Using Speech Acts to Elicit Positive Emotions for Complainants on Social Media

IF 6.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Interactive Marketing Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intmar.2021.02.001
Young Anna Argyris , Kafui Monu , Yongsuk Kim , Yilu Zhou , Zuhui Wang , Zhaozheng Yin
{"title":"Using Speech Acts to Elicit Positive Emotions for Complainants on Social Media","authors":"Young Anna Argyris ,&nbsp;Kafui Monu ,&nbsp;Yongsuk Kim ,&nbsp;Yilu Zhou ,&nbsp;Zuhui Wang ,&nbsp;Zhaozheng Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2021.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A carefully tailored tone in response to a complaint on social media can create positive emotions for an upset customer. However, very few studies have identified what response tones, based on an established theory, would be most effective for complaint management. This study conceptualizes a service agent's response tones based on Ballmer and Brennenstuhl's (1981) classification of speech acts and examines how an agent's use of speech acts elicit positive emotions for the complainant. Ballmer and Brennenstuhl classify speech acts within the dimensions of conventionality and dialogicality, and they suggest the two dimensions interact. Thus, we examine the impact of each dimension of speech acts and the interactions between the two dimensions on the elicitation of positive emotions for complainants. We collected over 100,000 tweets and classified firm agents' speech acts and complainants' emotions by designing deep learning architectures (i.e., bi-directional recurrent neural networks). Our fixed-effect regression results show that a low level of each speech act leads to the elicitation of customers' positive emotions but that the combination of the two erodes the individual advantages. This study expands Ballmer and Brennenstuhl's (1981) speech act classification from a speaker's perspectives to a listener's perspectives by contextualizing it in an analysis of service agents' tones and their roles in eliciting positive emotions among complainants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48260,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 67-80"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.02.001","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996821000153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

A carefully tailored tone in response to a complaint on social media can create positive emotions for an upset customer. However, very few studies have identified what response tones, based on an established theory, would be most effective for complaint management. This study conceptualizes a service agent's response tones based on Ballmer and Brennenstuhl's (1981) classification of speech acts and examines how an agent's use of speech acts elicit positive emotions for the complainant. Ballmer and Brennenstuhl classify speech acts within the dimensions of conventionality and dialogicality, and they suggest the two dimensions interact. Thus, we examine the impact of each dimension of speech acts and the interactions between the two dimensions on the elicitation of positive emotions for complainants. We collected over 100,000 tweets and classified firm agents' speech acts and complainants' emotions by designing deep learning architectures (i.e., bi-directional recurrent neural networks). Our fixed-effect regression results show that a low level of each speech act leads to the elicitation of customers' positive emotions but that the combination of the two erodes the individual advantages. This study expands Ballmer and Brennenstuhl's (1981) speech act classification from a speaker's perspectives to a listener's perspectives by contextualizing it in an analysis of service agents' tones and their roles in eliciting positive emotions among complainants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用言语行为诱导社交媒体投诉者的积极情绪
在回应社交媒体上的投诉时,精心定制的语气可以为沮丧的客户创造积极的情绪。然而,很少有研究根据一个既定的理论,确定什么样的回应语气对投诉管理最有效。本研究以Ballmer和Brennenstuhl(1981)的言语行为分类为基础,对服务代理人的回应语气进行了概念化,并考察了代理人使用言语行为如何引发投诉人的积极情绪。Ballmer和Brennenstuhl将言语行为分为常规性和对话性两个维度,并认为这两个维度是相互作用的。因此,我们研究了言语行为的每个维度以及两个维度之间的相互作用对投诉人积极情绪的激发的影响。我们收集了超过10万条推文,并通过设计深度学习架构(即双向循环神经网络)对公司代理的言语行为和投诉人的情绪进行了分类。我们的固定效应回归结果表明,每一种言语行为的低水平都会引起顾客积极情绪的激发,但两者的结合会侵蚀个体优势。本研究将Ballmer和Brennenstuhl(1981)的言语行为分类从说话者的角度扩展到听者的角度,通过分析服务座席的语调及其在引发投诉人积极情绪方面的作用将其语境化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interactive Marketing aims to explore and discuss issues in the dynamic field of interactive marketing, encompassing both online and offline topics related to analyzing, targeting, and serving individual customers. The journal seeks to publish innovative, high-quality research that presents original results, methodologies, theories, and applications in interactive marketing. Manuscripts should address current or emerging managerial challenges and have the potential to influence both practice and theory in the field. The journal welcomes conceptually rigorous approaches of any type and does not favor or exclude specific methodologies.
期刊最新文献
When Post Hoc Explanation Knocks: Consumer Responses to Explainable AI Recommendations The Effects of Comparative Reviews on Product Sales Examining the Impact of Sponsored Search Results on Choice: An Anchoring Perspective The Power of AI-Generated Voices: How Digital Vocal Tract Length Shapes Product Congruency and Ad Performance Acknowledgments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1