The Rediscovery of Jan Ruyscher and Its Consequence

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the American Institute for Conservation Pub Date : 2021-01-11 DOI:10.1080/01971360.2020.1822702
Flavia Fiorillo, Laura Hendriks, I. Hajdas, M. Vandini, E. Huysecom
{"title":"The Rediscovery of Jan Ruyscher and Its Consequence","authors":"Flavia Fiorillo, Laura Hendriks, I. Hajdas, M. Vandini, E. Huysecom","doi":"10.1080/01971360.2020.1822702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2014, a painting attributed to the seventeenth century Dutch artist Jan Ruyscher appeared on the art market. Despite a prestigious career, Ruyscher, who possibly was a pupil of Rembrandt and Hercules Seghers, vanished from art history after his death and was only rediscovered in the 1930s. In this research paper, the combination of multiple analytical techniques ranging from radiocarbon dating of the support material to multispectral imaging and spectroscopic analyses (XRF, SEM-EDS, FTIR and Raman) of the pictorial layer offers a comprehensive analysis of the object. Radiocarbon analyses of the wooden panel indicated that the tree was probably cut down in the mid-eighteenth century, whereas spectroscopic analyses pinpointed the twentieth century as a timeframe for the application of the pictorial layers. The applied methodology sheds new light on the story of the object itself. The painting was created at the earliest in the 1930s possibly as a consequence of the rediscovery of Ruyscher, and the deliberate use of an aged panel supports an intent to deceive and hence classifies the object as a forgery. The painting under study was furthermore compared with artworks of renowned forgers in an attempt to identify the forger in disguise.","PeriodicalId":17165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation","volume":"61 1","pages":"55 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01971360.2020.1822702","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2020.1822702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT In 2014, a painting attributed to the seventeenth century Dutch artist Jan Ruyscher appeared on the art market. Despite a prestigious career, Ruyscher, who possibly was a pupil of Rembrandt and Hercules Seghers, vanished from art history after his death and was only rediscovered in the 1930s. In this research paper, the combination of multiple analytical techniques ranging from radiocarbon dating of the support material to multispectral imaging and spectroscopic analyses (XRF, SEM-EDS, FTIR and Raman) of the pictorial layer offers a comprehensive analysis of the object. Radiocarbon analyses of the wooden panel indicated that the tree was probably cut down in the mid-eighteenth century, whereas spectroscopic analyses pinpointed the twentieth century as a timeframe for the application of the pictorial layers. The applied methodology sheds new light on the story of the object itself. The painting was created at the earliest in the 1930s possibly as a consequence of the rediscovery of Ruyscher, and the deliberate use of an aged panel supports an intent to deceive and hence classifies the object as a forgery. The painting under study was furthermore compared with artworks of renowned forgers in an attempt to identify the forger in disguise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扬·吕舍尔的重新发现及其后果
2014年,一幅被认为是17世纪荷兰艺术家Jan Ruyscher的画作出现在艺术市场上。尽管生涯显赫,但可能是伦勃朗(Rembrandt)和赫拉克勒斯·塞格斯(Hercules Seghers)学生的鲁伊舍尔在死后从艺术史上消失了,直到20世纪30年代才被重新发现。在本研究中,结合多种分析技术,从支撑材料的放射性碳定年到图像层的多光谱成像和光谱分析(XRF, SEM-EDS, FTIR和拉曼),提供了对物体的全面分析。对木板的放射性碳分析表明,这棵树可能是在18世纪中期被砍伐的,而光谱分析则指出,20世纪是应用图像层的时间框架。应用的方法为对象本身的故事提供了新的亮点。这幅画最早创作于20世纪30年代,可能是Ruyscher重新发现的结果,故意使用陈旧的面板支持欺骗的意图,因此将该对象归类为伪造品。研究中的这幅画还与著名伪造者的作品进行了比较,试图找出伪装的伪造者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The American Institute for Conservation is the largest conservation membership organization in the United States, and counts among its more than 3000 members the majority of professional conservators, conservation educators and conservation scientists worldwide. The Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (JAIC, or the Journal) is the primary vehicle for the publication of peer-reviewed technical studies, research papers, treatment case studies and ethics and standards discussions relating to the broad field of conservation and preservation of historic and cultural works. Subscribers to the JAIC include AIC members, both individuals and institutions, as well as major libraries and universities.
期刊最新文献
Analytical Investigation of Two Syrian-Style Bronze Sphinx Plaques from the Iron Age of West Asia (First Millennium BCE) Introduction to the Special Issue on Practical Approaches to Technical Research – Part 2 Untangling Indian Hemp: Identifying Woodlands Bast Fibers in Collections Using a PH-adjusted Semi-rigid Agarose Gel with Ion Exchange Resin for Poultice Desalination: Preliminary Experimentation and Case Studies Preventive Conservation: Continuously Defining Itself at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1