Updating threshold for IMO cost-benefit assessment

IF 1.4 Q3 ENGINEERING, MARINE Ship Technology Research Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.1080/09377255.2023.2184049
R. Hamann, J. Cichowicz
{"title":"Updating threshold for IMO cost-benefit assessment","authors":"R. Hamann, J. Cichowicz","doi":"10.1080/09377255.2023.2184049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The International Maritime Organization rule-making process utilizes a set of guidelines for the so-called Formal Safety Assessment (FSA). This process is based on a risk assessment and its purpose is to ensure that the risk to human health and life and to marine environment is tolerable. A central instrument in the FSA methodology is known as ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) principle which ensures that the risk is controlled in a rational and cost-effective manner. The FSA Guidelines recommend the use of monetary thresholds for performing the cost evaluation and provide an example of indices for measuring the cost efficiency. For risks involving fatalities, these measures require the use of a monetary threshold derived from the concept of Cost of Averting a Fatality (CAF). Due to the linkage to economic parameters, this threshold needs to be updated regularly to allow for correct cost-benefit assessment in the FSA context.","PeriodicalId":51883,"journal":{"name":"Ship Technology Research","volume":"70 1","pages":"239 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ship Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2023.2184049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The International Maritime Organization rule-making process utilizes a set of guidelines for the so-called Formal Safety Assessment (FSA). This process is based on a risk assessment and its purpose is to ensure that the risk to human health and life and to marine environment is tolerable. A central instrument in the FSA methodology is known as ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) principle which ensures that the risk is controlled in a rational and cost-effective manner. The FSA Guidelines recommend the use of monetary thresholds for performing the cost evaluation and provide an example of indices for measuring the cost efficiency. For risks involving fatalities, these measures require the use of a monetary threshold derived from the concept of Cost of Averting a Fatality (CAF). Due to the linkage to economic parameters, this threshold needs to be updated regularly to allow for correct cost-benefit assessment in the FSA context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更新海事组织成本效益评估阈值
摘要国际海事组织的规则制定过程采用了一套所谓的正式安全评估(FSA)指南。这一过程以风险评估为基础,其目的是确保对人类健康、生命和海洋环境的风险是可以容忍的。FSA方法中的一个核心工具被称为ALARP(尽可能低的合理可行)原则,该原则确保以合理和具有成本效益的方式控制风险。FSA指南建议使用货币阈值进行成本评估,并提供了衡量成本效率的指数示例。对于涉及死亡的风险,这些措施要求使用源自避免死亡成本(CAF)概念的货币阈值。由于与经济参数有关,需要定期更新这一阈值,以便在FSA背景下进行正确的成本效益评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ship Technology Research
Ship Technology Research ENGINEERING, MARINE-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Measurements of steady manoeuvring forces and moments over an axisymmetric body with appendages in a wind tunnel Practical ship afterbody optimization by multifidelity techniques Unsteady ship–bank interaction: a comparison between experimental and computational predictions A new power prediction method using ship in-service data: a case study on a general cargo ship Active flow control applied to a ship rudder model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1