Periods for Profit and the Rise of Menstrual Surveillance

M. Gilman
{"title":"Periods for Profit and the Rise of Menstrual Surveillance","authors":"M. Gilman","doi":"10.52214/cjgl.v41i1.8824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nMenstruation is being monetized and surveilled, with the voluntary participation of millions of women. Thousands of downloadable apps promise to help women monitor their periods and manage their fertility. These apps are part of the broader, multi-billion dollar, Femtech industry, which sells technology to help women understand and improve their health. Femtech is marketed with the language of female autonomy and feminist empowerment. Despite this rhetoric, Femtech is part of a broader business strategy of data extraction, in which companies are extracting people’s personal data for profit, typically without their knowledge or meaningful consent. Femtech can oppress menstruators in several ways. Menstruators lose control over their personal data and how it is used. Some of these uses can potentially disadvantage women in the workplace, insurance markets, and credit scoring. In addition, these apps can force users into a gendered binary that does not always comport with their identity. Further, period trackers are sometimes inaccurate, leading to unwanted pregnancies. Additionally, the data is nearly impossible to erase, leading some women to be tracked relentlessly across the web with assumptions about their childbearing and fertility. Despite these harms, there are few legal restraints on menstrual surveillance. American data privacy law largely hinges on the concept of notice and consent, which puts the onus on people to protect their own privacy rather than placing responsibility on the entities that gather and use data. Yet notice and consent is a myth because consumers do not read, cannot comprehend, and have no opportunities to negotiate the terms of privacy policies. Notice and consent is an individualistic approach to data privacy that envisions an atomized person pursing their own self-interest in a competitive marketplace. Menstruators’ needs do not fit this model. Accordingly, this Essay seeks to reconceptualize Femtech within an expanded menstrual justice framework that recognizes the tenets of data feminism. In this vision, Femtech would be an empowering and accurate health tool rather than a data extraction device. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":84468,"journal":{"name":"Columbia journal of gender and law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia journal of gender and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/cjgl.v41i1.8824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Menstruation is being monetized and surveilled, with the voluntary participation of millions of women. Thousands of downloadable apps promise to help women monitor their periods and manage their fertility. These apps are part of the broader, multi-billion dollar, Femtech industry, which sells technology to help women understand and improve their health. Femtech is marketed with the language of female autonomy and feminist empowerment. Despite this rhetoric, Femtech is part of a broader business strategy of data extraction, in which companies are extracting people’s personal data for profit, typically without their knowledge or meaningful consent. Femtech can oppress menstruators in several ways. Menstruators lose control over their personal data and how it is used. Some of these uses can potentially disadvantage women in the workplace, insurance markets, and credit scoring. In addition, these apps can force users into a gendered binary that does not always comport with their identity. Further, period trackers are sometimes inaccurate, leading to unwanted pregnancies. Additionally, the data is nearly impossible to erase, leading some women to be tracked relentlessly across the web with assumptions about their childbearing and fertility. Despite these harms, there are few legal restraints on menstrual surveillance. American data privacy law largely hinges on the concept of notice and consent, which puts the onus on people to protect their own privacy rather than placing responsibility on the entities that gather and use data. Yet notice and consent is a myth because consumers do not read, cannot comprehend, and have no opportunities to negotiate the terms of privacy policies. Notice and consent is an individualistic approach to data privacy that envisions an atomized person pursing their own self-interest in a competitive marketplace. Menstruators’ needs do not fit this model. Accordingly, this Essay seeks to reconceptualize Femtech within an expanded menstrual justice framework that recognizes the tenets of data feminism. In this vision, Femtech would be an empowering and accurate health tool rather than a data extraction device.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获利期与月经监测的兴起
在数百万女性的自愿参与下,月经正在被货币化和监控。成千上万的可下载应用程序承诺帮助女性监测月经和控制生育能力。这些应用是规模数十亿美元的Femtech行业的一部分,该行业销售帮助女性了解和改善自身健康状况的技术。Femtech的营销语言是女性自主和女权主义赋权。尽管有这种说法,但Femtech是更广泛的数据提取商业战略的一部分,在这种战略中,公司为了盈利而提取人们的个人数据,通常是在他们不知情或没有得到有意义的同意的情况下。Femtech可以在几个方面压迫月经者。经期妇女失去了对个人信息及其使用方式的控制。其中一些用途可能会使女性在工作场所、保险市场和信用评分方面处于不利地位。此外,这些应用程序可以强迫用户进入一个性别二元,并不总是符合他们的身份。此外,经期追踪器有时不准确,导致意外怀孕。此外,这些数据几乎不可能被删除,导致一些女性在网上被无情地跟踪,并被猜测她们的生育和生育能力。尽管存在这些危害,但对经期监测的法律限制却很少。美国的数据隐私法在很大程度上依赖于通知和同意的概念,它把保护自己隐私的责任放在了人们身上,而不是把责任放在了收集和使用数据的实体身上。然而,通知和同意是一个神话,因为消费者不阅读,无法理解,也没有机会协商隐私政策的条款。通知和同意是一种个人主义的数据隐私方法,它设想了一个原子化的人在竞争激烈的市场中追求自己的利益。经期妇女的需求并不符合这种模式。因此,本文试图在一个扩大的月经正义框架内重新概念化Femtech,该框架承认数据女权主义的原则。在这个愿景中,Femtech将成为一个授权和准确的健康工具,而不是数据提取设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Day 2 Panel 3: Self-Care as Self-Preservation: Understanding Vicarious Trauma & Enhancing Support for Providers Justice For Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Conference Report Day 2 Panel 2: Promoting Equity From the Bench: Judicial Selection, Oversight, and Training Day 1 Lunchtime Speaker: Stephanie McGraw CEO W.A.R.M - We All Really Matter Day 1 Panel 2: How Bias Manifests in New York State's Family Law System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1