Portraying Friendship by the Book

IF 0.4 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Erasmus Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI:10.1163/18749275-04102002
R. Gibson
{"title":"Portraying Friendship by the Book","authors":"R. Gibson","doi":"10.1163/18749275-04102002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article responds to the philosopher Alexander Nehamas’ argument that “no gesture, look, or bodily disposition, no attitude, feeling, or emotion, no action and no situation is associated with friendship firmly enough to make its representation a matter for the eye.” The article proposes a “humanist exception” to Nehamas’ general rule. Building on Lorna Hutson’s argument that humanism “textualized” friendship, I contend that in the early modern period scholars and artists associated with humanism were engaged in the development of a set of recognizable signs of friendship connected to the distinctive humanist culture of the book and associated activities of reading, writing, and circulating texts. The article offers a case study of Quentin Metsys’ diptych of Erasmus and Pieter Gillis (1517) and then applies the lessons gleaned from that work to a picture that Nehamas cites as evidence of his claim, Jacopo Pontormo’s Two Men with a Passage from Cicero’s “On Friendship” (ca. 1522). Both pictures, I contend, not only depict friendship but also promote humanist ideals of friendship to the viewer.","PeriodicalId":40983,"journal":{"name":"Erasmus Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erasmus Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18749275-04102002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article responds to the philosopher Alexander Nehamas’ argument that “no gesture, look, or bodily disposition, no attitude, feeling, or emotion, no action and no situation is associated with friendship firmly enough to make its representation a matter for the eye.” The article proposes a “humanist exception” to Nehamas’ general rule. Building on Lorna Hutson’s argument that humanism “textualized” friendship, I contend that in the early modern period scholars and artists associated with humanism were engaged in the development of a set of recognizable signs of friendship connected to the distinctive humanist culture of the book and associated activities of reading, writing, and circulating texts. The article offers a case study of Quentin Metsys’ diptych of Erasmus and Pieter Gillis (1517) and then applies the lessons gleaned from that work to a picture that Nehamas cites as evidence of his claim, Jacopo Pontormo’s Two Men with a Passage from Cicero’s “On Friendship” (ca. 1522). Both pictures, I contend, not only depict friendship but also promote humanist ideals of friendship to the viewer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用书本描绘友谊
这篇文章回应了哲学家亚历山大·尼哈玛斯的论点,即“没有任何手势、表情或身体倾向,没有任何态度、感觉或情感,没有任何行动和情况与友谊紧密相连,足以使友谊的表现成为一件肉眼可见的事。”这篇文章提出了尼哈玛斯一般规则的“人道主义例外”。基于Lorna Hutson关于人文主义“文本化”友谊的论点,我认为,在现代早期,与人文主义相关的学者和艺术家参与了一系列可识别的友谊迹象的发展,这些迹象与该书独特的人文主义文化以及阅读、写作和流传文本的相关活动有关。这篇文章对昆汀·梅斯的伊拉斯谟和皮特·吉利斯(1517年)的三联画进行了个案研究,然后将从这幅作品中吸取的教训应用到尼哈玛斯引用的一幅照片上,即雅克波·蓬托莫(Jacobo Pontomo)从西塞罗(Cicero)的《论友谊》(On Friendship)(约1522年)中创作的《两个人有一段路》(Two Men with a Passage),不仅描绘了友谊,而且向观众宣传了人文主义的友谊理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Erasmus Studies
Erasmus Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Praised and Maligned: Receptions of Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament Mourning an Oenophile Abbreviations Bibliography of Selected Secondary Sources on Erasmus and Gender “The Place of Speaking for a Speaking That Has No Place”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1