Does mentoring improve the health of people in the community? A realist evaluation

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Social Work Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI:10.1177/14680173221144411
J. Suurmond, K. Kruithof, J. Harting
{"title":"Does mentoring improve the health of people in the community? A realist evaluation","authors":"J. Suurmond, K. Kruithof, J. Harting","doi":"10.1177/14680173221144411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Mentoring is an intervention aimed at strengthening social networks of individuals by providing one-to-one support to develop a social network. While there is a lack of insight into how the social network intervention “mentoring” affects health outcomes, we used a realist evaluation approach to find out for whom and under what circumstances mentoring affects health. The study was conducted in the Netherlands. In phase 1, an initial program theory of mentoring was developed based on a group interview with participants and professionals engaged in mentoring, complemented by documents (previous studies, descriptions of interventions). In phase 2, the program theory was tested using interviews with 23 participants before and 16 after mentoring. Findings Mentoring strengthened the social network when two conditions were met. Firstly, mentoring coaches needed to be trained. Secondly, participants needed to have a pre-existing—albeit small—network and need to have some social skills. If the social network was strengthened, mentoring increased self-esteem and self-confidence and decreased experiences of depression and loneliness of participants through three mechanisms: (1) participants were acknowledged and their individual needs were accepted; (2) individual coping resources were improved; (3) capabilities to initiate the search for a social network and to be involved in a social network were realized. Applications Mentoring is a useful intervention to increase self-esteem and self-confidence and decrease experiences of depression and loneliness of participants if the two conditions are met. Therefore, mentors should be carefully trained to acknowledge and respond to participants’ individual needs for social bonds.","PeriodicalId":47142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work","volume":"23 1","pages":"463 - 484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173221144411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Mentoring is an intervention aimed at strengthening social networks of individuals by providing one-to-one support to develop a social network. While there is a lack of insight into how the social network intervention “mentoring” affects health outcomes, we used a realist evaluation approach to find out for whom and under what circumstances mentoring affects health. The study was conducted in the Netherlands. In phase 1, an initial program theory of mentoring was developed based on a group interview with participants and professionals engaged in mentoring, complemented by documents (previous studies, descriptions of interventions). In phase 2, the program theory was tested using interviews with 23 participants before and 16 after mentoring. Findings Mentoring strengthened the social network when two conditions were met. Firstly, mentoring coaches needed to be trained. Secondly, participants needed to have a pre-existing—albeit small—network and need to have some social skills. If the social network was strengthened, mentoring increased self-esteem and self-confidence and decreased experiences of depression and loneliness of participants through three mechanisms: (1) participants were acknowledged and their individual needs were accepted; (2) individual coping resources were improved; (3) capabilities to initiate the search for a social network and to be involved in a social network were realized. Applications Mentoring is a useful intervention to increase self-esteem and self-confidence and decrease experiences of depression and loneliness of participants if the two conditions are met. Therefore, mentors should be carefully trained to acknowledge and respond to participants’ individual needs for social bonds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅导能改善社区中人们的健康吗?现实主义评价
导师制是一种干预,旨在通过提供一对一的支持来发展个人的社会网络,从而加强个人的社会网络。虽然缺乏对社会网络干预“指导”如何影响健康结果的洞察力,但我们使用现实主义评估方法来找出指导对谁以及在什么情况下影响健康。这项研究在荷兰进行。在第一阶段,基于对参与者和从事指导的专业人员的小组访谈,并辅以文献(先前的研究,干预措施的描述),形成了一个初步的指导计划理论。在第二阶段,程序理论在指导前和指导后分别对23名参与者和16名参与者进行了访谈。研究发现,当两个条件同时满足时,辅导强化了社会网络。首先,需要对指导教练进行培训。其次,参与者需要有一个预先存在的网络——尽管很小——并且需要有一些社交技巧。在社会网络强化的情况下,师徒关系通过三个机制提高了被试的自尊和自信,减少了被试的抑郁和孤独体验:(1)被试得到了承认,个体需求得到了接受;(2)个体应对资源得到改善;(3)实现了主动搜索社交网络和参与社交网络的能力。在满足这两个条件的情况下,师徒关系是一种有效的干预措施,可以增加参与者的自尊和自信,减少他们的抑郁和孤独体验。因此,导师应该经过仔细的培训,以承认和回应参与者对社会纽带的个人需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Work
Journal of Social Work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work is a forum for the publication, dissemination and debate of key ideas and research in social work. The journal aims to advance theoretical understanding, shape policy, and inform practice, and welcomes submissions from all areas of social work.
期刊最新文献
Bilateral Terson Syndrome Secondary to Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Rupture Associated With Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Social work at the end of life: Humanization of the process Social work scope of practice with Parkinson's disease: A qualitative study Online learning experiences of social work students in India Environmental factors’ influence on criminal legal involvement for people with serious mental illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1