A Content Analysis of Tasks Involving Two-Dimensional Cartesian Graphs in Grade 6–8 U. S. Textbooks

Hwa Young Lee, Lino Guajardo
{"title":"A Content Analysis of Tasks Involving Two-Dimensional Cartesian Graphs in Grade 6–8 U. S. Textbooks","authors":"Hwa Young Lee, Lino Guajardo","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2023.2241773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Understanding and supporting students’ development of graph literacy is important. We studied how aspects of graph literacy might be supported (or hindered) in middle school by analyzing the content in textbooks. Specifically, we conducted a content analysis of tasks involving two-dimensional Cartesian graphs presented in grade 6–8 US textbooks. Three elements were analyzed: the type of activity involved in graphing, the nature of the graph, and the relevant mathematical topic. We first present three illustrative tasks to demonstrate how we made sense of these three elements with graphing tasks. Second, we present the frequency of different types of coordinate system activity, graph activity, and coordinate system types involved in textbook tasks and how they change across grade level and mathematical domain. Our findings reveal varying levels of explosure to different graphing elements students might encounter through textbooks. We discuss implications of our findings on research, teaching, and curriculum development.","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"15 1","pages":"222 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2023.2241773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding and supporting students’ development of graph literacy is important. We studied how aspects of graph literacy might be supported (or hindered) in middle school by analyzing the content in textbooks. Specifically, we conducted a content analysis of tasks involving two-dimensional Cartesian graphs presented in grade 6–8 US textbooks. Three elements were analyzed: the type of activity involved in graphing, the nature of the graph, and the relevant mathematical topic. We first present three illustrative tasks to demonstrate how we made sense of these three elements with graphing tasks. Second, we present the frequency of different types of coordinate system activity, graph activity, and coordinate system types involved in textbook tasks and how they change across grade level and mathematical domain. Our findings reveal varying levels of explosure to different graphing elements students might encounter through textbooks. We discuss implications of our findings on research, teaching, and curriculum development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国6-8年级教材中二维笛卡尔图任务的内容分析
摘要理解和支持学生的图形素养发展非常重要。我们通过分析教科书中的内容,研究了中学图形素养的各个方面是如何得到支持(或阻碍)的。具体而言,我们对美国6-8年级教科书中涉及二维笛卡尔图的任务进行了内容分析。分析了三个要素:图形所涉及的活动类型、图形的性质以及相关的数学主题。我们首先展示了三个说明性任务,以演示我们如何通过绘图任务理解这三个元素。其次,我们介绍了教科书任务中涉及的不同类型的坐标系活动、图形活动和坐标系类型的频率,以及它们在年级水平和数学领域中的变化。我们的发现揭示了学生在教科书中可能遇到的不同绘图元素的不同程度的解释。我们讨论了我们的研究结果对研究、教学和课程发展的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Connections within the Multiplicative Field: A Case Study of Adán’s Mathematical Thinking Investigating the Complexity in Elementary Teachers’ Noticing of Children’s Mathematical Thinking in Written Work Preservice Secondary Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: Focus on Reflective Practice The Role of Units Coordination in Preservice Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Units Construction and Coordination: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1