Challenging the paradigm

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Breathe Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1183/20734735.0148-2021
M. Everard
{"title":"Challenging the paradigm","authors":"M. Everard","doi":"10.1183/20734735.0148-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I read with interest the review by Bush and Pavord [1] regarding the suggestion that we should abandon “umbrella” diagnoses and rather we should address “treatable traits” when looking after patients with airways disease. Unfortunately, aspects of their proposal are only likely to add to, rather than reduce, the current confusion regarding management of these conditions. More importantly, it seems to include some potentially very dangerous recommendations. While advocating for addressing “treatable traits” is admirable in that it reminds clinicians to consider the patient and not the disease, the use of this idea to promote dangerous changes in practice should be challenged. https://bit.ly/30VkP8Q","PeriodicalId":9292,"journal":{"name":"Breathe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breathe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0148-2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

I read with interest the review by Bush and Pavord [1] regarding the suggestion that we should abandon “umbrella” diagnoses and rather we should address “treatable traits” when looking after patients with airways disease. Unfortunately, aspects of their proposal are only likely to add to, rather than reduce, the current confusion regarding management of these conditions. More importantly, it seems to include some potentially very dangerous recommendations. While advocating for addressing “treatable traits” is admirable in that it reminds clinicians to consider the patient and not the disease, the use of this idea to promote dangerous changes in practice should be challenged. https://bit.ly/30VkP8Q
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战范式
我饶有兴趣地阅读了Bush和Pavord b[1]关于我们应该放弃“伞状”诊断,而应该在照顾呼吸道疾病患者时关注“可治疗特征”的建议的评论。不幸的是,他们的建议的某些方面只可能增加,而不是减少,目前对这些条件的管理的混乱。更重要的是,它似乎包含了一些潜在的非常危险的建议。虽然提倡解决“可治疗特征”是令人钦佩的,因为它提醒临床医生考虑患者而不是疾病,但在实践中使用这种想法来促进危险的变化应该受到挑战。https://bit.ly/30VkP8Q
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breathe
Breathe RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An elderly woman with acute respiratory failure and diffuse pulmonary changes. Con: indwelling pleural catheters cause harm to patients. Erratum: "Steroids in severe community-acquired pneumonia". S. Ananth, A.G. Mathioudakis, J. Hansel. Breathe 2024; 20: 240081. Highlights from the Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation Conference 2024. Integration of lung function data: turning snapshots into stories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1