The influence of nonwork resources, nonwork demands and external support on work engagement and productivity: A moderated mediation model

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED SA Journal of Industrial Psychology Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1957
Hamfrey Sanhokwe
{"title":"The influence of nonwork resources, nonwork demands and external support on work engagement and productivity: A moderated mediation model","authors":"Hamfrey Sanhokwe","doi":"10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orientation: Working from home eliminated the work–nonwork divide. The lives of employees at home were instantaneously connected to their engagement and productivity at work. The mechanisms and pathways through which an individual’s access to and management of nonwork resources and demands influence behaviours and outcomes at work have been scantily investigated.Research purpose: Hinged primarily on the conservation of resources theory, the study examined the influence of the external support, nonwork demands and resources on work engagement and employee productivity.Motivation for the study: Understanding how work–nonwork resources and demands interact(ed) to shape behaviour and outcomes in the work domain could shape cross-domain resource conservation and enhancement efforts.Research approach/design and method: Data were collected from a convenient sample of 185 nongovernmental organisation employees using a standard questionnaire. Structural models, with bootstrapping, were used to evaluate the hypothesised moderating and mediating effects.Main findings: Nonwork resources were positively associated with work engagement. External support moderated the negative relationship between nonwork demands and work engagement. Work engagement mediated the effects of nonwork resources and nonwork demands on employee productivity.Practical/managerial implications: Organizational leaders should appreciate the ecological conditions within which work and nonwork resources are generated and expended. This has implications on desirable, value creating workplace behaviours and related outcomes.Contribution/value-add: The study further exposed the interdependence of the work and non-work domains. Workplaces that enrich both domains will likely enjoy sustained value generation.","PeriodicalId":47235,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orientation: Working from home eliminated the work–nonwork divide. The lives of employees at home were instantaneously connected to their engagement and productivity at work. The mechanisms and pathways through which an individual’s access to and management of nonwork resources and demands influence behaviours and outcomes at work have been scantily investigated.Research purpose: Hinged primarily on the conservation of resources theory, the study examined the influence of the external support, nonwork demands and resources on work engagement and employee productivity.Motivation for the study: Understanding how work–nonwork resources and demands interact(ed) to shape behaviour and outcomes in the work domain could shape cross-domain resource conservation and enhancement efforts.Research approach/design and method: Data were collected from a convenient sample of 185 nongovernmental organisation employees using a standard questionnaire. Structural models, with bootstrapping, were used to evaluate the hypothesised moderating and mediating effects.Main findings: Nonwork resources were positively associated with work engagement. External support moderated the negative relationship between nonwork demands and work engagement. Work engagement mediated the effects of nonwork resources and nonwork demands on employee productivity.Practical/managerial implications: Organizational leaders should appreciate the ecological conditions within which work and nonwork resources are generated and expended. This has implications on desirable, value creating workplace behaviours and related outcomes.Contribution/value-add: The study further exposed the interdependence of the work and non-work domains. Workplaces that enrich both domains will likely enjoy sustained value generation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非工作资源、非工作需求和外部支持对工作参与度和生产力的影响:一个有调节的中介模型
定位:在家办公消除了工作与非工作的界限。员工在家的生活瞬间与他们在工作中的投入和生产力联系在一起。个人对非工作资源和需求的获取和管理对工作行为和结果的影响的机制和途径已经得到了很少的研究。研究目的:本研究主要以资源守恒理论为基础,考察外部支持、非工作需求和资源对工作投入和员工生产力的影响。研究动机:了解工作-非工作资源和需求如何相互作用(ed)来塑造工作领域中的行为和结果,从而塑造跨领域的资源保护和增强努力。研究方法/设计和方法:采用标准问卷,从185名非政府组织雇员中方便地收集数据。结构模型,带自举,被用来评估假设的调节和中介效应。主要发现:非工作资源与工作投入呈正相关。外部支持调节了非工作需求与工作投入之间的负向关系。工作投入在非工作资源和非工作需求对员工生产力的影响中起中介作用。实践/管理意义:组织领导者应该了解工作和非工作资源产生和消耗的生态条件。这对理想的、创造价值的工作场所行为和相关结果都有影响。贡献/增值:该研究进一步揭示了工作和非工作领域的相互依赖性。丰富这两个领域的工作场所可能会享受持续的价值创造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Industrial and organisational psychology internship completion: Enabling and thwarting factors Transmogrification in the Fourth Industrial Revolution and beyond. Let that sink in The relationship between employee well-being and organisational effectiveness Exploring meaningful rewards for pharmaceutical employees during COVID-19 The organisational commitment of academic personnel during WFH within private higher education, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1