Exploring the Role of Emotioncy in Reading Comprehension Test Bias

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Asia TEFL Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.3.6.835
E. Moradi, Z. Ghabanchi, R. Pishghadam
{"title":"Exploring the Role of Emotioncy in Reading Comprehension Test Bias","authors":"E. Moradi, Z. Ghabanchi, R. Pishghadam","doi":"10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.3.6.835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the significance of psychological factors in forming biases, this study intends to introduce emotioncy, emotions evoked by senses, as a potential source of reading comprehension test bias. To this end, 514 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners were asked to take a 30-item multiple-choice reading comprehension test along with the emotioncy scale. Based on the emotioncy scores, participants were classified into two groups of Low and High-emotioncy. Subsequently, Rasch model-based Differential Item and Test Functioning (DIF/DTF) analyses were employed across the two target groups. The results showed that the reading comprehension test functioned differentially both at the level of the individual items and the whole test as a set of items, favoring the examinees with higher levels of emotioncy. Thus, the study provides evidence for emotioncy as a potential psychological source of reading comprehension test bias and discusses implications for educators and test developers.","PeriodicalId":51808,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia TEFL","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia TEFL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.3.6.835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the significance of psychological factors in forming biases, this study intends to introduce emotioncy, emotions evoked by senses, as a potential source of reading comprehension test bias. To this end, 514 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners were asked to take a 30-item multiple-choice reading comprehension test along with the emotioncy scale. Based on the emotioncy scores, participants were classified into two groups of Low and High-emotioncy. Subsequently, Rasch model-based Differential Item and Test Functioning (DIF/DTF) analyses were employed across the two target groups. The results showed that the reading comprehension test functioned differentially both at the level of the individual items and the whole test as a set of items, favoring the examinees with higher levels of emotioncy. Thus, the study provides evidence for emotioncy as a potential psychological source of reading comprehension test bias and discusses implications for educators and test developers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究情绪在阅读理解测试偏差中的作用
鉴于心理因素在形成偏见中的重要性,本研究旨在引入情绪,即感官诱发的情绪,作为阅读理解测试偏见的潜在来源。为此,514名英语学习者被要求参加一项30项多项选择阅读理解测试和情绪量表。根据情绪得分,参与者被分为情绪低和情绪高两组。随后,在两个目标群体中采用基于Rasch模型的差异项目和测试功能(DIF/DTF)分析。结果表明,阅读理解测试在单项水平和整体项目水平上都有不同的作用,有利于情绪水平较高的考生。因此,本研究为情绪作为阅读理解测试偏见的潜在心理来源提供了证据,并讨论了对教育工作者和测试开发人员的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asia TEFL
Journal of Asia TEFL EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of The Impact of English Training Program in Improving the Trainee’s Communicative Competence Demystifying the Narrative of a Former International Student in TESOL : Reflecting on a Post-Interview Study Understanding Chinese High School ESL Learners’ Use of L2 Attitudinal Resources in Letter Writing : A Systemic Functional Perspective Integrating Technology into ESP Instruction : Teaching English for Pharmacy Students EFL Teachers’ Cognition of Feedback Techniques on Pronunciation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1