Edward T. Chiyaka, B. Lanese, D. Bruckman, M. Redding, Joshua Filla, Pamela Ferguson, John A. Hoornbeek
{"title":"Influence of interaction between community health workers and adults with chronic diseases on risk mitigation through care coordination","authors":"Edward T. Chiyaka, B. Lanese, D. Bruckman, M. Redding, Joshua Filla, Pamela Ferguson, John A. Hoornbeek","doi":"10.1177/20534345221092515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Addressing health disparities and barriers to care requires a comprehensive approach that involves participation of health care providers, multiple organizations, and service providers in the communities affected. Given the importance of using community health workers to help address the complex and overlapping medical, social, and behavioral needs of high-risk individuals, it is of utmost importance to understand their impact on health outcomes. This study examines how in-person interaction between community health workers and their clients influence the client's level of risk mitigation achieved through care coordination using the Pathways Community HUB model. Methods The study utilized two years of data extracted from the Care Coordination Systems database for 391 adults who participated in the Northwest Ohio Pathways Community HUB program. Using multinomial logistic regression analysis, we assessed how the interaction between community health workers and adults with chronic diseases who participated in the Northwest Ohio Pathways Community HUB program influenced the successful mitigation of their social, behavioral, and other medical risks over a 2-year period. Results Our findings show that as the number of in-person contacts between the community health worker and the client increased, the likelihood of completing all Pathways increased by 27% when compared to completing less than 50% of the assigned Pathways, after adjusting for potential confounders (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.07−1.52). Discussion Using community health workers as part of care coordination teams may be effective in connecting communities to systems of care, helping individuals manage their health conditions and connecting individuals to needed social services. Their direct in-person interaction with at-risk individuals may increase the extent to which these individuals successfully address risks to their health and well-being.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20534345221092515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction Addressing health disparities and barriers to care requires a comprehensive approach that involves participation of health care providers, multiple organizations, and service providers in the communities affected. Given the importance of using community health workers to help address the complex and overlapping medical, social, and behavioral needs of high-risk individuals, it is of utmost importance to understand their impact on health outcomes. This study examines how in-person interaction between community health workers and their clients influence the client's level of risk mitigation achieved through care coordination using the Pathways Community HUB model. Methods The study utilized two years of data extracted from the Care Coordination Systems database for 391 adults who participated in the Northwest Ohio Pathways Community HUB program. Using multinomial logistic regression analysis, we assessed how the interaction between community health workers and adults with chronic diseases who participated in the Northwest Ohio Pathways Community HUB program influenced the successful mitigation of their social, behavioral, and other medical risks over a 2-year period. Results Our findings show that as the number of in-person contacts between the community health worker and the client increased, the likelihood of completing all Pathways increased by 27% when compared to completing less than 50% of the assigned Pathways, after adjusting for potential confounders (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.07−1.52). Discussion Using community health workers as part of care coordination teams may be effective in connecting communities to systems of care, helping individuals manage their health conditions and connecting individuals to needed social services. Their direct in-person interaction with at-risk individuals may increase the extent to which these individuals successfully address risks to their health and well-being.
引言解决健康差距和护理障碍需要一种全面的方法,包括受影响社区的医疗保健提供者、多个组织和服务提供者的参与。鉴于利用社区卫生工作者来帮助解决高危人群复杂和重叠的医疗、社会和行为需求的重要性,了解他们对健康结果的影响至关重要。本研究考察了社区卫生工作者及其客户之间的面对面互动如何影响客户通过使用Pathways community HUB模型的护理协调实现的风险缓解水平。方法该研究使用了从护理协调系统数据库中提取的两年数据,共有391名成年人参加了俄亥俄州西北路径社区HUB项目。使用多项逻辑回归分析,我们评估了社区卫生工作者和参与俄亥俄州西北路径社区HUB计划的慢性病成年人之间的互动如何影响他们在2年内成功缓解社会、行为和其他医疗风险。结果我们的研究结果表明,随着社区卫生工作者和客户之间面对面的接触次数的增加,与完成不到50%的指定路径相比,完成所有路径的可能性增加了27%,讨论将社区卫生工作者作为护理协调团队的一部分,可以有效地将社区与护理系统联系起来,帮助个人管理自己的健康状况,并将个人与所需的社会服务联系起来。他们与高危人群的直接面对面互动可能会增加这些人成功应对健康和福祉风险的程度。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.