Relational fragility, development and an emerging self: service user views of engaging in an IIRMS in the OPD pathway

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Practice Pub Date : 2019-08-12 DOI:10.1108/JFP-02-2019-0007
S. Ryan, F. Gordon, N. Gordon
{"title":"Relational fragility, development and an emerging self: service user views of engaging in an IIRMS in the OPD pathway","authors":"S. Ryan, F. Gordon, N. Gordon","doi":"10.1108/JFP-02-2019-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to gain an in-depth view into how participants perceived their experience of engaging in an enhanced Intensive Intervention and Risk Management Service (IIRMS), which is a part of the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) pathway based within the community.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFive participants were interviewed. They were at different points of engagement with the service. Interviews were taped, transcribed and analysed using the grounded theory methodology.\n\n\nFindings\nParticipants were able to provide in-depth reflections about their experiences at the service. The main issues centred upon “managing fragile relationships” and “an emerging self”. Subcategories linked to managing fragile relationships were: “letting people in and keeping them away”; “surviving the ruptures”; and “treating me like a person”. Subcategories linked to an emerging self were: “readiness to change” and “making new connections”.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study focused upon one enhanced IIRMS and findings are not necessarily generalisable to other services within the OPD pathway, although themes are likely to resonate for those leaving custody with complex interpersonal difficulties.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study has provided access to participants’ perspectives on engaging with an IIRMS. Many factors impact upon the individual’s journey, which is central to the relational approach underpinning the pathway.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe findings have important messages for service providers and commissioners and crucially service user perspectives have been obtained that are integral to future development of the OPD pathway. The findings are also relevant for released prisoners attempting to reintegrate within the community.\n","PeriodicalId":44049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JFP-02-2019-0007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-02-2019-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to gain an in-depth view into how participants perceived their experience of engaging in an enhanced Intensive Intervention and Risk Management Service (IIRMS), which is a part of the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) pathway based within the community. Design/methodology/approach Five participants were interviewed. They were at different points of engagement with the service. Interviews were taped, transcribed and analysed using the grounded theory methodology. Findings Participants were able to provide in-depth reflections about their experiences at the service. The main issues centred upon “managing fragile relationships” and “an emerging self”. Subcategories linked to managing fragile relationships were: “letting people in and keeping them away”; “surviving the ruptures”; and “treating me like a person”. Subcategories linked to an emerging self were: “readiness to change” and “making new connections”. Research limitations/implications This study focused upon one enhanced IIRMS and findings are not necessarily generalisable to other services within the OPD pathway, although themes are likely to resonate for those leaving custody with complex interpersonal difficulties. Practical implications This study has provided access to participants’ perspectives on engaging with an IIRMS. Many factors impact upon the individual’s journey, which is central to the relational approach underpinning the pathway. Originality/value The findings have important messages for service providers and commissioners and crucially service user perspectives have been obtained that are integral to future development of the OPD pathway. The findings are also relevant for released prisoners attempting to reintegrate within the community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系脆弱性、发展和新兴自我:服务用户在OPD途径中参与IIRMS的观点
本文的目的是深入了解参与者如何感知他们参与强化强化干预和风险管理服务(IIRMS)的经历,这是基于社区的罪犯人格障碍(OPD)途径的一部分。设计/方法/方法五名参与者接受了采访。他们处于与服务的不同接触点。访谈录音,转录和分析使用接地理论的方法。参与者能够深入地反思他们在服务中的经历。主要的问题集中在“处理脆弱的关系”和“一个新兴的自我”上。与管理脆弱关系相关的子类别有:“让人们进入并远离他们”;“从破裂中幸存下来”;还有"把我当人看待"与新兴自我相关的子类别有:“准备改变”和“建立新关系”。研究局限性/意义本研究集中于一个增强的IIRMS,研究结果不一定适用于OPD途径中的其他服务,尽管主题可能会引起那些离开监护的复杂人际关系困难的人的共鸣。实际意义本研究提供了参与者参与IIRMS的观点。许多因素影响着个人的旅程,这是支撑路径的关系方法的核心。这些发现为服务提供商和专员提供了重要信息,并获得了至关重要的服务用户观点,这是OPD途径未来发展不可或缺的一部分。研究结果也与试图重新融入社区的释放囚犯有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Practice
Journal of Forensic Practice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Two studies evaluating the Stoicism programme at a foreign national prison A preliminary exploration of using the power threat meaning framework with individuals currently serving IPP sentences in custody Enough is enough: treatment dropout predictors of adolescents with harmful sexual behaviors in a New Zealand community sample Are indeterminate sentenced prisoners prepared for open prison? Practical implications/applications of an exploratory study in an English open prison Exploring the impact of custodial parkrun in an English women’s prison: HMPPS psychologists and partners delivering a best practice evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1