M. Mavroulidou, C. Gray, L. Pantoja-Muñoz, M. Gunn
{"title":"An assessment of different alkali-activated cements as stabilisers of sulphate-bearing soils","authors":"M. Mavroulidou, C. Gray, L. Pantoja-Muñoz, M. Gunn","doi":"10.1144/qjegh2022-057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The stabilization of sulphate-bearing soils with traditional calcium-based stabilisers is not recommended, as reactions between the calcium and sulphates in the presence of water could lead to soil heave. Alternative stabilization methods are therefore required, and this paper proposes innovative alkali-activated cements (AAC), whose use for soil stabilisation and especially sulphate-bearing soils is little researched. To fill this knowledge gap, AAC systems with ground granulated blastfurnace slag precursor and different alkaline activators including commercial lime, wastepaper sludge ash (PSA), potassium hydroxide (KOH) and potassium carbonate (K\n 2\n CO\n 3\n ) were used to treat an artificial sulphate-bearing clay. AAC-treated clay specimens cured for 7 and 28 days respectively were soaked in water for 45 days; their one-dimensional swelling, unconfined compressive strength, pH, and ultrasonic pulse velocity were measured and compared to those of specimens not exposed to water. Material characterisation (SEM-EDS, Raman spectroscopy and FTIR) was performed to attest cementation and detect ettringite. In AAC systems, CaO/Ca(OH)\n 2\n did not lead to specimen heave and damage and developed the highest strengths. Potassium-based activators performed less well but combined PSA-K\n 2\n CO\n 3\n led to strength gain in time. Overall AAC led to higher strengths than lime only or lime and admixtures and show promise as sulphate-bearing soil stabilisers.\n \n \n Thematic collection:\n This article is part of the Leading to Innovative Engineering Geology Practices collection available at:\n https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/leading-to-innovative-engineering-geology-practices\n","PeriodicalId":20937,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The stabilization of sulphate-bearing soils with traditional calcium-based stabilisers is not recommended, as reactions between the calcium and sulphates in the presence of water could lead to soil heave. Alternative stabilization methods are therefore required, and this paper proposes innovative alkali-activated cements (AAC), whose use for soil stabilisation and especially sulphate-bearing soils is little researched. To fill this knowledge gap, AAC systems with ground granulated blastfurnace slag precursor and different alkaline activators including commercial lime, wastepaper sludge ash (PSA), potassium hydroxide (KOH) and potassium carbonate (K
2
CO
3
) were used to treat an artificial sulphate-bearing clay. AAC-treated clay specimens cured for 7 and 28 days respectively were soaked in water for 45 days; their one-dimensional swelling, unconfined compressive strength, pH, and ultrasonic pulse velocity were measured and compared to those of specimens not exposed to water. Material characterisation (SEM-EDS, Raman spectroscopy and FTIR) was performed to attest cementation and detect ettringite. In AAC systems, CaO/Ca(OH)
2
did not lead to specimen heave and damage and developed the highest strengths. Potassium-based activators performed less well but combined PSA-K
2
CO
3
led to strength gain in time. Overall AAC led to higher strengths than lime only or lime and admixtures and show promise as sulphate-bearing soil stabilisers.
Thematic collection:
This article is part of the Leading to Innovative Engineering Geology Practices collection available at:
https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/leading-to-innovative-engineering-geology-practices
期刊介绍:
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology is owned by the Geological Society of London and published by the Geological Society Publishing House.
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology (QJEGH) is an established peer reviewed international journal featuring papers on geology as applied to civil engineering mining practice and water resources. Papers are invited from, and about, all areas of the world on engineering geology and hydrogeology topics. This includes but is not limited to: applied geophysics, engineering geomorphology, environmental geology, hydrogeology, groundwater quality, ground source heat, contaminated land, waste management, land use planning, geotechnics, rock mechanics, geomaterials and geological hazards.
The journal publishes the prestigious Glossop and Ineson lectures, research papers, case studies, review articles, technical notes, photographic features, thematic sets, discussion papers, editorial opinion and book reviews.