40.3%)主导了响应池。大多数被调查的农场在2010年之后开业(75%)。这些农场主要使用泥炭(17.6%)、椰子(14.2%)或土壤(15.3%)种植微型蔬菜。向日葵(28%)、豌豆(27%)和萝卜(29%)是最受欢迎的微绿品种。进行卡方关联检验以确定农场特征与食品安全措施之间的关系。每年至少进行一次培养基测试与员工总数(P = 0.015)和直接处理微型蔬菜的员工总数(P = 0.001)之间存在统计学上显著的关系,这可能表明规模较大的工厂更有能力参与常规的质量保证程序。生产系统类型(P = 0.001)和员工总数(P = 0.011)与发芽前种子消毒相关;然而,在这种情况下,较小的业务(即平均四名雇员)报告的种子消毒频率高于较大的业务。常规文件编制实践也与年度微绿收入(P = 0.003)、通过良好农业规范(GAP)审核(P = 0.001)和之前参加食品安全培训的次数(P = 0.001)显著相关。总体而言,本研究旨在为与微绿安全相关的种植系统、微绿品种和生产实践的研究、推广和培训工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Protection Trends
Food Protection Trends Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Examining Age and Food Irradiation Knowledge as Influential Factors on Purchase of Irradiated Foods - United States, August 2022. Focus Groups Exploring U.S. Adults' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Irradiation as a Food Safety Intervention, 2021. Evaluating Misinformation on YouTube about Washing Produce Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemi Minimally Processed Vegetables: Consumer Profile, Consumption Habits, and Perceptions of Microbiological Risk Perceptions of Risk, Control, and Responsibility Regarding Food Safety among Consumers in Lebanon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1