Development and evaluation of PCR primers for environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of Amphibia

Masayuki K. Sakata, Mone U. Kawata, A. Kurabayashi, Takaki Kurita, Masatoshi Nakamura, Tomoyasu Shirako, R. Kakehashi, K. Nishikawa, Mohamad Yazid Hossman, T. Nishijima, Junichi Kabamoto, M. Miya, T. Minamoto
{"title":"Development and evaluation of PCR primers for environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of Amphibia","authors":"Masayuki K. Sakata, Mone U. Kawata, A. Kurabayashi, Takaki Kurita, Masatoshi Nakamura, Tomoyasu Shirako, R. Kakehashi, K. Nishikawa, Mohamad Yazid Hossman, T. Nishijima, Junichi Kabamoto, M. Miya, T. Minamoto","doi":"10.3897/mbmg.6.76534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biodiversity monitoring is important for the conservation of natural ecosystems in general, but particularly for amphibians, whose populations are pronouncedly declining. However, amphibians’ ecological traits (e.g. nocturnal or aquatic) often prevent their precise monitoring. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding – analysis of extra-organismal DNA released into the environment – allows the easy and effective monitoring of the biodiversity of aquatic organisms. Here, we developed and tested the utility of original PCR primer sets. First, we conducted in vitro PCR amplification tests with universal primer candidates using total DNA extracted from amphibian tissues. Five primer sets successfully amplified the target DNA fragments (partial 16S rRNA gene fragments of 160–311 bp) from all 16 taxa tested (from the three living amphibian orders Anura, Caudata and Gymnophiona). Next, we investigated the taxonomic resolution retrieved using each primer set. The results revealed that the universal primer set “Amph16S” had the highest resolution amongst the tested sets. Finally, we applied Amph16S to the water samples collected in the field and evaluated its detection capability by comparing the species detected using eDNA and physical survey (capture-based sampling and visual survey) in multiple agricultural ecosystems across Japan (160 sites in 10 areas). The eDNA metabarcoding with Amph16S detected twice as many species as the physical surveys (16 vs. 8 species, respectively), indicating the effectiveness of Amph16S in biodiversity monitoring and ecological research for amphibian communities.","PeriodicalId":18374,"journal":{"name":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.6.76534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Biodiversity monitoring is important for the conservation of natural ecosystems in general, but particularly for amphibians, whose populations are pronouncedly declining. However, amphibians’ ecological traits (e.g. nocturnal or aquatic) often prevent their precise monitoring. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding – analysis of extra-organismal DNA released into the environment – allows the easy and effective monitoring of the biodiversity of aquatic organisms. Here, we developed and tested the utility of original PCR primer sets. First, we conducted in vitro PCR amplification tests with universal primer candidates using total DNA extracted from amphibian tissues. Five primer sets successfully amplified the target DNA fragments (partial 16S rRNA gene fragments of 160–311 bp) from all 16 taxa tested (from the three living amphibian orders Anura, Caudata and Gymnophiona). Next, we investigated the taxonomic resolution retrieved using each primer set. The results revealed that the universal primer set “Amph16S” had the highest resolution amongst the tested sets. Finally, we applied Amph16S to the water samples collected in the field and evaluated its detection capability by comparing the species detected using eDNA and physical survey (capture-based sampling and visual survey) in multiple agricultural ecosystems across Japan (160 sites in 10 areas). The eDNA metabarcoding with Amph16S detected twice as many species as the physical surveys (16 vs. 8 species, respectively), indicating the effectiveness of Amph16S in biodiversity monitoring and ecological research for amphibian communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development及两栖类环境DNA元条形码PCR引物评价
总的来说,生物多样性监测对自然生态系统的保护很重要,尤其是对两栖动物来说,它们的数量正在明显下降。然而,两栖动物的生态特性(如夜行或水生)往往阻碍了它们的精确监测。环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码-分析释放到环境中的生物外DNA -允许对水生生物的生物多样性进行简单有效的监测。在这里,我们开发并测试了原始PCR引物集的实用性。首先,我们用从两栖动物组织中提取的总DNA进行了通用引物候选物的体外PCR扩增试验。5组引物成功扩增了所有16个分类群(无尾目、尾目和裸子目)的目标DNA片段(部分16S rRNA基因片段为160-311 bp)。接下来,我们研究了使用每个引物集检索到的分类分辨率。结果表明,通用引物“Amph16S”具有最高的分辨率。最后,我们将Amph16S应用于现场采集的水样,并通过比较日本多个农业生态系统(10个地区160个站点)中使用eDNA和物理调查(基于捕获的采样和目视调查)检测到的物种来评估其检测能力。利用Amph16S编码的eDNA元条形码检测到的物种数量是物理调查的两倍(分别为16种和8种),表明Amph16S在两栖动物群落生物多样性监测和生态学研究中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Simple approaches for evaluation of OTU quality based on dissimilarity arrays Assessing the diversity of nematodes in the Store Mosse National Park (Sweden) using metabarcoding Halamphora taxa in Hungarian soda pans and shallow soda lakes detected via metabarcoding and microscopic analyses Insights into the ecological impact of trout introduction in an oligotrophic lake using sedimentary environmental DNA Exploring benthic diatom diversity in the West Antarctic Peninsula: insights from a morphological and molecular approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1