Going Underground: What the Natural History Traits of Cave Users Can Tell Us about Cave Use Propensity

IF 0.8 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Journal of Herpetology Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1670/20-055
Thiago Rodrigues dos Santos, Adriano Marques de Souza, Fábio Luis Bondezan, P. Eterovick
{"title":"Going Underground: What the Natural History Traits of Cave Users Can Tell Us about Cave Use Propensity","authors":"Thiago Rodrigues dos Santos, Adriano Marques de Souza, Fábio Luis Bondezan, P. Eterovick","doi":"10.1670/20-055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Amphibians and reptiles use caves in different lithologies and biomes. However, the ecological reasons for such behavior have so far not been investigated in a broad scale. We surveyed 945 Brazilian caves in three biomes (Caatinga, Cerrado, and the Amazon), from which 269 had frogs and reptiles. We classified species of amphibians (34) and reptiles (19) according to natural history traits including habit, activity, diet composition, foraging strategy, and developmental mode (anurans). We used IUCN species distribution maps to predict what species occur in the vicinities of the caves but did not use them to test whether specific life history traits were distributed differently between species using and not using caves. We also tested seasonality and occurrence of bodies of water inside caves used by anurans, as well as the area occupied by man-made building and infrastructure around caves as explanatory factors for cave use intensity. Anurans with direct development were more likely to use caves than those with a tadpole stage. Terrestrial anurans were more likely to use caves than arboreal and semiarboreal anurans. No fossorial, semifossorial, or semiaquatic species used caves. Among reptiles, sit-and-wait foragers were more likely to use caves than active foragers. Semiaquatic and terrestrial reptiles were the most likely to use caves. Anurans were most likely to use caves with perennial bodies of water and during the dry season. Our results indicate that species of the herpetofauna are likely to search for resources in the cave habitat as indicated by the relationship between specific life history traits and cave use.","PeriodicalId":54821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herpetology","volume":"56 1","pages":"153 - 163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1670/20-055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. Amphibians and reptiles use caves in different lithologies and biomes. However, the ecological reasons for such behavior have so far not been investigated in a broad scale. We surveyed 945 Brazilian caves in three biomes (Caatinga, Cerrado, and the Amazon), from which 269 had frogs and reptiles. We classified species of amphibians (34) and reptiles (19) according to natural history traits including habit, activity, diet composition, foraging strategy, and developmental mode (anurans). We used IUCN species distribution maps to predict what species occur in the vicinities of the caves but did not use them to test whether specific life history traits were distributed differently between species using and not using caves. We also tested seasonality and occurrence of bodies of water inside caves used by anurans, as well as the area occupied by man-made building and infrastructure around caves as explanatory factors for cave use intensity. Anurans with direct development were more likely to use caves than those with a tadpole stage. Terrestrial anurans were more likely to use caves than arboreal and semiarboreal anurans. No fossorial, semifossorial, or semiaquatic species used caves. Among reptiles, sit-and-wait foragers were more likely to use caves than active foragers. Semiaquatic and terrestrial reptiles were the most likely to use caves. Anurans were most likely to use caves with perennial bodies of water and during the dry season. Our results indicate that species of the herpetofauna are likely to search for resources in the cave habitat as indicated by the relationship between specific life history traits and cave use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向地下:洞穴使用者的自然历史特征可以告诉我们洞穴使用倾向
摘要两栖动物和爬行动物在不同的岩性和生物群落中使用洞穴。然而,到目前为止,这种行为的生态原因还没有得到广泛的调查。我们调查了三个生物群落(Caatinga、Cerrado和亚马逊)的945个巴西洞穴,其中269个洞穴中有青蛙和爬行动物。我们根据自然历史特征,包括习性、活动、饮食组成、觅食策略和发育模式,对两栖动物(34)和爬行动物(19)进行了分类。我们使用国际自然保护联盟的物种分布图来预测洞穴附近的物种,但没有使用它们来测试使用洞穴和不使用洞穴的物种之间的特定生活史特征分布是否不同。我们还测试了阿努兰人使用的洞穴内水体的季节性和出现情况,以及洞穴周围人造建筑和基础设施占用的面积,作为洞穴使用强度的解释因素。与有蝌蚪阶段的Anurans相比,有直接发育的Anuran更有可能使用洞穴。陆生无尾虫比树栖和半树栖无尾虫更有可能使用洞穴。没有化石、半化石或半水生物种使用洞穴。在爬行动物中,坐以待毙的觅食者比活跃的觅食者更有可能使用洞穴。半水生和陆生爬行动物最有可能使用洞穴。Anurans最有可能在旱季使用有常年水体的洞穴。我们的研究结果表明,特定的生活史特征和洞穴使用之间的关系表明,疱疹动物物种可能会在洞穴栖息地寻找资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Herpetology
Journal of Herpetology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Herpetology accepts manuscripts on all aspects on the biology of amphibians and reptiles including their behavior, conservation, ecology, morphology, physiology, and systematics, as well as herpetological education. We encourage authors to submit manuscripts that are data-driven and rigorous tests of hypotheses, or provide thorough descriptions of novel taxa (living or fossil). Topics may address theoretical issues in a thoughtful, quantitative way. Reviews and policy papers that provide new insight on the herpetological sciences are also welcome, but they must be more than simple literature reviews. These papers must have a central focus that propose a new argument for understanding a concept or a new approach for answering a question or solving a problem. Focus sections that combine papers on related topics are normally determined by the Editors. Publication in the Long-Term Perspectives section is by invitation only. Papers on captive breeding, new techniques or sampling methods, anecdotal or isolated natural history observations, geographic range extensions, and essays should be submitted to our sister journal, Herpetological Review.
期刊最新文献
Profiles of Risk, Allostatic Load, and Mental Health in Low-Income Children. Population Status of American Crocodiles (Crocodylus acutus) (Reptilia: Crocodylidae) (Cuvier 1807) and Spectacled Caimans (Caiman crocodilus) (Reptilia: Alligatoridae) (Linnaeus 1758) in the North Zone of Costa Rica A Test of Intersexual Trophic Niche Partitioning within a Population of Wood Turtles (Glyptemys insculpta) What Do Co-Mimics eat? Trophic Ecology of Ameerega pulchripecta (Anura, Dendrobatidae) and Allobates femoralis (Anura, Aromobatidae) in Eastern Brazilian Amazonia From Small Forest Streams to Large Amazonian Rivers: How Four Sympatric and Sometimes Syntopic Crocodilians Divide Space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1