A Pilot Study Exploring Practices that Support the Longevity of Community Gardens Supported by Religious Organizations.

IF 1.6 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Behavior and Social Issues Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI:10.1007/s42822-023-00124-7
Stephanie Cran, Traci M Cihon, Aecio Borba, Kyosuke Kazaoka, Michaela Smith
{"title":"A Pilot Study Exploring Practices that Support the Longevity of Community Gardens Supported by Religious Organizations.","authors":"Stephanie Cran, Traci M Cihon, Aecio Borba, Kyosuke Kazaoka, Michaela Smith","doi":"10.1007/s42822-023-00124-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current food production methods in the United States (US) contribute to environmental degradation as well as food insecurity. Food production by means of community gardens has the potential to reduce the deleterious effects of current production methods. However, many community gardens face challenges that hinder their longevity, thereby reducing the likelihood of the support they might provide for environmentally sustainable food production and decreased food insecurity for community members. Researchers conducted a literature review regarding best practices for community gardens, and used ethnographic research methods to inform a culturo-behavioral systems analysis using the Total Performance System and matrix (systems interdependency) analysis to better understand the cultural practices of two established community gardens in the southwest region of the US. The results of the analyses are presented in terms of recommendations to support each community garden's sustainability. Recommendations regarding future research include environmental manipulations to identify functional relations and potential outcome measures for improving the longevity of community gardens.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42822-023-00124-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":44553,"journal":{"name":"Behavior and Social Issues","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10177712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior and Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-023-00124-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current food production methods in the United States (US) contribute to environmental degradation as well as food insecurity. Food production by means of community gardens has the potential to reduce the deleterious effects of current production methods. However, many community gardens face challenges that hinder their longevity, thereby reducing the likelihood of the support they might provide for environmentally sustainable food production and decreased food insecurity for community members. Researchers conducted a literature review regarding best practices for community gardens, and used ethnographic research methods to inform a culturo-behavioral systems analysis using the Total Performance System and matrix (systems interdependency) analysis to better understand the cultural practices of two established community gardens in the southwest region of the US. The results of the analyses are presented in terms of recommendations to support each community garden's sustainability. Recommendations regarding future research include environmental manipulations to identify functional relations and potential outcome measures for improving the longevity of community gardens.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42822-023-00124-7.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索宗教组织支持社区花园长寿实践的试点研究
美国目前的粮食生产方式导致环境恶化和粮食不安全。通过社区菜园进行粮食生产有可能减少当前生产方式的有害影响。然而,许多社区菜园面临着阻碍其长久发展的挑战,从而降低了它们为环境可持续粮食生产和减少社区成员粮食不安全提供支持的可能性。研究人员就社区菜园的最佳实践进行了文献综述,并采用人种学研究方法,利用全面绩效系统和矩阵(系统相互依存关系)分析法进行了文化行为系统分析,以更好地了解美国西南部地区两个已建成社区菜园的文化实践。分析结果以建议的形式呈现,以支持每个社区菜园的可持续发展。有关未来研究的建议包括环境操作,以确定功能关系和潜在的成果措施,从而提高社区菜园的寿命:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s42822-023-00124-7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior and Social Issues
Behavior and Social Issues PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The primary intellectual framework for Behavior and Social Issues is the science of behavior analysis and its sub-discipline of cultural systems analysis, but contributions from contrasting viewpoints will occasionally be considered if of specific interest to behavior analysts. We recommend that potential authors examine recent issues to determine whether their work is appropriate to the journal. Appropriate contributions include theoretical and conceptual analyses, research articles and brief reports, dialogues, and research reviews. Behavior and Social Issues is an appropriate forum for the work of senior scholars in the field, many of whom serve on the editorial board, as well as for the work of emerging scholars, including students, who have an interest in the contributions of a natural science of behavior to constructing cultures of social justice, human rights, and environmental sustainability.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Needle Phobia Treatments for Participants with Neurodevelopmental Disorders A Behavioral Systems Approach to a Brazilian Restorative Justice Organization Reducing Racial Bias Using a Conflicting Relations Paradigm: A Systematic Replication of Mizael et al. (2016) Addressing Racism in Behavioral Sciences: Recent Insights in the Experimental Analysis of Fairness and Inequity Aversion Student Perceptions of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices Related to Racism in Behavior-Analytic Graduate Training Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1