{"title":"Why ‘Religion’ and ‘Secular’ Categories in Sociology: Decolonizing the Modern Myth by Mitsutoshi Horii is a major contribution to critical religion","authors":"N. Goldenberg","doi":"10.1177/20503032221148470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An anecdote that Mitsutoshi Horii sets out in his earlier book, The Category of ‘ Religion ’ in Contemporary Japan: Shukyo & Temple Buddhism (2018), illustrates that deconstructing discourse and narrative about matters pertaining to religion is a project that is never far from his mind. He tells his readers that a while ago, on a long fl ight from Tokyo to London, he reached for an in- fl ight magazine to help pass the time. What should have been a sopori fi c, anodyne piece of touristy prose quickly turned into something that provoked him. The following bland sentence stimulated his scholarly brain like caffeine: “ the days when a temple visit was a strictly solemn affair appear to be over, as Japan ’ s ubiquitous places of Buddhist worship open their gates to market traders and even yoga enthusiasts ” (1). Horii sees pervasive in fl uence of distorted narratives about history, au-thenticity, and propriety embedded in this well-intentioned statement. In his fi rst book, with careful and detailed critical scholarship, he counters the fantasies that underlie such prevalent assumptions about what constitutes religion in Japan. He examines the “ classi fi catory practices ” that pertain to Temple Buddhism and explains how the allied occupation imposed and utilized “ religion ” to construct an acceptable post-war Japanese state. “ Religion, ” he argues, operates in contemporary Japan as a constitutional and socio-economic category that, along with the construction of “ non-religion, ” serves particular “ purposes and interests. ” He writes that the term “ religion ” … “ is a rhetorical weapon, which is utilized in relation to speci fi c objectives. It is in this kind of struggle where different meanings of “ religion ” are constructed and","PeriodicalId":43214,"journal":{"name":"Critical Research on Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Research on Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032221148470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
An anecdote that Mitsutoshi Horii sets out in his earlier book, The Category of ‘ Religion ’ in Contemporary Japan: Shukyo & Temple Buddhism (2018), illustrates that deconstructing discourse and narrative about matters pertaining to religion is a project that is never far from his mind. He tells his readers that a while ago, on a long fl ight from Tokyo to London, he reached for an in- fl ight magazine to help pass the time. What should have been a sopori fi c, anodyne piece of touristy prose quickly turned into something that provoked him. The following bland sentence stimulated his scholarly brain like caffeine: “ the days when a temple visit was a strictly solemn affair appear to be over, as Japan ’ s ubiquitous places of Buddhist worship open their gates to market traders and even yoga enthusiasts ” (1). Horii sees pervasive in fl uence of distorted narratives about history, au-thenticity, and propriety embedded in this well-intentioned statement. In his fi rst book, with careful and detailed critical scholarship, he counters the fantasies that underlie such prevalent assumptions about what constitutes religion in Japan. He examines the “ classi fi catory practices ” that pertain to Temple Buddhism and explains how the allied occupation imposed and utilized “ religion ” to construct an acceptable post-war Japanese state. “ Religion, ” he argues, operates in contemporary Japan as a constitutional and socio-economic category that, along with the construction of “ non-religion, ” serves particular “ purposes and interests. ” He writes that the term “ religion ” … “ is a rhetorical weapon, which is utilized in relation to speci fi c objectives. It is in this kind of struggle where different meanings of “ religion ” are constructed and
期刊介绍:
Critical Research on Religion is a peer-reviewed, international journal focusing on the development of a critical theoretical framework and its application to research on religion. It provides a common venue for those engaging in critical analysis in theology and religious studies, as well as for those who critically study religion in the other social sciences and humanities such as philosophy, sociology, anthropology, psychology, history, and literature. A critical approach examines religious phenomena according to both their positive and negative impacts. It draws on methods including but not restricted to the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, Marxism, post-structuralism, feminism, psychoanalysis, ideological criticism, post-colonialism, ecocriticism, and queer studies. The journal seeks to enhance an understanding of how religious institutions and religious thought may simultaneously serve as a source of domination and progressive social change. It attempts to understand the role of religion within social and political conflicts. These conflicts are often based on differences of race, class, ethnicity, region, gender, and sexual orientation – all of which are shaped by social, political, and economic inequity. The journal encourages submissions of theoretically guided articles on current issues as well as those with historical interest using a wide range of methodologies including qualitative, quantitative, and archival. It publishes articles, review essays, book reviews, thematic issues, symposia, and interviews.