BULGARIAN ADAPTATION OF THE “HOPE”, “BOREDOM” AND “HELPLESSNESS” SCALES FROM ACHIEVEMENT EMOTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE (PART I): NOB CLASS-RELATED SCALE

Q4 Psychology Psychological Thought Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.37708/psyct.v14i1.522
Penka Hristova, D. Atanasov
{"title":"BULGARIAN ADAPTATION OF THE “HOPE”, “BOREDOM” AND “HELPLESSNESS” SCALES FROM ACHIEVEMENT EMOTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE (PART I): NOB CLASS-RELATED SCALE","authors":"Penka Hristova, D. Atanasov","doi":"10.37708/psyct.v14i1.522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bulgarian adaptation of the “hope”, “boredom” and “hopelessness” scales of the Achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ) was accomplished within a representative sample of 800 students. The Confirmatory and Exploratory analyses revealed that the 3 factor model with the three discrete emotions (hope, boredom, and hopelessness), standing for each of the individual factors, had an adequate fit. The reliability of the adapted scales is good (,80 McDonald’s omega ,90). The validity of the instrument assessed with the between-scale correlations of the adapted scale (positive correlation between the same emotional valence and negative correlation between the different emotional valence scales) and the correlations between the adapted scales and the subject grade, GPA, and state exam grades of 7th graders are theoretically and empirically consistent. The same results for the reliability, validity, and internal structure of the adapted scale were confirmed in a subsequent study with an independent sample of 255 respondents. ","PeriodicalId":37380,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Thought","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v14i1.522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bulgarian adaptation of the “hope”, “boredom” and “hopelessness” scales of the Achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ) was accomplished within a representative sample of 800 students. The Confirmatory and Exploratory analyses revealed that the 3 factor model with the three discrete emotions (hope, boredom, and hopelessness), standing for each of the individual factors, had an adequate fit. The reliability of the adapted scales is good (,80 McDonald’s omega ,90). The validity of the instrument assessed with the between-scale correlations of the adapted scale (positive correlation between the same emotional valence and negative correlation between the different emotional valence scales) and the correlations between the adapted scales and the subject grade, GPA, and state exam grades of 7th graders are theoretically and empirically consistent. The same results for the reliability, validity, and internal structure of the adapted scale were confirmed in a subsequent study with an independent sample of 255 respondents. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成就情绪问卷对“希望”、“无聊”和“无助”量表的保加利亚式改编(上):NOB类相关量表
保加利亚对成就情绪问卷(AEQ)中的“希望”、“无聊”和“绝望”量表的改编是在800名学生的代表性样本中完成的。验证性和探索性分析表明,具有三种离散情绪(希望、无聊和绝望)的三因素模型,代表每个单独的因素,具有足够的拟合性。调整后的天平的可靠性良好(,80麦当劳ω,90)。采用适应量表的量表间相关性(相同情绪效价之间的正相关性和不同情绪效价量表之间的负相关性)以及适应量表与七年级学生的科目成绩、GPA和州考试成绩之间的相关性评估的工具的有效性在理论和实证上是一致的。在随后的一项研究中,255名受访者的独立样本证实了适用量表的可靠性、有效性和内部结构的相同结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Thought
Psychological Thought Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Psychological Thought" publishes its papers in English or in Bulgarian in all areas of psychology. It is focused on the psychological theory and practice. The papers could be some original research articles, meta-analysis data, clinical reports, case studies, students'' essays, and book reviews. This journal is designed for psychologists, researchers, and psychology students.
期刊最新文献
POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY: GENESIS, STATUS, AND PROSPECTS. INTERVIEW WITH PROF. RUMEN STAMATOV, PH.D., D.SC. VALIDATION STUDY OF THE SPANISH VERSION OF THE PANDEMIC (COVID-19) ANXIETY TRAVEL SCALE IN PERU A SINGLE CASE STUDY IMPLEMENTING A 12-SESSION REHABILITATION JOURNEY: LESSONS LEARNED FROM 'CURTAIN DOWN' TO 'CURTAIN UP' REVIEW OF THE BOOK "PSYCHOANALYSIS IN BULGARIA UNTIL THE 40S OF THE 20TH CENTURY", WRITTEN BY ASSOC. PROF. STOIL MAVRODIEV, D.SC. TEST OF INVARIANCE OF THE ANOMIE BRIEF SCALE WITH THE ALIGNMENT METHOD IN 12 LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1