{"title":"Portraying Friendship by the Book","authors":"R. Gibson","doi":"10.1163/18749275-04102002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article responds to the philosopher Alexander Nehamas’ argument that “no gesture, look, or bodily disposition, no attitude, feeling, or emotion, no action and no situation is associated with friendship firmly enough to make its representation a matter for the eye.” The article proposes a “humanist exception” to Nehamas’ general rule. Building on Lorna Hutson’s argument that humanism “textualized” friendship, I contend that in the early modern period scholars and artists associated with humanism were engaged in the development of a set of recognizable signs of friendship connected to the distinctive humanist culture of the book and associated activities of reading, writing, and circulating texts. The article offers a case study of Quentin Metsys’ diptych of Erasmus and Pieter Gillis (1517) and then applies the lessons gleaned from that work to a picture that Nehamas cites as evidence of his claim, Jacopo Pontormo’s Two Men with a Passage from Cicero’s “On Friendship” (ca. 1522). Both pictures, I contend, not only depict friendship but also promote humanist ideals of friendship to the viewer.","PeriodicalId":40983,"journal":{"name":"Erasmus Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erasmus Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18749275-04102002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article responds to the philosopher Alexander Nehamas’ argument that “no gesture, look, or bodily disposition, no attitude, feeling, or emotion, no action and no situation is associated with friendship firmly enough to make its representation a matter for the eye.” The article proposes a “humanist exception” to Nehamas’ general rule. Building on Lorna Hutson’s argument that humanism “textualized” friendship, I contend that in the early modern period scholars and artists associated with humanism were engaged in the development of a set of recognizable signs of friendship connected to the distinctive humanist culture of the book and associated activities of reading, writing, and circulating texts. The article offers a case study of Quentin Metsys’ diptych of Erasmus and Pieter Gillis (1517) and then applies the lessons gleaned from that work to a picture that Nehamas cites as evidence of his claim, Jacopo Pontormo’s Two Men with a Passage from Cicero’s “On Friendship” (ca. 1522). Both pictures, I contend, not only depict friendship but also promote humanist ideals of friendship to the viewer.
这篇文章回应了哲学家亚历山大·尼哈玛斯的论点,即“没有任何手势、表情或身体倾向,没有任何态度、感觉或情感,没有任何行动和情况与友谊紧密相连,足以使友谊的表现成为一件肉眼可见的事。”这篇文章提出了尼哈玛斯一般规则的“人道主义例外”。基于Lorna Hutson关于人文主义“文本化”友谊的论点,我认为,在现代早期,与人文主义相关的学者和艺术家参与了一系列可识别的友谊迹象的发展,这些迹象与该书独特的人文主义文化以及阅读、写作和流传文本的相关活动有关。这篇文章对昆汀·梅斯的伊拉斯谟和皮特·吉利斯(1517年)的三联画进行了个案研究,然后将从这幅作品中吸取的教训应用到尼哈玛斯引用的一幅照片上,即雅克波·蓬托莫(Jacobo Pontomo)从西塞罗(Cicero)的《论友谊》(On Friendship)(约1522年)中创作的《两个人有一段路》(Two Men with a Passage),不仅描绘了友谊,而且向观众宣传了人文主义的友谊理想。