Walking hand in hand: The role of affection-sharing in understanding the social network effect in same-sex, mixed-sex, and gender-diverse relationships.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Social and Personal Relationships Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1177/02654075231169786
Karen L Blair, Chelsea Hudson, Diane Holmberg
{"title":"Walking hand in hand: The role of affection-sharing in understanding the social network effect in same-sex, mixed-sex, and gender-diverse relationships.","authors":"Karen L Blair, Chelsea Hudson, Diane Holmberg","doi":"10.1177/02654075231169786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals who perceive greater support or approval for their relationships from friends and family also report greater relationship stability and commitment and better mental and physical health (known as the \"social network effect\"). These associations have been explained, in part, through three cognitive-affective processes: uncertainty reduction, cognitive balance, and dyadic identity formation. However, we know less about cognitive-<i>behavioral</i> mechanisms that might help explain the social network effect. In this study, we propose and test a model in which physical affection-sharing acts as one such behavioral mechanism. In a sample of 1848 individuals in same-sex (<i>n</i> = 696), mixed-sex (<i>n</i> = 1045), and gender-diverse (<i>n</i> = 107) relationships, we found support for our overall model. Our findings suggest that perceived support for one's relationships is a significant predictor of perceived support for physical affection-sharing, which in turn predicts the frequency of affection-sharing in private and public contexts and, ultimately, relationship well-being. However, we also found that relationship type moderates these associations, highlighting how the experience of sharing affection with one's partner changes for many in marginalized relationships, especially in public. We conclude by discussing how our findings contribute to theories of social support for relationships, underscoring the importance of considering affective, cognitive, and behavioral factors relevant to the process. We also emphasize the understudied role of context in shaping affection-sharing experiences across all relationship types.</p>","PeriodicalId":48288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632134/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231169786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Individuals who perceive greater support or approval for their relationships from friends and family also report greater relationship stability and commitment and better mental and physical health (known as the "social network effect"). These associations have been explained, in part, through three cognitive-affective processes: uncertainty reduction, cognitive balance, and dyadic identity formation. However, we know less about cognitive-behavioral mechanisms that might help explain the social network effect. In this study, we propose and test a model in which physical affection-sharing acts as one such behavioral mechanism. In a sample of 1848 individuals in same-sex (n = 696), mixed-sex (n = 1045), and gender-diverse (n = 107) relationships, we found support for our overall model. Our findings suggest that perceived support for one's relationships is a significant predictor of perceived support for physical affection-sharing, which in turn predicts the frequency of affection-sharing in private and public contexts and, ultimately, relationship well-being. However, we also found that relationship type moderates these associations, highlighting how the experience of sharing affection with one's partner changes for many in marginalized relationships, especially in public. We conclude by discussing how our findings contribute to theories of social support for relationships, underscoring the importance of considering affective, cognitive, and behavioral factors relevant to the process. We also emphasize the understudied role of context in shaping affection-sharing experiences across all relationship types.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
携手同行:情感分享在理解同性、混合性别和性别多样化关系中的社会网络效应中的作用
那些从朋友和家人那里得到更多支持或认可的人也报告说,他们的关系更稳定,更忠诚,心理和身体更健康(被称为“社会网络效应”)。这些关联在一定程度上可以通过三个认知情感过程来解释:不确定性减少、认知平衡和二元身份形成。然而,我们对可能有助于解释社会网络效应的认知行为机制知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们提出并测试了一个模型,其中身体情感分享作为一种行为机制。在同性(n = 696)、混合性别(n = 1045)和性别多样化(n = 107)关系中的1848个人样本中,我们发现了对我们整体模型的支持。我们的研究结果表明,对一个人的关系的感知支持是对身体情感分享的感知支持的一个重要预测因素,而身体情感分享反过来又预测了在私人和公共环境中情感分享的频率,并最终预测了关系的幸福感。然而,我们也发现,关系类型缓和了这些联系,强调了许多处于边缘关系中的人与伴侣分享感情的经历是如何变化的,尤其是在公共场合。最后,我们讨论了我们的研究结果对人际关系社会支持理论的贡献,强调了考虑与此过程相关的情感、认知和行为因素的重要性。我们还强调了在所有关系类型中,情境在塑造情感分享体验方面的作用尚未得到充分研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
187
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social and Personal Relationships is an international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research on social and personal relationships. JSPR is the leading journal in the field, publishing empirical and theoretical papers on social and personal relationships. It is multidisciplinary in scope, drawing material from the fields of social psychology, clinical psychology, communication, developmental psychology, and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Social ties and social identification: Influences on well-being in young adults. The more useful, the more close: Instrumental deliberation boosts closeness with non-close others Social relationships in adults who were adopted following institutional deprivation Are there cross-cultural differences in the transformation of motivation process in close relationships? Joint trajectories of self-esteem and neuroticism among newlywed couples: Associations with marital quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1